#1 Reason Why Nirvana Is Better Than Pumpkins

[Kurt Cocaine]

i'll respond to The Dumbest ones First:

Originally Posted by tcm

can you Believe that Guy!! he Is going all Off about Nirvana and He can't Even Spell kurt COBAIN'S name right!! Discuss!!!

Dumbass, way to capitalize a bunch of words that aren't supposed to be capatalized. Anyway, My Screen name is a pun on His name, Cocaine like the drug? Jesus, man, do you still Live with you Parents and You Don't know even what cocaine is? open a Book, YA KNOW?

Originally Posted by full moon

They were a pigeon hole band. Grunge. A fad. Nothing more. Cobain offed himself. He had nothing left to offer and knew it. Most overrated band ever...

you are just A Nobody, plain and Simple. So, nothing Much to say to you. Grunge was Not a fad, it is still alive in Well.

Originally Posted by christian zombie vampires

remember that lost episode of sliders where jerry o'connell went into the world where kurt cobain didn't die but nirvana slowly became less popular and relevant and fell out of fashion just like everyone else. oh no wait that's actually what would really happen.

maybe HE would have QUIT, dont you think?! who says They would have Kept going, you little pissant.

Originally Posted by RenewRevive

whilst it is true that the popularity of the band would have (had already) decreased, in utero would present a counter-argument that he had nothing left as an artist, despite the sales being down on nevermind (ie less accessible).

so you Base everything on Sales, huh? then What are you doing on a Smashing pumpkins Website? ahahah.

Originally Posted by TheMilstead

Do you know nothing of the band members' later history?

no, the Way you said it earlier I Wasn't sure What you were talking about.

[fluxequalsrad]

Originally Posted by Kurt Cocaine

i'll respond to The Dumbest ones First:


Dumbass, way to capitalize a bunch of words that aren't supposed to be capatalized. Anyway, My Screen name is a pun on His name, Cocaine like the drug? Jesus, man, do you still Live with you Parents and You Don't know even what cocaine is? open a Book, YA KNOW?

there's no way that is a pun. definately a spelling error.

[dudehitscar]

nirvana was amazing but the pumpkins are the greatest band of all time.

[TheMilstead]

Originally Posted by Kurt Cocaine

Dumbass, way to capitalize a bunch of words that aren't supposed to be capatalized.

Get a load of this guy.

[TheMilstead]

Originally Posted by tcm

NO, YOU'RE AWESOME!

[Axis of Action]

can we abort this thread

[Da Jesus]

Kurt Co-BANG!

[I'm Hardcore]

and Dave Lol

[D.]

Originally Posted by I'm Hardcore

and Dave Lol

nice

[Mo]

Also, Nirvana did break up.

[theghostchild]

Nirvana was good, but they were not great. And for the record, outside of their fan-base, no one cared about the Pumpkins until 1979 and Tonight, Tonight were playing everyday on MTV and on the speakers at Abercrombie.

[astrosfan719]

Nirvana was good for the few years that Cobain was alive. The Pumpkins have been making music for around 15 years.

[JessiMercury]

i hope everyone who likes nirvana kills themselves like their idol. then the worldwide IQ average would raise a few points.

[The Jesus]

Originally Posted by Kurt Cocaine

Plus, Nirvana was a Revolution. No one cared About the Pumpkins While Nirvana was Around.

No-one cares about the Pumpkins now. No-one!

[TheMilstead]

Originally Posted by JessiMercury

i hope everyone who likes nirvana kills themselves like their idol. then the worldwide IQ average would raise a few points.

I'd rather see emos and gangstas go first. It would have a bigger impact.

[Shapan]

if you want to respond to the dumbest ones you might as well start with this

Originally Posted by Kurt Cocaine

And what the Fuck are You On? Dave grohl not the original drummer? Piss off.

[tcm]

Originally Posted by Kurt Cocaine

you are just A Nobody, plain and Simple. So, nothing Much to say to you. Grunge was Not a fad, it is still alive in Well.

what's that, girl? Grunge is stuck in the Well?!

[Fattening Ass]

this is easily the best thread in this forum

[exactlythesame]

Shh.
































If you're quiet, you can hear Cobain rolling over in his grave.

[exactlythesame]

Originally Posted by RockLobster

what a shitty troll. you should blow your head off like your idol.

Uncool.

The suicide jokes are stale.

[pale_princess]

Originally Posted by christian zombie vampires

remember that lost episode of sliders where jerry o'connell went into the world where kurt cobain didn't die but nirvana slowly became less popular and relevant and fell out of fashion just like everyone else. oh no wait that's actually what would really happen.

only worthwhile post in this thread.

[drhouse]

Originally Posted by Axis of Action

can we abort this person

Fixed.

[danondorf]

Originally Posted by the antipop

Also, Nirvana did break up.

ZING

[danondorf]

Originally Posted by Kurt Cocaine

why are you typing like that? you are an idiot.

And what the Fuck are You On? Dave grohl not the original drummer? Piss off.

[hemocleric]

k, i'll try to make this quick........

The pumpkins were (and are) a better band than Nirvana -in my humble opinion- in virtually every way. The bullshit about them (Nirvana) 'burning out and fading away' is fucking retarded for several reasons: first of all, people don't burn out AND fade away...they do one or the other. they're opposites. Ever heard the phrase 'I'd rather burn out than fade away..'? Anyway, Nirvana didn't have time to start making music that pissed everyone off for being too different from what they'd done in the past (or too similar, for that matter.......that's the catch 22 of a career that lasts several records). They just had time to make an insanely successful major label debut, then follow it up with a record that was almost universally panned by critics...and didn't sell very well.....then they were gone. Nirvana was out of the game before people could REALLY start questioning their staying-power. They weren't faced with being forced to try reinventing themselves, while simultaneously managing to NOT alienate old fans. As for the 'revolution' thing.......ALTERNATIVE MUSIC WAS A REVOLUTION, NOT JUST NIRVANA.

The shit about Corgan 'failing solo-wise' is fairly mindless too. What did he fail to do. He made the record. ummmm...toured on it. Where's the failure? Are you refering to the sales? That's a really unmusical reason to deem any record a 'failure'. Did you just not like the album? Do you brand everything you don't like as a 'failure'?

I don't want to be misunderstood here, Nirvana was a great and important band; I'm not denying that. I just happen to disagree with pretty much everything you (the thread-starter) said........but that's just me..

[hemocleric]

oh yeah, and nirvana's orignal drummer's name was chad (i'm sure someone's already said that by now).



peace..

[dudehitscar]

Originally Posted by hemocleric

k, i'll try to make this quick........

The pumpkins were (and are) a better band than Nirvana -in my humble opinion- in virtually every way. The bullshit about them (Nirvana) 'burning out and fading away' is fucking retarded for several reasons: first of all, people don't burn out AND fade away...they do one or the other. they're opposites. Ever heard the phrase 'I'd rather burn out than fade away..'? Anyway, Nirvana didn't have time to start making music that pissed everyone off for being too different from what they'd done in the past (or too similar, for that matter.......that's the catch 22 of a career that lasts several records). They just had time to make an insanely successful major label debut, then follow it up with a record that was almost universally panned by critics...and didn't sell very well.....then they were gone. Nirvana was out of the game before people could REALLY start questioning their staying-power. They weren't faced with being forced to try reinventing themselves, while simultaneously managing to NOT alienate old fans. As for the 'revolution' thing.......ALTERNATIVE MUSIC WAS A REVOLUTION, NOT JUST NIRVANA.

The shit about Corgan 'failing solo-wise' is fairly mindless too. What did he fail to do. He made the record. ummmm...toured on it. Where's the failure? Are you refering to the sales? That's a really unmusical reason to deem any record a 'failure'. Did you just not like the album? Do you brand everything you don't like as a 'failure'?

I don't want to be misunderstood here, Nirvana was a great and important band; I'm not denying that. I just happen to disagree with pretty much everything you (the thread-starter) said........but that's just me..

[mpp]

np: Blew (5/4/90)

these guys were pretty good i think

[Kurt Cocaine]

Originally Posted by Da Jesus

Kurt Co-BANG!

dont you mean, Kurt Go-Bang? YUK YUK YUK

Originally Posted by theghostchild

And for the record, outside of their fan-base, no one cared about the Pumpkins until 1979 and Tonight, Tonight were playing everyday on MTV and on the speakers at Abercrombie.

yeah Because their Stuff before that was F'Ing lame, bro.

Originally Posted by JessiMercury

i hope everyone who likes nirvana kills themselves like their idol. then the worldwide IQ average would raise a few points.

you're a Dumb bitch. how long have You Even been at this Messageboard anyway? ive Been Here since 2005, so fuck off.

Originally Posted by RockLobster

what a shitty troll. you should blow your head off like your idol.

stale.

troll. suicide.

stale!

Originally Posted by hemocleric

k, i'll try to make this quick........ ........but that's just me..

more like homocleric

[Ever]

Originally Posted by JessiMercury

i hope everyone who likes nirvana kills themselves like their idol. then the worldwide IQ average would raise a few points.

Not necessarily. Howcome you don't like nirvana?