lol i love this - Page 2

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Best Looking Boy
You realize you replied to yourself here? I know I know, it's hard to keep track.

i twas a continuation of a chain of thought :erm

kypper · 11-01-2002, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

excuse me kypper, but scouse_dave replies to a thread i made posting a great painting by one of the great renaissance masters, and says that this thread is 'shite'. why would he reply to my thread telling me it's shite? no fucking reason. just to be a jerk. and actually it's the other way around. he's the person who sees the world in black and white, obviously, since he has the audacity to come into my thread and accuse it of being shite just because netphoria chose not to reply to it

I disagree. He figured the painting sucked, and disagreed with your promotion of it. He then inferred that the reason few people had responded was because they thought the same. Don't take everything so personally.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

I disagree. He figured the painting sucked, and disagreed with your promotion of it. He then inferred that the reason few people had responded was because they thought the same. Don't take everything so personally.

no it's because scouse_dave doesn't like art. in general. he doesn't like art. and besides that, he iddn't say 'that painting is shite' which wouldn't have offended me, he said 'this thread is shite' as if i'm not fucking allowed to post a painting that i like. whatever duncan.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 07:58 PM

and if i saw a thread entitled 'lol i love this' and i happened to click on it and see a painting, i would be pleasantly surprised. so thirdly i don't see what his fucking problem is.

anyways. i don't even know why i read his post. i have him on ignore for a reason. it's just i guess that he was the only one who had replied althoug hexactly why i thought it would be a worthwhile reply is beyond me.

kypper · 11-01-2002, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

no it's because scouse_dave doesn't like art. in general. he doesn't like art. and besides that, he iddn't say 'that painting is shite' which wouldn't have offended me, he said 'this thread is shite' as if i'm not fucking allowed to post a painting that i like. whatever duncan.

whatever indeed. The world is not out to get you.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:00 PM

http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth...de/joconde.jpg

la joconde

Mayfuck · 11-01-2002, 08:01 PM

http://www.artofcolour.com/in-depth/...-mona-lisa.JPG

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

whatever indeed. The world is not out to get you.

excuse me. but if someone who i obviously can't stand and who obviously can't stand me finds it necessary to reply to one of my threads being a negative jerk for no fucking reason, and contributing nothing to the discussion, then i think i'm perfectly validated in being annoyed. i don't know who the fuck you people think you are replying to my threads just to be judgmental idiots. sorry you don't approve of art. i think it's ridiculous that dave would call my thread 'shite' even though it basically consists of a painting by one of the renaissance masters. it's not like i posted some shitty 'all yuor base' graphic or stupid knock-knock joke, it's a beautiful painting and it's absolutely ridiculous that someone thinks they're validated in calling it 'shite' as if that's a universal fact.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mayfuck
http://www.artofcolour.com/in-depth/...-mona-lisa.JPG

oh now that is not very nice

kypper · 11-01-2002, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

excuse me. but if someone who i obviously can't stand and who obviously can't stand me finds it necessary to reply to one of my threads being a negative jerk for no fucking reason, and contributing nothing to the discussion, then i think i'm perfectly validated in being annoyed. i don't know who the fuck you people think you are replying to my threads just to be judgmental idiots. sorry you don't approve of art. i think it's ridiculous that dave would call my thread 'shite' even though it basically consists of a painting by one of the renaissance masters. it's not like i posted some shitty 'all yuor base' graphic or stupid knock-knock joke, it's a beautiful painting and it's absolutely ridiculous that someone thinks they're validated in calling it 'shite' as if that's a universal fact.

To him it is, and it's his right to post that he dislikes the painting.
Calm down.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

To him it is, and it's his right to post that he dislikes the painting.
Calm down.

i don't fucking care if someone posts that they dislike the painting. if he'd posted saying he disliked the painting then i wouldn't fucking care. but h eposted saying he dislikes my post, BECAUSE i posted a painting, as if that's fucking wrong or lame or something, just because he happens to not enjoy art. it's a fucking stupid thing to say. 'oh this thread is shite because i personally don't like art'. it's stupid. disliking a painting is one thing. disliking a thread just because it posted a painting is just retarded. now leave me the fuck alone.

Mayfuck · 11-01-2002, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

To him it is, and it's his right to post that he dislikes the painting.
Calm down.

It's not really a matter of him liking the painting or not. It's just about him deciding to be annoying and making an unconstructive criticism. It's like if you posted about some band you really liked and someone replied with simply "They suck" to spite you. It's annoying.

kypper · 11-01-2002, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Enisled

why are you telling her to calm down when you are sitting there with a fucking hardon elated with the idea of you pissing her off?

I'm not.

kypper · 11-01-2002, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mayfuck

It's not really a matter of him liking the painting or not. It's just about him deciding to be annoying and making an unconstructive criticism. It's like if you posted about some band you really liked and someone replied with simply "They suck" to spite you. It's annoying.

Criticism is valid. she should've expected that with her expected praise. That's part of being the human race.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Enisled

why are you telling her to calm down when you are sitting there with a fucking hardon elated with the idea of you pissing her off?

THANK YOU

http://161.58.208.54/artchive/m/michelangelo/pieta.jpg

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

Criticism is valid. she should've expected that with her expected praise. That's part of being the human race.

criticism for what? for fucking making a post? oh god forbid suze makes a post. i mean jesus christ. this is a message board that's jus tnot what people do. shut the fuck up. okay?

kypper · 11-01-2002, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

THANK YOU

http://161.58.208.54/artchive/m/michelangelo/pieta.jpg

now that's art.

kypper · 11-01-2002, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

criticism for what? for fucking making a post? oh god forbid suze makes a post. i mean jesus christ. this is a message board that's jus tnot what people do. shut the fuck up. okay?

Jesus christ, he dislikes your painting. That's all.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:13 PM

and once again, i expect criticism/reactions to what i'm actually positing. in this case i posted a painting. i wasn't aware that i would receive criticism for the fact that i posted a painting. so just shut up. i wasn't aware there were fucking rules about how it's a big faux pas to post a piece by hans holbein. i wasn't aware it was a faux pas to disappoint poor dave's retarded brain by making him click on my thread only to see a painting (oh, the horror). seriously.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

Jesus christ, he dislikes your painting. That's all.

no, he dislikes paintings in general and therefore thinks a post with a painting in it is automatically shite and hte fact that netphorians don't reply to a thread with a painting in it is proof of that. well i would say that the fact tha tnetphorians don't reply to a thread with a painting in it is just proof of how repulsive and ignorant and horrible you people are. just shut the fuck up. why don't you leave my thread you piece of shit.

kypper · 11-01-2002, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

Sorry, but I don't have the energy for that.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:18 PM

wow. saint augustine. http://www.masters-of-photography.co..._augustine.jpg

this painting...i don't know. i';m sorta too depressed/irritated/whatever right now to explain it. but st augustine was so fucking weird. like. i don' tknow. and this painting just like. nevermind.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

Sorry, but I don't have the energy for that.

thank god. maybe now you'll leave me alone.

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:22 PM

but ps

isn't it sort of funny that this gay little turd duncan comes into MY thread, insults me, argues with me, then puts me on his ignore list? i mean what does he expect when he comes into a thread of mine? does he expect posts by me not to exist in a thread made by me? doesn't make much sense. and considering he started it in the first place. yeah. logical fallacies. irrational behaviour. i give up.

11-01-2002, 08:29 PM

that really rox!

noir cat · 11-01-2002, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Samsa

no it's because scouse_dave doesn't like art. in general. he doesn't like art.

Um. Yeah. That maybe accurate, because when he came to visit me, I was all like, I'm sorry, we don't have any good museums here! Everything's crap. And he was all like, okay, that's fine, I'm not into that sorta shit (meaning museums) and I was all like

.

noir cat · 11-01-2002, 08:40 PM

Not to MENTION dave's wonderful sense of fashion!!!

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:44 PM

someone tell me what's wrong witht his pic. the winnar gets a hug

http://161.58.208.54/artchive/l/leon...ari_sketch.jpg

Tessellation · 11-01-2002, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kypper

whatever indeed. The world is not out to get you.

she will never learn. She's just as self-righteous a twit as the Nazis she constantly mentions here...

Samsa · 11-01-2002, 08:47 PM

lol. nazis i constantly mention? self-righteous? ok dude. i'm not the one who goes around replying to the posts of people i don't like insulting them. just fucking remember that the next time you start to think you're better than me.

11-01-2002, 08:44 PM	#58
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	ok this is something else i can't get over someone tell me what's wrong witht his pic. the winnar gets a hug http://161.58.208.54/artchive/l/leon...ari_sketch.jpg

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-01-2002, 07:58 PM	#34
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	and if i saw a thread entitled 'lol i love this' and i happened to click on it and see a painting, i would be pleasantly surprised. so thirdly i don't see what his fucking problem is. anyways. i don't even know why i read his post. i have him on ignore for a reason. it's just i guess that he was the only one who had replied althoug hexactly why i thought it would be a worthwhile reply is beyond me.

11-01-2002, 08:00 PM	#36
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth...de/joconde.jpg la joconde

11-01-2002, 08:01 PM	#37
Mayfuck Banned Location: i'm from japan also hollywood Posts: 57,812	http://www.artofcolour.com/in-depth/...-mona-lisa.JPG

11-01-2002, 08:13 PM	#49
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	and once again, i expect criticism/reactions to what i'm actually positing. in this case i posted a painting. i wasn't aware that i would receive criticism for the fact that i posted a painting. so just shut up. i wasn't aware there were fucking rules about how it's a big faux pas to post a piece by hans holbein. i wasn't aware it was a faux pas to disappoint poor dave's retarded brain by making him click on my thread only to see a painting (oh, the horror). seriously.

11-01-2002, 08:18 PM	#52
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	wow. saint augustine. http://www.masters-of-photography.co..._augustine.jpg this painting...i don't know. i';m sorta too depressed/irritated/whatever right now to explain it. but st augustine was so fucking weird. like. i don' tknow. and this painting just like. nevermind.

11-01-2002, 08:22 PM	#54
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	but ps isn't it sort of funny that this gay little turd duncan comes into MY thread, insults me, argues with me, then puts me on his ignore list? i mean what does he expect when he comes into a thread of mine? does he expect posts by me not to exist in a thread made by me? doesn't make much sense. and considering he started it in the first place. yeah. logical fallacies. irrational behaviour. i give up.

11-01-2002, 08:29 PM	#55
nothing matters Posts: n/a	that really rox!

11-01-2002, 08:40 PM	#57
noir cat Socialphobic Location: Hicksville, NY Posts: 11,699	Not to MENTION dave's wonderful sense of fashion!!!

11-01-2002, 08:47 PM	#60
Samsa Banned Location: A theater near you Posts: 7,929	lol. nazis i constantly mention? self-righteous? ok dude. i'm not the one who goes around replying to the posts of people i don't like insulting them. just fucking remember that the next time you start to think you're better than me.