2016 Presidential General Election Thread

[The Omega Concern]

This day was amusing.


Obama got exposed for lying about the Iranian hostage ransom (also something about an ISIS email msg sent to him).

Congress is hot after a perjury charge on Hillary.

Bunch of algorithms point to Trump victory.

Trump rolls with the top guy from Breitbart, likely cause Manafort is being exposed now with the Russian connect.

Even Dr. Drew got in the mix with his 'grave concern' over Hillary's health.


Annnd the nuttiest election of all time rolls on...

[JESUSNEEDSAHIT]

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

Bunch of algorithms point to Trump victory.

i remember my first beer

[ninsp]

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

This day was amusing.


Obama got exposed for lying about the Iranian hostage ransom (also something about an ISIS email msg sent to him).

Congress is hot after a perjury charge on Hillary.

Bunch of algorithms point to Trump victory.

Trump rolls with the top guy from Breitbart, likely cause Manafort is being exposed now with the Russian connect.

Even Dr. Drew got in the mix with his 'grave concern' over Hillary's health.


Annnd the nuttiest election of all time rolls on...

When polls are showing a hilarious Trump loss, guess you have to rely on "algorithms", eh?

[The Omega Concern]

Originally Posted by ninsp

When polls are showing a hilarious Trump loss, guess you have to rely on "algorithms", eh?

The polls aren't just rigged, they're cooked in her favor. The complicit media companies, proven and admitted propagandist for Hillary, are in lockstep desperately trying to control the narrative and give a reasonable scenario with false polls to then steal the election through electronic fraud and other means in an attempt to make it look plausible.

They just did it in the primaries and are forced to do it again in the general.

[The Omega Concern]

This man's math has predicted the last 5 elections and the model he uses has a 96% accuracy rate dating back to 1912.

He says Trump has a 87% chance of winning the election, but take heart Hillbots, that's down from 98% earlier this year.

I wonder if he's plugged in the factor of the DHS's wish to classify election booths as "critical infrastructure" to monitor election fraud? He should call it the "Fox in the Hen House" equation and run it through his algorithm...that's how Hillary wins, have the government ensure it by 'monitoring' the polls. lol.

[buzzard]

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

This man's math has predicted the last 5 elections and the model he uses has a 96% accuracy rate dating back to 1912.

He looks great for his age.

[JESUSNEEDSAHIT]

p ersonally i think a deez nurtz victory is likely

[JESUSNEEDSAHIT]

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

This man's math has predicted the last 5 elections and the model he uses has a 96% accuracy rate dating back to 1912.

He says Trump has a 87% chance of winning the election, but take heart Hillbots, that's down from 98% earlier this year.

I wonder if he's plugged in the factor of the DHS's wish to classify election booths as "critical infrastructure" to monitor election fraud? He should call it the "Fox in the Hen House" equation and run it through his algorithm...that's how Hillary wins, have the government ensure it by 'monitoring' the polls. lol.

if hillary wins you should quit netphoria

[redbreegull]

me in 2012 right after Obama victory

assuming Obama wins, where do you think the GOP will go next? Their target demographic is shrinking, but in the past four years the policy has been to double down on as much far-right lunacy as possible instead of growing the party base. It paid off in 2010, but I think that was a one time reaction against Obama. The Tea Party is thought of quite unfavorably by the majority of Americans. And they have reignited attacks on women's rights that haven't been a serious issue in decades. So what next? Will they finally get smart and start investing in the future by dropping the social fanaticism, or will they simply destroy themselves?

[ninsp]

Originally Posted by redbreegull

me in 2012 right after Obama victory

Were you jerking yourself off while quoting your post?

[Cool As Ice Cream]

five!

[Disco King]

Guys, the polls are rigged, and that's why they predict a Clinton victory.

When Trump wins in a landslide, that'll PROVE that the opinion polls are a Shillary/media collusion.

But if Clinton wins, that will PROVE that the polls were rigged, as WELL as the election.

It doesn't matter that a general election is nothing like a primary and is ridiculously hard for either party to rig because there are a shit-tonne of polling stations all over the country and debate dates are set years in advance. Clinton will just do the same to Trump that she did to Sanders! Also let's just ignore that, even though the DNC was stacked against Sanders and used every opportunity to handicap his campaign, he still lost by so many votes that it's hard to say that the Democratic primary was literally 'rigged,' it was just unethically lopsided.

What matters is that nobody can disprove my (unfalsifiable) position.

[redbreegull]

paul manafort has been called back to voldemort's side

[MyOneAndOnly]

remember 4 years ago when Karl Rove was on teevee the night of the election telling ppl that Romney would win becausae of polls!

LOL

[The Omega Concern]

Originally Posted by Disco King

Guys, the polls are rigged, and that's why they predict a Clinton victory.

When Trump wins in a landslide, that'll PROVE that the opinion polls are a Shillary/media collusion.

But if Clinton wins, that will PROVE that the polls were rigged, as WELL as the election.

It doesn't matter that a general election is nothing like a primary and is ridiculously hard for either party to rig because there are a shit-tonne of polling stations all over the country and debate dates are set years in advance. Clinton will just do the same to Trump that she did to Sanders! Also let's just ignore that, even though the DNC was stacked against Sanders and used every opportunity to handicap his campaign, he still lost by so many votes that it's hard to say that the Democratic primary was literally 'rigged,' it was just unethically lopsided.

What matters is that nobody can disprove my (unfalsifiable) position.

Nice try, but it doesn't fly when examining the truth of the matter. You keep regurgitating DNC talking points, the type they corresponded with the media to control the narrative. This man spoke on the record and PROVED electronic hacking in favor of Hillary all over New York. Should I link the lawsuits in California claiming the same?

[The Omega Concern]

And for good measure, there's this:




Now ask yourself why voting code is held behind state secrecy laws instead of being open sourced where members from all parties could audit the code to ensure its legitimacy.

[The Omega Concern]

ABC didn't have enough time prevent this screen shot.

[The Omega Concern]

And one of the most liberal websites on the net did an internet poll as well:


http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/poll-hillary-2016#56789


Do you plan on voting for Hillary Clinton for president in 2016?


303,000 votes.

261,000 NO!



Hurry up Hillbots...get over there and make Rachel Maddow proud before she melts down.

[MyOneAndOnly]

omg internet polls!

[The Omega Concern]

Originally Posted by Poots

looks like trump is up with msnbc.com visitors. BTW, how long does it take msnbc.com to generate that much web traffic? I'll bet it has taken since Christmas to get 300k votes.

At least as far back as March, if all those comments from left-wing democrats talking about Hillary's election fraud are from that poll. Those folks don't even have to vote for Trump to make it a plus for him, just so long as they stay #NeverHillary.


The problem the DNC and RNC/Neo-con forces face is that millions of each constituency see through the fraud and that includes the media cheerleading it on as they push it all on the masses. There are metrics and data that match the reality on the ground and line up with what has been revealed about internal polling, which intel sources claim had Sanders and Trump over 60% through the primaries.


Then there's death by a thousand cuts from all the leaks as their crimes are exposed now. It's desperate times for the elite, but I ain't counting them out. Geopolitically is where the real hot water is for them, but the boiling is through the U.S. election as the pressure mounts around the change to that seat of power.

[ninsp]

why do you post here

do you think you're going to turn us all into GOP supporters?

[buzzard]

I'm beginning to wonder what your standard for "actual research" is.

[MyOneAndOnly]

why do you come here?
why do you hang around?

[iB0lly]

Who am i?
Why am i here?

[ninsp]

Originally Posted by Poots

If you read his posts, TOC is just as critical of the Bushes as he is the Clintons. He's anti-establishment, independent of party affiliations. Everyone says he's crazy, but he's the only person here doing actual research beyond CNN or Fox News. And he was spot on with the Democratic screwjob of Bernie, though no one here would give him the credit afterwards.

everyone knew Bernie was getting the screws

[iB0lly]

Originally Posted by ninsp

everyone knew Bernie was getting the screws

Nice try at rewriting history but there was no concrete evidence of it until the DNCC emails were released. So actually, no one knew Bernie was being played, including Bernie himself.

[Elphenor]

We already went over this but the election wasn't "rigged"

That's omega's stance

What happened is the establishment was biased towards the established candidate (gasp what a shocker) leading to things like questionable rule interpretations and conflicts of interest

It is clear that the majority of dem voters favored Clinton anyhow

[Disco King]

Originally Posted by Poots

You can't cheat in a footrace and then say "well I won by so much anyway I didn't need to cheat; it's so obvious I'm faster than you."

Well, if you cheated by getting a three second head start, and then proceeded to win by eight seconds, yeah, logically, you would have to conclude that you are faster than your opponent.

[Elphenor]

But Hillary would have been dominating by the time she reached CA anyway considering almost no one in the southern states even considered Bernie

[Elphenor]

We know that he may have won Cali at best but that's a stretch (a really big one)

But you realize he didn't have to just win Cali he had to dominate it

So yeah