online porn distorting behaviour of boys and girls

[Cool As Ice Cream]

Originally Posted by The exploding boy

id like to know why vix is opposed to anal in general though.

A GP, let's call her Sue, said: "their bodies are simply not designed for that."

Good thing this gp is anonymous. That really helps.

[The exploding boy]

Only the younger girls bodies though.

[Mayfuck]

The article vixnix posted isn't an op ed against sex education for children. It is about girls as young as 12 and 13 being coerced into doing things they don't want to by boys who are learning these things from pornography. Are you guys saying you're okay with this or did you just not read the article?

[Mayfuck]

Anyone else observing things here should note the ugly irony of eulogy bashing jczeroman for opposing net neutrality but frothing at the mouth when suggested that the sex industry should also be regulated.

[Mo]

What was the sex-ed program on The West Wing called again? Anything But(t)?

[Shallowed]

Originally Posted by duovamp

I mean kids don't even have access to porn unless their parents buy them mobile phones and data plans or computers and Internet connections.

Seriously, what a dumb fucking argument.

[Shallowed]

Originally Posted by Mayfuck

The article vixnix posted isn't an op ed against sex education for children. It is about girls as young as 12 and 13 being coerced into doing things they don't want to by boys who are learning these things from pornography. Are you guys saying you're okay with this or did you just not read the article?

Oh yeah, if there's one thing we all advocate, it's young girls being coerced into sexual acts that they don't really want to do

re: is everyone a slut in here thread

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Mayfuck

Anyone else observing things here should note the ugly irony of eulogy bashing jczeroman for opposing net neutrality but frothing at the mouth when suggested that the sex industry should also be regulated.

Lol what it should absolutely be regulated.

[Eulogy]

You know why boys are coercing girls into doing things they don't want to do?

BECAUSE NO ONE TEACHES KIDS ANYTHING.

Not because of porn. Good God.

[Eulogy]

If you can't have a conversation with your eleven or twelve year old boy about consent, or if we can't agree that that is a subject that must be taught at that age, then that is the fucking problem.

The same "oh think of the children!" idiots are the ones who won't allow them to be taught the things they need to know.

[Eulogy]

Much easier to blame it on sleazy online porn then to take an inward look at our abject failures as a society.

[Eulogy]

I like how Julio misunderstands basic concepts so completely as to think I don't want the sex industry regulated. Like. What?

I am not defending all porn, by the way. A lot of straight porn ads I see while getting to my stuff disturb me a lot. But that's a different conversation.

[Eulogy]

And how poots things teaching consent is the equivalent of showing piss porn to kids.

[Eulogy]

As if piss porn is more harmful than a movie with a bunch of violent murders.

[Eulogy]

which maybe it is I dunno. But like

Killing is bad

Pissing On people who don't wanna be pissed on is bad

[Eulogy]

Why are we so terrified of such a basic human act

[Eulogy]

Vixnix what would you think if your boys had a subject in school where they spent a lot of time teaching consent?

[The exploding boy]

FLOOD ALERT

Call a mod guys. Oh wait.

[Cool As Ice Cream]

pissing on people is a basic human act
ok
i'm going to piss on some children now to teach them that
WHY ARE YOU SO TERRIFIED
maybe your parents didn't tell you about pissing on people and are blaming porn; well then it's their fault
the government should regulate this

[Eulogy]

Should have been clearer lol.

[Eulogy]

I don't think pissing on people is a basic human act

But it is less harmful than murder.

Sex is a basic human act though and we should be able to talk about it. Especially with kids who have reproductive capabilities.

[duovamp]

Originally Posted by Mayfuck

The article vixnix posted isn't an op ed against sex education for children. It is about girls as young as 12 and 13 being coerced into doing things they don't want to by boys who are learning these things from pornography. Are you guys saying you're okay with this or did you just not read the article?

The cause is cited as pornography.

[Mayfuck]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

Something will affect my child and I don't wanna talk to them about it SO BAN IT

No fuck you I like my internet porn thank you very much

Do you realize how libertarian that sounds though?

"Gas guzzling vehicles will affect my lungs/the environment and I don't want have to tell everyone not to buy them SO REGULATE IT OUT OF EXISTENCE

No fuck you I like my Hummer thank you very much"

[Mayfuck]

While it is absolutely a parent's duty to teach their kids right from wrong, parents also have a right to expect their children not be harmed from others who weren't taught right from wrong. That is where society steps in and why parental education can only go so far. Restricting access to porn should be an urgent priority among politicians, internet providers, and companies like google whose search engines are a portal to these things.

[duovamp]

Even if pornography causes coercion and butt stuff, why would parents not have any involvement or responsibility for their children?

Parents aren't responsible for kids watching porn? Parents aren't responsible for their kids thinking coercion is okay?

[duovamp]

Pornography is adult entertainment. Not intended for children. Who's fault is it that children get their hands on it?

[Mayfuck]

Streaming sites should absolutely be done away with. Would you agree with that, Eulogy?

There is very little oversight on these sites. It is user uploaded content, meaning lots of "home video" and "amateur" video, and as such there is no guarantee the participants consented to their sex acts being viewed publicly. There is also no way to guarantee anyone in those videos are over 18. There is no way to verify that someone's sex video is not in fact a video taped rape. And one cannot "ethically consume" material by avoiding videos they suspect are harmful because the way advertising revenue works for such streaming sites is that it used to keep all videos uploaded regardless if you click on them or not.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Mayfuck

Do you realize how libertarian that sounds though?

"Gas guzzling vehicles will affect my lungs/the environment and I don't want have to tell everyone not to buy them SO REGULATE IT OUT OF EXISTENCE

No fuck you I like my Hummer thank you very much"

We can't teach the environment about what the gas guzzler is doing to the atmosphere

Bad analogy is bad. Try again maybe.

Like, this board is harmful to children. Should we just get rid of the Internet because parents are too scared to talk to their children about sex?

[duovamp]

Originally Posted by Mayfuck

Streaming sites should absolutely be done away with. Would you agree with that, Eulogy?

There is very little oversight on these sites. It is user uploaded content, meaning lots of "home video" and "amateur" video, and as such there is no guarantee the participants consented to their sex acts being viewed publicly. There is also no way to guarantee anyone in those videos are over 18. There is no way to verify that someone's sex video is not in fact a video taped rape. And one cannot "ethically consume" material by avoiding videos they suspect are harmful because the way advertising revenue works for such streaming sites is that it used to keep all videos uploaded regardless if you click on them or not.

Even subscription sites could still have user submitted content.

And what about free speech for those who want to share their amature videos or profit from them?

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Mayfuck

Streaming sites should absolutely be done away with. Would you agree with that, Eulogy?

There is very little oversight on these sites. It is user uploaded content, meaning lots of "home video" and "amateur" video, and as such there is no guarantee the participants consented to their sex acts being viewed publicly. There is also no way to guarantee anyone in those videos are over 18. There is no way to verify that someone's sex video is not in fact a video taped rape. And one cannot "ethically consume" material by avoiding videos they suspect are harmful because the way advertising revenue works for such streaming sites is that it used to keep all videos uploaded regardless if you click on them or not.

Yes I do largely agree with this. But I do use streaming sites... But only to steal videos from legitimate studios (shhhhhh).

Porn needs to be better regulated. But it can't be because, ew sex. Apparently.