Indiana hates gays

[Eulogy]

What are you looking for me to argue about?

That discrimination against gays is bad? Or that the civil rights act provides a proper framework for addressing anti-gay discrimination?

[Elphenor]

It feels like more of his anarcho-capitalist religion

Protection of your rights doesn't matter as long as it's buis infringing on it and not the Gov

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Poots

Great, you found a reasonable model to base your anti-gay discrimination law on. Now if you'll stop with the gay=race thing, you might get people's ear.

I posted a link to a list of protected classes and you ignored it.

[Eulogy]

If you want your hand held here I don't really have the time to do that

[Mayfuck]

Originally Posted by Poots

anarcho-primitivist, you smug little shit.

Well no wonder you have no grasp on structural oppression. Or reality for that matter.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Poots

No, I'm well aware of the presently protected classes in this country. My point is that shouldn't you try to give reasons why gays should be on the list other than:
1. duh, it's obvious
2. race, sex, etc. are on it

You argument seems to be "the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects... not gays" which is a terrible argument. It would be great if it did protect gays, but it doesn't. Yes, it would be a great model for a future law protecting gays, but that's not an argument why it should be a law.

So you're saying I need to walk you through why discriminating against people on the basis of sexual orientation in public accommodations, employment, etc. should be prohibited by law.

Because it's wrong on its face? Because homosexuals broadly speaking constitute a discrete and insular minority that is currently frequently targeted for discrimination based on animus or lack of understanding? Because gay people deserve equal protection under the law?

That's all the hand holding I'll do for today. Read a fucking book or something.

[MyOneAndOnly]

put him on ignore along with fuzzy. makes everything about netphoria better

[Eulogy]

He sounds like someone who just got out of a freshman intro philosophy course

[Mayfuck]

almost makes me miss corganist. at least he wasn't this virulent in being this disingenuous.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Poots

So you're going back to reason #1? Have fun convincing America with that line of logic.

So my second paragraph means nothing more to you than "duh?"

K. Simpleton.

[Eulogy]

And like convincing America is the standard of logical argumentation. Good god. Just stop posting please.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Poots

You might be the only person on here who is hated as much as fuzzy and I. Welcome to the jungle, GMO man.

This is a pretty bad misreading of problems people have with scotty. You're not in tune with board consensus. Don't pretend to be.

You're the new banana. Banana without car selfies.

[MyOneAndOnly]

[Trotskilicious]

shut the fuck up scotty

[Eulogy]

Yes but you're a prick and you're aggressively stupid. Bad combo.

[Eulogy]

Allow me to reiterate

Originally Posted by Eulogy

So you're saying I need to walk you through why discriminating against people on the basis of sexual orientation in public accommodations, employment, etc. should be prohibited by law.

Because it's wrong on its face? Because homosexuals broadly speaking constitute a discrete and insular minority that is currently frequently targeted for discrimination based on animus or lack of understanding? Because gay people deserve equal protection under the law?

That's all the hand holding I'll do for today. Read a fucking book or something.

[Eulogy]

What's the reasoning behind not discriminating against any particular group of people, poots

[Eulogy]

And if my goal was to bring around every single idiot american to believing that discriminating against gay people is wrong I wouldn't be talking about a goddamn law making it illegal to do so

[Eulogy]

At this point I'm not even sure you read my posts