best netphorian as a human being

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by Graveflower

basically generic indie rock
the strokes, pedro the lion, elliott smith, sonic youth, silver jews, low all stand out from what i remember
i think she had a veruca salt cd but youthful transgressions can be forgiven

her great taste in art as a whole more than makes up for this, though, this can be easily excused

I think DeviousJ's asexuality might preclude him from being in here. It's a little weird. I understand that maybe it's just that he doesn't like posting personal issues which isn't a bad thing but nobody knows anything about him as a person and how he lives his life except for that thing I uncovered on an immigration board where it turned out he was trying to live in the U.S. with Lie and Shparticus for a couple years.

LDS we know he has a girlfriend, a steady job, all that. Plus he's just incredibly attractive and I would want him to be part of a repopulation effort.

[2Marlon2Brando]

mxzombie

[aurel]

Originally Posted by sleeper

he is a libertarian though and his taste is music is definitely on the weak side

The libertarian thing doesn't bother me but what are we talking on the music front

Mariner isnt just a libertarian, he consitently reveals himself to have just the worst tendencies of libertarians. Just completely insensitive and oblivious to circumstances. That every man for himself mentality that turned me off entirely from libertarianism.

[Shapan]

Originally Posted by Ever

Prfft religion is for chumps.

Massive generalization here but I've noticed that the more religous people have seemingly cut off the part of their brain that accepts difference. What I mean by this is that any mention of pain or something at all 'dark' is completely ignored, in one ear out the other. It's incredibly amusing when you're alone wiht one of these people and you just keep persisting in a very distressful topic waiting for them to snap. I'm such a jerk I made this kid called Adam from school cry like that.

By the way the type of topic I talk about is the type we are discussing here, get the level of darkness?

i can only tolerate very religious people when i know they're tolerant of all other religions. i of course it's kind of a contradiction because it seems no religion is really tolerant of another. i do think religion can be healthy for certain people who use it as a crutch to some degree, but i could never understand fanatics.

i went to catholic school from 1st grade through high school, in 2nd grade i asked the priest that visited us what was going to happen to me considering i wasnt baptized. it took him 20 seconds to come up with an answer, some baptism through your mind crap. since then i had my doubts in holding any specific religious beliefs, and from there its slowly just because a general belief in God. the older ive gotten the more ridiculous specific religious schemes have seemed to me, and some of that has happened during my posting in netphoria.

[dean_r_koontz]

the happiest person wins, no matter how bad a human being. that's good to remember.

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by Graveflower

I think DeviousJ's asexuality might preclude him from being in here. It's a little weird. I understand that maybe it's just that he doesn't like posting personal issues which isn't a bad thing but nobody knows anything about him as a person and how he lives his life except for that thing I uncovered on an immigration board where it turned out he was trying to live in the U.S. with Lie and Shparticus for a couple years.

LDS we know he has a girlfriend, a steady job, all that. Plus he's just incredibly attractive and I would want him to be part of a repopulation effort.

the guy doesnt post about anything remotely personal so its hard to just focus on why he doesnt talk about his dick size or some girls hes chasing or whatever, that cant really mean, let alone much bad. on the whole, people talk much too much about their personal lives on here and its no surprise that it so often ends up in some kind of disaster


lds is a charming young man and, yes, his looks would be a plus for the re-population. the fact that you described him as "incredibly attractive", though, makes me wonder about you. its likely that youre a fag


which reminds me

4. fags

nothing wrong with fags as people but, hey, if theyre not willing to breed for the good of human kind than they cant be a part of this special mission

[Shapan]

Originally Posted by Graveflower

Mariner isnt just a libertarian, he consitently reveals himself to have just the worst tendencies of libertarians. Just completely insensitive and oblivious to circumstances. That every man for himself mentality that turned me off entirely from libertarianism.

so would politics be another category?

Originally Posted by Shapan

healthy for certain people who use it as a crutch.

Isn't using something as a crutch unhealthy?

[aurel]

I see. Is it that stop whining and pull yourself up by your bootstraps regardless of circumstances bullshit?

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by aurel

The libertarian thing doesn't bother me but what are we talking on the music front

isnt he big into like prog rock and shit? maybe im confusing him with someone else


he is a seafarer though. i dont know. is that a bad thing? theyre usually a bit insane

[tcm]

Originally Posted by sleeper

did i really?

shit, i just looked it up

"barred" woudlve been right

but thats alright because im out of the running anyways

oh, there is debarred. that's pretty close and makes as much sense etymologically, doesn't it. i just wanted to put an end to this before it got out of hand.

Originally Posted by sleeper

the guy doesnt post about anything remotely personal so its hard to just focus on why he doesnt talk about his dick size or some girls hes chasing or whatever, that cant really mean, let alone much bad. on the whole, people talk much too much about their personal lives on here and its no surprise that it so often ends up in some kind of disaster

Yeah I mentioned that he doesn't reveal anything personal besides that. It just makes him kind of a wild card. From my creepy research (googling negabenji, it was the first result) he was unemployed for a long while which was part of the reason he wasn't able to go to the U.S.

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by Shapan

i can only tolerate very religious people when i know they're tolerant of all other religions. i of course it's kind of a contradiction because it seems no religion is really tolerant of another. i do think religion can be healthy for certain people who use it as a crutch to some degree, but i could never understand fanatics.

i went to catholic school from 1st grade through high school, in 2nd grade i asked the priest that visited us what was going to happen to me considering i wasnt baptized. it took him 20 seconds to come up with an answer, some baptism through your mind crap. since then i had my doubts in holding any specific religious beliefs, and from there its slowly just because a general belief in God. the older ive gotten the more ridiculous specific religious schemes have seemed to me, and some of that has happened during my posting in netphoria.

just be sure to separate in your mind religion and spirituality. dont think that you have to be religious to believe in something divine or whatever. people so often try and act like if you believe in god than youre automatically a chrisitian. theyre entirely independent

[Shapan]

Originally Posted by Graveflower

Isn't using something as a crutch unhealthy?

yeah i thought of that, probably why i didnt go into more detail with the pros.

some people are just very weak, they're raised under certain circumstances, and they need something to fall back on, and they use religion for that. its not necessarily a good thing, but it feel like these kind of people will always be there. i guess im still dealing with the entire question of religion, i think ive had a few threads about it on here even. but im glad im questioning it.

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by Shapan

so would politics be another category?

i think it would be ideally, but it would be impossible to really settle this so maybe its best that its excluded. or, rather, that the same kind of process of elimination rules apply. someone wouldnt need subscribe to some particular political beliefs, but they would need to not subscribe to some particular religious beleifs. i cant see some neo nazi or whatever being elected by god to the top post

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by tcm

oh, there is debarred. that's pretty close and makes as much sense etymologically, doesn't it. i just wanted to put an end to this before it got out of hand.

youre really big into arrows, am i wrong? interesting fetish

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by Shapan

yeah i thought of that, probably why i didnt go into more detail with the pros.

some people are just very weak, they're raised under certain circumstances, and they need something to fall back on, and they use religion for that. its not necessarily a good thing, but it feel like these kind of people will always be there. i guess im still dealing with the entire question of religion, i think ive had a few threads about it on here even. but im glad im questioning it.

so, at least, theres a correlation between choosing religion and being weak. we dont think weakness is a good quality for this person to have so on these grounds if not any other religious people are out of the running. we dont need any weak lunatics jamming things up

[tcm]

Originally Posted by sleeper

which reminds me

4. fags

nothing wrong with fags as people but, hey, if theyre not willing to breed for the good of human kind than they cant be a part of this special mission

i'm sure a righteous fag would do what needed be done for the sake of the species even though he would get no carnal gratification from it.

[aurel]

Anyone who has posted ego-stroking videos of themselves 'shredding' on guitar must be disba..... i mean, should be directed to the suicide booths.

[Ever]

Originally Posted by Shapan

some people are just very weak, they're raised under certain circumstances, and they need something to fall back on, and they use religion for that. its not necessarily a good thing, but it feel like these kind of people will always be there. i guess im still dealing with the entire question of religion, i think ive had a few threads about it on here even. but im glad im questioning it.

Yeah part of what makes religion enticing is by promising a great deal and making it acheivable to everyone by having goals already set out for them and goals that are accomplished through a little, often times arbitrary, work. With this considered it's easy to see how religion in the form of formalized organizations has provided what it has to society.

But I'm not sure if that's just promoting weakness in character, or if promoting anything at all. In either case I find it stupid that people need religion in the first place and can't find their own spirituality to guide them in times that may be more troublesome or in times where guidance is neccessary.

[aurel]

Look, even God hates religion.

[Ever]

Originally Posted by sleeper

just be sure to separate in your mind religion and spirituality. dont think that you have to be religious to believe in something divine or whatever. people so often try and act like if you believe in god than youre automatically a chrisitian. theyre entirely independent

Yeah, totally agreed, this should be a given universal truth and taught at schools.

[mistle]

Originally Posted by Graveflower

..that turned me off entirely from libertarianism.

?

Did I make some severe grammatical errors in there that I'm not seeing?

[yo soy el mejor]

alexthestampede

[sleeper]

Originally Posted by tcm

i'm sure a righteous fag would do what needed be done for the sake of the species even though he would get no carnal gratification from it.

if the guy is willing to make that sacrifice than i think its alright that he be allowed into the running, i agree

[mistle]

Originally Posted by Graveflower

Did I make some severe grammatical errors in there that I'm not seeing?

i was curious if that's to say you were turned on to libertarianism

[aurel]

Originally Posted by sleeper

if the guy is willing to make that sacrifice than i think its alright that he be allowed into the running, i agree

I dunno. People will say anything to secure that place in the bunker. What if it comes to the crunch and he can't get it up? A virile young hetro horndog is much more logical.