Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby - wow

[Shapan]

it was alright, i wish they wouldve utilized sasha baron cohen a bit more. that man is hilarious, my friend saw a borat screening at comic con and said it was the funniest movie hes ever seen.

[Mo]

Kids was alright, but Ken Park was better, IMO.

[I'm Hardcore]

hey guys did you ever see Mr.Deeds? man that Adam Sandler is an awesome actor!!

[Mooney]

i went to see it, expecting it to be really dumb. expecting nothing, it was somehow still worse than i was anticipating. my friend really wanted to see it, and we had missed every other start time at the theater. he loves elf, anchorman, and every adam sandler movie ever made and he still didn't like it.

[Ugly]

point still stands: Gary Gole & Ali G own in this movie. But having your supporting cast own you is not a good sign.

[neopryn]

Originally Posted by I'm Hardcore

hey guys did you ever see Mr.Deeds? man that Adam Sandler is an awesome actor!!

This is like saying 2001 sucks because Battlefield Earth sucks.

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by Ugly

Directed by Adam McKay (40 Year Old Virgin)

i'm going to need to see your credentials, al

[duovamp]

I saw Punch Drunk Love for the first time last night. Adam Sandler != Adam Sandler in Punch Drunk Love.

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

I can't believe people expected that movie to be at all good. Come on, it looked ridiculous. Sure, it may have been slightly humorous at times or perhaps entertaining as the plot picked up, but there's absolutely no chance in hell it will have any socially redeeming quality or anything like that. Really, to those who haven't seen it, how good do you seriously think it will be?

you're an idiot

[duovamp]

And you're quoting one. What's that make you?

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

I saw Punch Drunk Love for the first time last night. Adam Sandler != Adam Sandler in Punch Drunk Love.

what does that even mean

[duovamp]

I didn't think C++ was THAT esoteric.

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by sppunk

Neither did Kids, but it was good.

Kids is one of the worst movies ever made

Harmony Korine should be committed and that creepy fuck Larry Clark should be in jail being raped on a daily basis

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by I'm Hardcore

and you've listed Anchorman and Old School as being good movies, so shut the fuck up yourself

you've made over 2,000 posts and somehow thought they were good

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by Ugly

COULD USE MORE FUNNY FUEL
** out of *****

There's this really great joke on Family Guy about Will Farrell. Stewie is watching the remake of Bewitched and sees a lame joke. He flies all the way down to L.A. to ring Will Farrell's doorbell. Farrell opens up the door and Stewie immediately smacks the crap out of him, snarling, "That's NOT FUNNY!" You kind of feel like doing what Stewie did after watching Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby. The movie is like watching somebody bang their head against the wall repeatedly to get a chuckle. You may laugh at it once in awhile but overall it's just painful.

PRO TIP:

Don't namedrop Family Guy while trying to make a case for something else not being funny

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

And you're quoting one. What's that make you?

wtf?

[neopryn]

WFMU just owned the fuck out of this thread

[duovamp]

Just stop... Let him inflate his post count in peace.

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

Exactly. Your taste in movies clearly blows if you think Anchorman should be on the same list of "good"ness as A Clockwork Orange. Furthermore, A Clockwork Orange actually had depth.

i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level

a clockwork orange is about as deep as a larry the cable guy routine
it beats you over the head with its satire and whatever amazingly deep socially relevant points it's making about violence, society, the nature of man or whatever are obvious to any idiot

and it's a great movie :)

[wounded]

eh i liked it..it was what i expected and i laughed...especially at the cougar for some reason and especially at

"if you don't like big red then fuck you" and "did you see that? that just happened"

the kids were kind of annoying though, until reese said he would put one in the microwave

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

Just stop... Let him inflate his post count in peace.

i noticed you have nothing to actually say to me
you know why that is? because my balls are in your mouth.

[neopryn]

duovamp why don't you list your favorite films and explain how they all benefitted society

[duovamp]

Originally Posted by WFMU

you've made over 2,000 posts and somehow thought they were good

This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.

Originally Posted by WFMU

PRO TIP:

Don't namedrop Family Guy while trying to make a case for something else not being funny

PRO TIP: The word "from" meant it was a review FROM somebody else. He himself did not write the review but rather posted it and said it was not his own. You didn't catch that, but, of course, you're a jackass, as we can all plainly see.

Originally Posted by WFMU

wtf?

If I'm an idiot, then why not ignore me? Instead you throw my quotes around like they're Socrates's words. Do not quote me if you think I'm an idiot. Just ignore me.

Originally Posted by WFMU

i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level

a clockwork orange is about as deep as a larry the cable guy routine
it beats you over the head with its satire and whatever amazingly deep socially relevant points it's making about violence, society, the nature of man or whatever are obvious to any idiot

and it's a great movie

ACO was by no measurable means similar to Anchorman, as was my point. You missed it, but, then again, you don't catch much, do you?

Originally Posted by WFMU

i noticed you have nothing to actually say to me
you know why that is? because my balls are in your mouth.

I have much to say to you, but I'd rather compact it into one post as opposed to spamming posts like a rabid animal that desperately wants to get up to 1000 posts, as if that puny number even mattered to people with 30k+. Also, I see you still don't know what != means, you didn't reply to it, by your logic since you did not reply, my testicles were placed in your mouth. How odd, I don't remember putting them there, so I assume you put them there yourself. Have a nice day, I'll not be reading anything you post on this thread for though it has proven funny, it has not been enjoyable.

[neopryn]

Originally Posted by duovamp

PRO TIP: The word "from" meant it was a review FROM somebody else. He himself did not write the review but rather posted it and said it was not his own. You didn't catch that, but, of course, you're an idiot, as we can all plainly see.

hahahaha

quit while you're behind chief

[duovamp]

Huh.

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.

the fuck are you tripping on, hoss?

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

ACO was by no measurable means similar to Anchorman, as was my point. You missed it, but, then again, you don't catch much, do you?

your point is that OH SHIT LOOK OUT MY BALLS ARE IN YOUR MOUTH

get over yourself, u fat fuck


i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level
i don't think calling completely different movies "good" is putting them on the same level

u know what i mean?
spunk is an idiot himself and obviously just threw ACO in there as a controversial selection of a movie that is generally held to be a classic, but saying that anchorman and a clockwork orange are both good isn't really saying they're similar movies

i mean he said that neither of them have any socially redeeming qualities (which seems to be all u want in a movie. u must like Crash a lot) which is actually true

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by duovamp

PRO TIP: The word "from" meant it was a review FROM somebody else. He himself did not write the review but rather posted it and said it was not his own. You didn't catch that, but, of course, you're a jackass, as we can all plainly see.

This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.
This was never conveyed. You made this up and tried to turn around a comment that was neither about you or involved you. Do shut up.

damn
i just made u my son.
sit down son

[WFMU]

Originally Posted by Ugly

John C. Riley, usually a character actor reserved for dark and dramatic supporting roles, is the comedic foil as Ricky Bobby's buddy. Riley isn't bad, but he seems out of his element when up against some comedic regulars. Sometimes casting against type works, but Riley’s case you're just wondering why they didn't' cast a comedic regular, lets say Rob Schneider, in a role that probably could have gotten more laughs than what it did.

u seen boogie nights dog?

[WFMU]

wait rob schneider? what the fuck?