DC Circuit rules subsidies for people buying insurance on fed exchanges is unlawful

[Eulogy]

Oh, not drunk enough now?

[Trotskilicious]

are you talking to me

[Eulogy]

Yes, homophobic 3:52 am poster who the fuck else would I be talking to.

[Eulogy]

Shall I repeat this for you, shitstain?

Originally Posted by Eulogy

And anyway, can you imagine what it's like to have legislators at the local, state, and national levels going on television on a daily basis and expressing a desire to codify the right to discriminate against you? And have, oh I dunno, 40% of the country share that view?

People can compare gay people to alcoholics and murderers and still show up on meet the fucking press.

It is still acceptable in modern american political discourse to support the legal and political oppression of gay people. The fact that we are having some sort of cultural "moment" where we show up on a couple more tv shows doesn't change that.

I can also say all this while recognizing that I am not a black person in Selma in the '60s (or a black person now or a woman or a trans person. I'm not trying to start the oppression Olympics)

And again, you do not get to be the arbiter of what is important enough to bitch about. You still won't respond to the fact that the Supreme Court directly affects the things even you care about. What's the deal? Just over everything because we're space dust?

[Future Boy]

anyone else lost on this whole trotsky-the homophobe stuff

[Elphenor]

I think it came from his use of "sexual preference" which could be taken to imply that homosexuality is a choice.

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by Future Boy

anyone else lost on this whole trotsky-the homophobe stuff

eulogy is hilarious because he says charmbag thinks all men are misogynists but his trigger for "homophobe" comes with such ease he looks like he's mental

it's getting real tiresome, how he came back and was nice for about 40 seconds before he starts setting up idiotic threads like the one entitled charmbag and then here in this thread when i'm ranting about cosmic scope he thinks it's an attack on his fucking sexuality because he seems not to understand it. it's like if you confuse him he doesn't seek clarity, he just goes on the attack

i'm not sure how "your lives are of no consequence, do whatever you want" is some kind of attack on homosexuality.

[Future Boy]

Originally Posted by Elphenor

I think it came from his use of "sexual preference" which could be taken to imply that homosexuality is a choice.

no he said its come up before

[Future Boy]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

it's getting real tiresome, how he came back and was nice for about 40 seconds before he starts setting up idiotic threads like the one entitled charmbag and then here in this thread when i'm ranting about cosmic scope he thinks it's an attack on his fucking sexuality because he seems not to understand it. it's like if you confuse him he doesn't seek clarity, he just goes on the attack

yeah, no shit

ties into my post about him wonderfully though, all here in one page

[Trotskilicious]

i made a thread about being uncomfortable with going to a gay bar because it's not for me. so now i hate gays and i want them to die and i'm scared of them and i don't like them and i want them to be assimilated. or whatever.

i went to a gay bar last week, the music sucked

i don't go to tejano bars either, i don't hate mexicans.

[Eulogy]

It was in a pm. Maybe I'll dig it up later. Feel free to address any substantive points while you wait.

[Eulogy]

And I didn't come back? I never left?

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Future Boy

yeah, no shit

ties into my post about him wonderfully though, all here in one page

The two of you just completely ignore everything I say. I ask direct questions that you don't want to answer so instead you just accuse me of being crazy.

Pretty transparent.

[Eulogy]

One more time!

Originally Posted by Eulogy

And anyway, can you imagine what it's like to have legislators at the local, state, and national levels going on television on a daily basis and expressing a desire to codify the right to discriminate against you? And have, oh I dunno, 40% of the country share that view?

People can compare gay people to alcoholics and murderers and still show up on meet the fucking press.

It is still acceptable in modern american political discourse to support the legal and political oppression of gay people. The fact that we are having some sort of cultural "moment" where we show up on a couple more tv shows doesn't change that.

I can also say all this while recognizing that I am not a black person in Selma in the '60s (or a black person now or a woman or a trans person. I'm not trying to start the oppression Olympics)

And again, you do not get to be the arbiter of what is important enough to bitch about. You still won't respond to the fact that the Supreme Court directly affects the things even you care about. What's the deal? Just over everything because we're space dust?

[Future Boy]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

The two of you just completely ignore everything I say. I ask direct questions that you don't want to answer so instead you just accuse me of being crazy.

Pretty transparent.

what about all the others you end up doing the same thing to

which is everyone

[Future Boy]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

i don't hate mexicans.

thats only because you like the food

Pretty transparent.

[Trotskilicious]

oh my god the food is so gooooooooooooooooooooood

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

One more time!

I do not want to talk to you, your "debates" are not productive and involve nothing but namecalling and splitting hairs

now you're threatening to use PMs against me

nobody cares, do it

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

Issues of civil rights for minorities are comparable. Not directly so. But comparable. The fact that gay people make you uncomfortable doesn't change that.

It's a matter of the rights of a minority group being determined by the majority. It is always wrong, in any form.

Originally Posted by Eulogy

And anyway, can you imagine what it's like to have legislators at the local, state, and national levels going on television on a daily basis and expressing a desire to codify the right to discriminate against you? And have, oh I dunno, 40% of the country share that view?

People can compare gay people to alcoholics and murderers and still show up on meet the fucking press.

It is still acceptable in modern american political discourse to support the legal and political oppression of gay people. The fact that we are having some sort of cultural "moment" where we show up on a couple more tv shows doesn't change that.

I can also say all this while recognizing that I am not a black person in Selma in the '60s (or a black person now or a woman or a trans person. I'm not trying to start the oppression Olympics)

And again, you do not get to be the arbiter of what is important enough to bitch about. You still won't respond to the fact that the Supreme Court directly affects the things even you care about. What's the deal? Just over everything because we're space dust?

Where is the name calling and splitting hairs? I just want you to respond to these posts. I don't want to debate you or argue with you. You can have the last word. This will be my last post in the thread.

[Cool As Ice Cream]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

This will be my last post in the thread.

lol yeah right good one ahahahahahaha

[Cool As Ice Cream]

"And I didn't come back? I never left?"

[null123]

Can we do a thread where we each do a dramatic reading of one of our own posts? Preferably an effort post with some emotion in it?

[MyOneAndOnly]

Originally Posted by Charmbag

Can we do a thread where we each do a dramatic reading of one of our own posts? Preferably an effort post with some emotion in it?

only if CAIC reads mine and RBG reads Trots'

[hnibos]

Originally Posted by Charmbag

Can we do a thread where we each do a dramatic reading of one of our own posts? Preferably an effort post with some emotion in it?

Yes.

[FutureBoy]

I want to see who could bait eulogy into posting again

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by scottytheoneand

only if CAIC reads mine and RBG reads Trots'

i will read eulogy's

[reprise85]

i should read esty or something

who is the antireprise? banana?