So after several pages of various red herring arguments, does anyone actually want to address some of the questions I have asked. I'd like to think that I've asked them in good faith:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jczeroman
Why should a company which takes up the largest portion of bandwidth in the United States get to have that share of the market without paying a premium? I don't understand why Netflix shouldn't have to pay for dominating web traffic like that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jczeroman
Moreover, I do not see how making the single largest user of US internet traffic pay a premium is somehow equivalent to "ISPs have the ability to throttle or outright block what I want to do on the web on a whim".
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jczeroman
Convince me that this is even remotely in the realm of possibility. This is wild speculation and does little to convince me that net neutrality isn't about solving a problem that doesn't actually exist.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jczeroman
I'm glad to discuss what *is*. Tell me what I'm missing.
|