|
|
Register | Netphoria's Amazon.com Link | Members List |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-01-2007, 06:07 PM | #1 |
Apocalyptic Poster
Posts: 1,019
|
Obama willing to invade Pakistan in al-Qaeda hunt
|
|
08-01-2007, 06:22 PM | #2 |
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
So Obama wants to unconditionally talk to countries that we're on not-so-good terms with (Iran, Syria, North Korea, etc.)...and invade countries we are on halfway decent terms with? That makes perfect sense.
Obama is in way over his head. |
|
08-01-2007, 06:25 PM | #3 |
Immortal
Location: like liutenant dan i'm rollin'
Posts: 21,016
|
i'm torn between my agreeance with corganist and my dislike of him
|
|
08-01-2007, 06:27 PM | #4 |
Pledge
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 58
|
Obama is really fucking his chances of getting elected now. He'll be a good VP to Hillary.
|
|
08-01-2007, 06:56 PM | #5 | |
Fine! I'll go make my own
web site. With Blackjack, and Hookers... Actually, forget the web site. Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,820
|
Quote:
That being said there is no need to invade Pakistan, just have your troops stray into Pakistani territory whenever you need to without asking permission. They would be looking for him in the mountainous area anyways.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
08-01-2007, 07:15 PM | #6 | |
Apocalyptic Poster
Posts: 2,652
|
Quote:
1) nothing wrong with talking to those countries. It is just talk. 2) If Al queda is found to have training camps and bases in Pakinstan and that government won't do anything about it then I think we should be willing to go in and destroy their camps with or without their permission. It makes a ton more sense then what we've been doing in Iraq. Obama would do all he could to avoid that from happening diplomatically(unlike Bush) first but in the end it should be an option. Obama is a smart man. |
|
|
08-01-2007, 07:51 PM | #7 |
Ownz
Location: Virginia
Posts: 778
|
He's got balls, I like his balls.
But talking to our enemies. Wow dudehitscar you would talk to North Korea but you want talk to me? |
|
08-01-2007, 08:01 PM | #8 | ||
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
08-01-2007, 09:05 PM | #9 |
Demi-God
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 335
|
I think I'd rather have the Bush administration stick around before putting Hillary and/or Obama in the White House.
How silly we were to have faith in anything. |
|
08-01-2007, 10:07 PM | #10 |
Apocalyptic Poster
Location: THIS IS IT!
Posts: 2,921
|
"who will talk to our enemies no questions asked"
i like how the media has played telephone with what obama said in the debate and made him into some half-wit who would be used by hostile leaders. this country has so many people willing to let an australian man tell them how and what to think. pathetic. |
|
08-01-2007, 10:14 PM | #11 | |
Apocalyptic Poster
Posts: 2,652
|
Quote:
Your opinion and nothing more. Your condemning Obama on a hunch instead of looking at his ideas rationally. Pretty unfair for someone so new to the scene. |
|
|
08-01-2007, 10:53 PM | #12 | |
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
As for this business about being "fair" to Obama...do you really think that I of all people am reveling in the fact that Hillary Clinton is cruising to the Democratic nomination? I wish someone would step up and give her a challenge, and Obama is the best guy to do it...but IMO he's screwing it up every time he opens his mouth and shows his inexperience and naivete. |
|
|
08-01-2007, 10:56 PM | #13 |
Demi-God
Posts: 404
|
Haha! who's the cowboy now!
Thanks Obama for reminding us all that Bush is not as much of a reckless asshole as 8 years of liberal hammering has lead us to believe. |
|
08-02-2007, 01:16 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Location: In my house.
Posts: 14,464
|
great. Now you get to pick candidates based on which countries they want to invade.
|
|
08-02-2007, 01:29 AM | #15 |
The Man of Tomorrow
Posts: 26,965
|
It might be best to know before hand.
|
|
08-02-2007, 02:06 AM | #16 | |
Apocalyptic Poster
Location: Let's hang ourselves immediately!
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
Last edited by Eric Blair : 08-02-2007 at 06:55 AM. |
|
|
08-02-2007, 02:10 AM | #17 | |
Apocalyptic Poster
Location: Let's hang ourselves immediately!
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
I predict that anyone with half a brain will not think this. |
|
|
08-02-2007, 03:01 AM | #18 | ||
Pledge
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
It is also important to note that it is to neither side's advantage to point out the obvious. The Bush Administration needs a boogeyman and the radical Islam movement needs a figurehead. Since bin Laden didn't die in a "martyr"-like fashion, it is not advantageous for jihadists to acknowledge his demise. Of course, this doesn't excuse Bush for not going after bin Laden more aggressively after 9/11. I'm just explaining why catching bin Laden isn't a valid reason for invading Pakistan now. Quote:
Oh, and Corganist's right. Obama is way out of his league. Clinton, at the very least, has a decent grasp of foreign policy issues. |
||
|
08-02-2007, 03:44 AM | #19 | |
Demi-God
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
It's Irony with a twist of sarcasm this time. Correct me if you please Kiwi. edit: And don't try and imply that you are the authority on other people's ideas. (Future and past applies) At all times you are a douche. Obama's willingness to invade Pakistan means that the alternative to the evil chimp Bush may be just as bad or even worse. Consider the radical idea that it could possibly be true. Fuck off EricBLAIR! (Douchebag) Last edited by candycane : 08-02-2007 at 04:08 AM. |
|
|
08-02-2007, 04:43 AM | #20 | |
Apocalyptic Poster
Location: makin movies, makin songs and fightin 'round the world
Posts: 1,430
|
Quote:
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 06:41 AM | #21 |
Quaid Hates You
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 14,155
|
He's just watched too much 24, give him a break.
|
|
08-02-2007, 10:02 AM | #22 | |
Ownz
Location: Virginia
Posts: 778
|
Quote:
Clinton could have killed Bin on more than one occasion but he made the choice not to. I applaud Obama wanting to kill terrorist. But he doesn’t want to kill them in Iraq? The war in Iraq is going well. It is going to cause a land slide defeat for the democrats. They are going to be put in the position of explaining that they were wrong. Last edited by Cup O Mercury : 08-02-2007 at 10:11 AM. |
|
|
08-02-2007, 10:19 AM | #23 |
Ownz
Location: Virginia
Posts: 778
|
I am under the impression that we are kicking ass in Iraq.
Which one of you will flip flop first?! |
|
08-02-2007, 11:50 AM | #24 |
Apocalyptic Poster
Location: quit netphor til nov 5, 2007.
Posts: 4,360
|
obama will say anything to seem like the right balance
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:56 PM | #25 | |
Pledge
Location: Honduras
Posts: 241
|
Quote:
|
|
|
08-03-2007, 07:06 AM | #26 |
*****
Posts: 15,731
|
lol maybe Obama should tell Bush to take a look in Pakistan.
he's certainly screwed himself now! Never .......never.......talk about invading countries when running for president. Or is that too old school? |
|
08-03-2007, 07:09 AM | #27 | |
*****
Posts: 15,731
|
Quote:
|
|
|
08-03-2007, 07:11 AM | #28 | |
*****
Posts: 15,731
|
Quote:
|
|
|
08-03-2007, 08:44 AM | #29 | |
Ownz
Location: Virginia
Posts: 778
|
Quote:
|
|
|
08-03-2007, 11:32 AM | #30 |
Registered User
Location: In my house.
Posts: 14,464
|
I see a lot of anti-war types voting for Obama. That really blows my mind. The man is just as pro-war as all of them.
|
|