|
|
Register | Netphoria's Amazon.com Link | Members List |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-23-2006, 04:17 AM | #1 |
*****
Posts: 15,731
|
U.S. Plans Test of Military Draft
By JOHN HENDREN
Dec. 22, 2006 —*The Selective Service plans to test its operational system in case the United States again opts to draft young American men into military service — a test laden with meaning as the Bush administration considers increasing the size of the military and a surge of new troops in Iraq. Preparations for the new test, slated for 2009, will begin in June. But Selective Service officials, who have been overwhelmed with telephone inquiries over the news, are quick to say that this test is merely a routine exercise. "The whole thing's a tempest in a teapot," agency spokesman Dick Flahavan said. "We're not getting ready to spring a draft." The Bush administration has opposed a draft, with former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld saying the current all-volunteer force is adequate and more effective. But the prospect of a draft has been increasingly controversial as the three-year-old war in Iraq grows progressively more unpopular with the American public. Veterans Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson on Thursday told reporters that "society would benefit" under a renewed draft, though he later said he did not support bringing it back. Democrats opposed to the Iraq war have used the threat of a new draft to draw Americans' attention to the stakes of the conflict. Incoming Ways and Means Committee Chair Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., said last month that he plans to reintroduce legislation in the 110th Congress to reinstate the draft. A Troop Surge The test was announced as President Bush appears likely to declare a surge of 30,000 or more new Americans troops to join the current 140,000 soldiers on the ground in Iraq to curb rising violence. Bush told The Washington Post that he is also favorably inclined toward increasing the size of the Army and Marines. The services have recently lowered standards for many of the 1.4 million-strong service members now in uniform in order to maintain current recruiting levels. Rangel has offered — and voted against — the measure in the past. In October 2004, a month away from a tight presidential race fueled by rumors of a new draft, the Republican-led Congress overwhelming defeated Rangel's bill to restore conscription, 402-2. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., and Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., were the only members of Congress to vote in its favor. Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has said the proposal is not high on the congressional priority list come January, but she commended Rangel's commitment to the cause last month. "It's not about a draft; it's about shared sacrifice in our country," Pelosi told reporters in her office. But when asked directly if she supported a measure to reinstate the draft, "No, no," was Pelosi's answer. The test is a dry run of the machinery that randomly selects men who are legally obligated to sign up at 18 and the bureaucracy that considers conscientious objectors and appeals for delays based on hardship. History of the Test The agency has run through tests periodically since mandatory draft registration was reinstituted in 1980 for the first time since the Vietnam War. But it hasn't tested the system since 1998 due to funding shortages, Flahavan said. The organization's budget has slipped from about $28 million in the 1980s to $24 million in 2006. So the test, last planned for 2005, has also been delayed, Flahavan said. "The year 2009 seemed like the closest time we could do it given resources and manpower," Flahavan said. "It may not even happen then depending on what we look like in 2008." The agency has a full-time staff of 150 but would need 6,000 to carry out a draft. Another 11,000 part-time officials in 2,000 local draft boards and state headquarters have been designated, but only do annual training in case of a draft, agency officials said. "My title's bigger than my staff," quips Flahavan, associate director for public affairs. "Most of our structure doesn't exist during peacetime because there is no draft." Source Last edited by Starla : 12-23-2006 at 04:43 AM. |
|
12-23-2006, 04:57 AM | #2 |
Banned
Location: I believe in the transcendental qualities of friendship.
Posts: 39,439
|
HERE WE GO AGAIN
|
|
12-23-2006, 05:22 AM | #3 |
*****
Posts: 15,731
|
Iraq will be like a trip to douche mountain!
|
|
12-23-2006, 05:59 AM | #4 |
THIS IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!
Location: || MY NAME IS KIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIID ROCK!!
Posts: 47,247
|
im not really keen on the idea of murdering people
|
|
12-23-2006, 09:12 AM | #5 |
Master of Karate and Friendship
Location: in your butt
Posts: 72,975
|
The draft could be the best thing that ever happened to the laziest generation in history
|
|
12-23-2006, 11:48 AM | #6 |
Apocalyptic Poster
Location: Woodinville, Wa.
Posts: 3,281
|
Good thing i'll be 26 next april. good luck with this though.
|
|
12-23-2006, 01:04 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Posts: 5,018
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 01:14 PM | #8 |
Minion of Satan
Posts: 6,212
|
Oh, cool, I'll be graduating college in 2009. I won't have anything stopping me from a ticket to Iraq! Sweet!
|
|
12-23-2006, 02:24 PM | #9 |
has great self of steam.
Location: SECRET OBAMA FUCKDEN RENDEZVOUS
Posts: 24,305
|
Read the article... they last tested it in 1998, they test it regularly, but haven't been able to up until this point because they didn't have the money. And they're not testing it again until 2009.
This is not news. This is the media blowing something up that isn't worth hearing about. |
|
12-23-2006, 03:25 PM | #10 | |
OB-GYN Kenobi
Location: the sea
Posts: 17,020
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 03:40 PM | #11 |
ADMlNISTRATOR
Posts: 18,932
|
how old do you have to be for eligibility?
|
|
12-23-2006, 03:41 PM | #12 | |
Minion of Satan
Posts: 6,212
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 03:46 PM | #13 |
ADMlNISTRATOR
Posts: 18,932
|
nimrod's an exception to the rule
|
|
12-23-2006, 03:50 PM | #14 |
ADMlNISTRATOR
Posts: 18,932
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 04:06 PM | #15 |
Banned
Location: stay, far, away
Posts: 8,986
|
Military forces have lowered their standards to meet recruiting goals recently (that's worth looking into if you got the time)...so the numbers are there currently to sustain a volunteer force.
im kinda laughing at the irony how Rumsfeld was the biggest opponent to a draft and had a vision of the military of the future to be lean and swift with high technology... With all the hate he got from dumbass college kids like those from socialist clubs from Columbia Univ., they should watch what they wish for...hah. overall though, JokeyLoki is right about this at the moment. . |
|
12-23-2006, 04:12 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Posts: 5,018
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 07:17 PM | #17 |
NO FATS
Location: NO FEMS
Posts: 29,003
|
I like dick, does this apply to me.
|
|
12-23-2006, 07:56 PM | #18 | |
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 07:58 PM | #19 |
Minion of Satan
Posts: 6,212
|
Do you people equate "laziness" with "protesters" or something?
|
|
12-23-2006, 09:10 PM | #20 | |
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 09:21 PM | #21 | |
CORNFROST
Location: GUREITO DESU YO
Posts: 24,888
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-23-2006, 10:10 PM | #22 | |
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
Then again, maybe Nimrod meant "lazy" in the political sense...in which case I guess his point would make some sense. |
|
|
12-23-2006, 11:12 PM | #23 |
*****
Posts: 15,731
|
Why must being an objector to war be equated with laziness?
Slapping a gun in a kid's hand and sending them off to kill people is helping them "get a real life" or something to do? It seems that the people who crow loudest about how people need to be patriots and die in some senseless war, are the same ones who sit back on their asses and do nothing at all. |
|
12-23-2006, 11:48 PM | #24 | |
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
The point being discussed in reference to Nimrod's comment, to my understanding, is whether or not a draft would shape up lazy people into productive citizens or not. It has nothing at all to do with how good or bad you think the war or the military is. |
|
|
12-24-2006, 12:27 AM | #25 | |
CORNFROST
Location: GUREITO DESU YO
Posts: 24,888
|
Quote:
As for whether the military would actually do that, I had this debate with someone I used to work with - he was an ex-army guy, served in northern ireland and all that, and he said that a couple of years mandatory service would work wonders and it should be put into place. I basically said that it probably would help a lot of people, but it would probably destroy a lot of others - one person might gain discipline and confidence whereas another could be reduced to a shell, so it should be up to the individual to choose. I'm not so sure how much it would help when it even worked though, since I've seen enough slack-jawed ex-military types. Plus there's the whole thing about people coming back from war and being unable to actually reintegrate themselves into society, unable to make the switch back to civilian life |
|
|
12-24-2006, 01:51 AM | #26 | ||
Minion of Satan
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
Quote:
But be all that as it may, its obviously not for all people. Its probably not even for most people. And I surely don't think that forcing people into it is an option that would be good for anybody. For every draftee that ends up wanting to make a career out of his enlistment, there'll be a handful more who hate it and will want nothing more than to serve their time and get out. And the latter are not exactly the type of people you want to fill up a top notch fighting force with. I'm not sure fucking with the effectiveness of the armed forces is worth a few more warm bodies in the barracks and the empty hope that some civil service will build character. |
||
|
12-24-2006, 02:52 AM | #27 |
Immortal
Posts: 25,684
|
OOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHH CAAAAAAAAAAAAANAAAAADAAAAAAAAAAAA
|
|
12-24-2006, 02:53 AM | #28 |
Immortal
Posts: 25,684
|
|
|
12-24-2006, 02:54 AM | #29 |
Immortal
Posts: 25,684
|
|
|
12-24-2006, 07:17 PM | #30 | ||
CORNFROST
Location: GUREITO DESU YO
Posts: 24,888
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|