|
12-28-2014, 09:10 PM | #151 | |||||||||||||||||
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
12-28-2014, 09:12 PM | #152 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
so they don't give a fuck because the first minute of this song isn't structured four-chord pop music?
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:12 PM | #153 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
ooooooh outside the square right here, Gallaghers.
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:13 PM | #154 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
OOOOOOH TURN IT UP LOUD BOYS!!
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:14 PM | #155 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
Definitely Maybe isn't the worst album in the world. But seriously if you think this band "turned up guitars and banged drums", i'd hasten to say that your musical experience is somewhat limited.
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:14 PM | #156 |
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
i wasn't equating not-giving-a-fuck with making avant garde art-jazz or whatever the hell it is you're getting at
i didn't say they were extremely removed from the "songwriting box" either it's just that their whole approach to the thing was pretty much, from gallagher's mouth, "snorting coke and hitting record," not some laborious radio-minded process and hearing all their albums, that's just something i did for bands i got into at 14 |
|
12-28-2014, 09:15 PM | #157 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:15 PM | #158 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
you mentioned "avant garde art jazz", not me.
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:16 PM | #159 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
but i guess, you are an authority....
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:18 PM | #160 |
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
they have, mostly because their favorite music was, honestly
if L & N had grown up on ornette coleman or something it would have been loud saxophones & tom-heavy percussion, they just happened to really like their set of Beatles, Stones, & Kinks' best-ofs their "not giving a fuck" attitude was more about the kind of booksmart attitude they felt was bein projected by Radiohead & co, a bitter middle-class rebellion thing than any resistance toward actually being played & listened to. if that was the case they would have broken up after album 1, if not sooner |
|
12-28-2014, 09:21 PM | #161 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:21 PM | #162 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
if i grew up in an African-American household, chances are i'd listen to nothing but hip hop. what's your fucking point man?
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:22 PM | #163 | |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
Quote:
|
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:27 PM | #164 |
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
because you started making it seem more like a debate about their actual song structures or something, i was just stating what i thought was the obvious - they were just playing noel's songs through turned-up guitars and pounding drums
maybe the drum part subsided a little after Definitely Maybe, since they changed drummers in that instance. maybe "pounding" isn't the best word, but still. there's something reckless about that part of the band at times particularly on stuff like "Fade Away." when i've heard practically all of their album material? i think i'm an authority to make objective statements on how they sound, yes |
|
12-28-2014, 09:30 PM | #165 | ||
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
Quote:
Quote:
i don't even know how you could get that third thing from what i'd said, though |
||
|
12-28-2014, 09:31 PM | #166 | ||
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
12-28-2014, 09:33 PM | #167 | |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
Quote:
their popularity comes from the fact that casual music fans can sing along to their songs at parties, much like a Bon Jovi or a Bryan Adams. |
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:35 PM | #168 |
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
the comment about hearing all of their albums wasn't a boast, i was just pointing out where i was coming from on that. and honestly, didn't think anyone who'd heard stuff outside of the radio singles/acoustic songs would disagree that oasis were loud.
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:35 PM | #169 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
"all my people, right here, right now. do you know what i mean? yeah, yeah"
- Bono |
|
12-28-2014, 09:41 PM | #170 |
Ownz
Location: london, uk
Posts: 546
|
Never loved Oasis (too much of a disappointed/impatient Stone Roses fan for that) but wound up seeing them a few times. When Liam was into it he was utterly captivating, when he wasn’t it was murder. It took Noel going solo to appreciate that he has zero stage presence and charisma without Liam, no matter how dry and hilarious he is in interviews. Couldn’t give less of a fuck about whether they reform but do sincerely wish they’d written more songs like this –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I3CwSXhd40 |
|
12-28-2014, 09:41 PM | #171 |
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
they've never made a secret of wanting to be the biggest band in the world, or feeling like they were the best
but in terms of what they didn't give a fuck about? people thinking they weren't intricate or arty enough, basically, wasn't fabricated. how they were wasn't an act |
|
12-28-2014, 09:44 PM | #172 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:53 PM | #173 |
Virgo
Posts: 42,781
|
where were u whil we were gettin high
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:54 PM | #174 |
Socialphobic
Location: Your god damn living room
Posts: 10,000
|
that wasn't what the attitude was ever directed to, though
it was at bands who actually went out of their way to state that they didn't want "huge followings" i was disagreeing about the band's approach & their alleged "overproduced tripe," when i feel like - until they actually became big maybe - they were about as straightforward as it gets. what they said is what they did |
|
12-28-2014, 09:55 PM | #175 |
Virgo
Posts: 42,781
|
|
|
12-28-2014, 09:58 PM | #176 |
Ownz
Location: london, uk
Posts: 546
|
Of course. Always. Especially Noel. He was a working class roadie nearing 30 when Creation signed them and the chance wasn't going to come again. There's a hilarious bit in the book about Creation when, in one of their first meetings, Noel says how much he loves U2 and Alan MacGee is appalled and changes the subject to Big Star. Noel duly affects much enthusiasm for all things Alex Chilton but later conceded he'd never heard of them. Being on the same label as the Mary Chain, Ride, Primal Scream & MBV gave Oasis a crucial launchpad as an indie band (at least in UK) and it obscured who and what they really were and then they were massive and it didn't matter...
|
|
12-29-2014, 12:18 AM | #177 | |
Banned
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 6,310
|
Quote:
Oasis being somewhat influenced by the Rolling Stones did make them different from most of their Britpop peers. |
|
|
12-29-2014, 01:11 AM | #178 |
Ownz
Location: london, uk
Posts: 546
|
The only Britpop era album that bears a big Stones influence is Primal Scream's Give Out Don't Give Up...to the point of parody in fact.
|
|
12-29-2014, 02:20 AM | #179 |
Banned
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 6,310
|
So Coldplay and Oasis do have something in common. They were never cool bands within the Britpop scene. Both always looked down upon by indie rock fans and hipsters.
|
|
12-29-2014, 02:23 AM | #180 |
Banned
Location: so 1994 I could die
Posts: 15,964
|
and they're both godawful
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
post punk revival tiers | Catherine Wheel | Music Board Archive | 337 | 12-31-2014 10:52 PM |
Jesus, UK albums charts wernen't THIS indie in the '95 Britpop heyday! | mojo | Music Board Archive | 4 | 01-30-2006 11:10 AM |