New Weezer Album By Mid 2008?

D. · 09-28-2007, 05:37 AM

is this old?

http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/blog...ntality/?p=202

The Gaddrow · 09-28-2007, 08:19 AM

It's really hard to care about them anymore.

jenga66 · 09-28-2007, 09:59 AM

I gave up on Weezer after Pinkerton. That sounds a bit hipster-ish of me, but it's hard to like shitty pop songs about Beverly Hills.

MrPantyFAce · 09-28-2007, 01:04 PM

you guys are just jealous that you dont what its like to wear sweaters and thick rim glasses.

theFoulLasagna · 09-28-2007, 01:45 PM

if beverly hills is the only song you listened to on make believe, then you missed out. there are several quality songs on there.

Rockin' Cherub · 09-28-2007, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *************

even if it won't be top notch weezer, it will still be better than 95% of everything else on the radio these days. cheer up, laddies.

how does that make it good?

also i disagree

Corganist · 09-28-2007, 04:37 PM

I actually enjoy the post-Pinkerton Weezer albums more than most people, but I'm still kinda wary of this one. Make Believe was really hit or miss even compared with Green and Maladroit. I'll definitely check the new one out though.

I suppose it's too much to hope that one day Rivers shows a glimpse of the brilliance that was on display on Blue and Pinkerton. I love those two albums almost as much as MCIS and SD.

D. · 09-28-2007, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *************

will still be better than 95% of everything else on the radio these days. cheer up, laddies.

this is quickly becoming the biggest cop out in music discussion.

Fellatio Mask! · 09-28-2007, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corganist

I actually enjoy ***something that sucks*** more than most people

well no shit

Boycott Graceland · 09-28-2007, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corganist

I suppose it's too much to hope that one day Rivers shows a glimpse of the brilliance that was on display on Blue and Pinkerton.

that "glimpse of brilliance" was the fact that he used to not be so egomaniacal that he could collaborate with other people in the creative process

don't you notice weird and gross similarities between weezer2k and SP2?

sppunk · 09-28-2007, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boycott Graceland

that "glimpse of brilliance" was the fact that he used to not be so egomaniacal that he could collaborate with other people in the creative process

don't you notice weird and gross similarities between weezer2k and SP2?

No, that "glimpse of brilliance" was named Matt Sharp.

Fellatio Mask! · 09-28-2007, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sppunk

No, that "glimpse of brilliance" was named Matt Sharp.

yes...he was collaborating with matt sharp and since then has been working on the songs himself

you see what boycott is saying now?
you follow this?

sppunk · 09-28-2007, 09:04 PM

I, for one, believe Matt Sharp was the sole writer of most all of Pinkerton, weezer's best work to date.

Revenant · 09-29-2007, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sppunk

I, for one, believe Matt Sharp was the sole writer of most all of Pinkerton, weezer's best work to date.

Matt Sharps contributions to Weezer were as follows and limited to. Playing a very mediocre bass, making really lame oohs and ahs on record and making dumb faces in front of the camera. You have to be seriously retarded if you think Sharp was the brains behind Pinkerton. Sure you could make an argument about post Sharp Weezer but then somebody will just mention how the Rentals suck balls and solo Sharp sucks even harder.

The Shit · 09-29-2007, 08:27 PM

i used to like pinkerton but then i grew up

redbreegull · 09-30-2007, 12:07 AM

Weezer's music is still better than average, ranging from above mediocre to decently good.

But of course on netphoria it's "unlistenable garbage".

Revenant · 09-30-2007, 12:32 AM

I actually enjoy the Green album, Maladroit has a few good songs Slave being my favorite. Make Believe also has some good tunes. I just think alot of the songs they scrapped for album five like Private Message, Mansion of Cardboard etc were way better than what we got.

redbull · 09-30-2007, 12:36 AM

OMG GUYS IM GOING TO SEE PEARL JAM

redbreegull · 09-30-2007, 01:35 AM

I mean, obviously Beverly Hills is a fucking stupid song, but it's still better than most of the shit you are likely to be exposed to on a daily basis.

redbull · 09-30-2007, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbreegull

it's still better than most of the shit you are likely to be exposed to on a daily basis.

can we ban this argument from the music board, seriously. its like trying to rationalize zeitgeist

redbreegull · 09-30-2007, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbull

can we ban this argument from the music board, seriously. its like trying to rationalize zeitgeist

We can ban it when Netphoria stops being a hub of Pitchfork reading pompous cunts, in other words never.

redbull · 09-30-2007, 02:14 AM

i don't understand why we have to like stuff because it better than most other stuff though. I mean you don't have to constantly read pitchfork in order to listen to non-mainstream shit

D. · 09-30-2007, 02:22 AM

yeah, i move to ban that phrase, too. i motioned for it in another thread where some idiot said something was "better than most the crap on the radio".

wtf kind of argument is that? shit with perfume on it is still shit.

redbull · 09-30-2007, 02:39 AM

god, only in dreams is so good

Mouths of Babes · 09-30-2007, 03:39 AM

Ugh, Pitchfork. If you go there to get a list of new albums that all your "indie" peers are listening to, fine - but their reviews are unbearable these days.

D. · 09-30-2007, 04:02 AM

i love how, whenever someone doesn't like something, they are automatically pitchfork readers.

i fucking read blender, for chrissakes, i can count on one hand how many times ive actually been to pfork.com

talk show host · 09-30-2007, 08:06 AM

This thread, if nothing else, shows that both of the following arguments are retarded and should be banned from this board:

"*insert band here*'s music is still better than average, ranging from above mediocre to decently good." - the 'it's better then the other shit out there' argument

and

"We can ban it when Netphoria stops being a hub of Pitchfork reading pompous cunts, in other words never." - the 'all your base are belong to pitchfork' argument

And they say redbreegull doesn't make a contribution to netphoria.

I'm Hardcore · 09-30-2007, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbreegull

We can ban it when Netphoria stops being a hub of Pitchfork reading pompous cunts, in other words never.

you're such a fucking cock. Grow up.

D. · 09-30-2007, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I'm Hardcore

you're such a fucking cock. Grow up.

you just don't like redbull because pitchfork said his last album sucked.

I'm Hardcore · 09-30-2007, 08:38 AM

i have been to Pitchfork TWICE in my entire life. no shit.

i get my fix from allmusic.com. I dont download music because some reviewer says that its good; i download stuff similar to other stuff that i like.

09-28-2007, 05:37 AM	#1
D. Consume my pants. Location: Missouri Posts: 36,099	New Weezer Album By Mid 2008? is this old? http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/blog...ntality/?p=202

09-28-2007, 08:19 AM	#2
The Gaddrow Minion of Satan Location: Nowhere Posts: 7,049	It's really hard to care about them anymore.

09-28-2007, 09:59 AM	#3
jenga66 Demi-God Posts: 352	I gave up on Weezer after Pinkerton. That sounds a bit hipster-ish of me, but it's hard to like shitty pop songs about Beverly Hills.

09-28-2007, 01:04 PM	#4
MrPantyFAce Apocalyptic Poster Posts: 1,781	you guys are just jealous that you dont what its like to wear sweaters and thick rim glasses.

09-28-2007, 01:45 PM	#5
theFoulLasagna Demi-God Location: smell the glove Posts: 360	if beverly hills is the only song you listened to on make believe, then you missed out. there are several quality songs on there.

09-28-2007, 04:37 PM	#7
Corganist Minion of Satan Location: Arkansas Posts: 7,240	I actually enjoy the post-Pinkerton Weezer albums more than most people, but I'm still kinda wary of this one. Make Believe was really hit or miss even compared with Green and Maladroit. I'll definitely check the new one out though. I suppose it's too much to hope that one day Rivers shows a glimpse of the brilliance that was on display on Blue and Pinkerton. I love those two albums almost as much as MCIS and SD.

09-28-2007, 09:04 PM	#13
sppunk Netphoria's George Will Location: Fenway Park Posts: 37,109	I, for one, believe Matt Sharp was the sole writer of most all of Pinkerton, weezer's best work to date.

09-29-2007, 08:27 PM	#15
The Shit Demi-God Posts: 254	i used to like pinkerton but then i grew up

09-30-2007, 12:07 AM	#16
redbreegull Just Hook it to My Veins! Location: N3t4Euh Haus Posts: 32,753	Weezer's music is still better than average, ranging from above mediocre to decently good. But of course on netphoria it's "unlistenable garbage".

09-30-2007, 12:32 AM	#17
Revenant Pledge Location: St.Paul Mn Posts: 157	I actually enjoy the Green album, Maladroit has a few good songs Slave being my favorite. Make Believe also has some good tunes. I just think alot of the songs they scrapped for album five like Private Message, Mansion of Cardboard etc were way better than what we got.

09-30-2007, 12:36 AM	#18
redbull Immortal Location: like liutenant dan i'm rollin' Posts: 21,016	OMG GUYS IM GOING TO SEE PEARL JAM

09-30-2007, 01:35 AM	#19
redbreegull Just Hook it to My Veins! Location: N3t4Euh Haus Posts: 32,753	I mean, obviously Beverly Hills is a fucking stupid song, but it's still better than most of the shit you are likely to be exposed to on a daily basis.

09-30-2007, 02:14 AM	#22
redbull Immortal Location: like liutenant dan i'm rollin' Posts: 21,016	i don't understand why we have to like stuff because it better than most other stuff though. I mean you don't have to constantly read pitchfork in order to listen to non-mainstream shit

09-30-2007, 02:22 AM	#23
D. Consume my pants. Location: Missouri Posts: 36,099	yeah, i move to ban that phrase, too. i motioned for it in another thread where some idiot said something was "better than most the crap on the radio". wtf kind of argument is that? shit with perfume on it is still shit.

09-30-2007, 02:39 AM	#24
redbull Immortal Location: like liutenant dan i'm rollin' Posts: 21,016	god, only in dreams is so good

09-30-2007, 03:39 AM	#25
Mouths of Babes Ownz Posts: 506	Ugh, Pitchfork. If you go there to get a list of new albums that all your "indie" peers are listening to, fine - but their reviews are unbearable these days.

09-30-2007, 04:02 AM	#26
D. Consume my pants. Location: Missouri Posts: 36,099	i love how, whenever someone doesn't like something, they are automatically pitchfork readers. i fucking read blender, for chrissakes, i can count on one hand how many times ive actually been to pfork.com

09-30-2007, 08:06 AM	#27
talk show host Apocalyptic Poster Location: I thought using a condom was assumed but like, even if you didn't use one how would putting a vegetable in your pussy cause some sort of infection? Like, you can fucking EAT IT, but you can't put it in your fucking vagina and move it around a little Posts: 2,790	This thread, if nothing else, shows that both of the following arguments are retarded and should be banned from this board: "insert band here's music is still better than average, ranging from above mediocre to decently good." - the 'it's better then the other shit out there' argument and "We can ban it when Netphoria stops being a hub of Pitchfork reading pompous cunts, in other words never." - the 'all your base are belong to pitchfork' argument And they say redbreegull doesn't make a contribution to netphoria.

09-30-2007, 08:38 AM	#30
I'm Hardcore Banned Location: so 1994 I could die Posts: 15,964	i have been to Pitchfork TWICE in my entire life. no shit. i get my fix from allmusic.com. I dont download music because some reviewer says that its good; i download stuff similar to other stuff that i like.