you know how when you are looking at amatuer porn you are always secretly hoping...

[Trotskilicious]

So not only did he not share consent he didn't even ask permission? And that's cool.

By the way you can't demonstrate that these pics weren't sent to a guy she was obsessed with and didn't want the pics, so you're layering a lot of qualifications on it.

But at the end we agree that sharing noods of men and women without consent is wrong, lets not get hysterical. I just wish you'd stop excusing your hypocrisy for laughing at farve but still being high and mighty mr. feminist liberal man, nahmean? Sets people off from the cause, nahmean? Creates divisions, nahmean?

[redbreegull]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

don't selectively quote me, redbreegull. you fucking shithead.

I've never looked at a specific girl's profile on a site like that, nor have I ever watched a public cam show. We are talking about home shot couple sex, which as I already stated, is totally pervasive on sites like that. And no, you are not correct that it is always easy to tell which were meant to be private. Many videos that were not meant to be shared have been sold to legitimate porn websites which watermark them and put their own intro and logo on them, and some home shot stuff gets posted totally raw by sexually adventurous couples.

[Eulogy]

but hey, trots.

if you're gonna side with rbg here, i'll be comfortable in my dissent. have fun.

[redbreegull]

he's not even siding with me, what is wrong with your head boy

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by redbreegull

I've never looked at a specific girl's profile on a site like that, nor have I ever watched a public cam show. We are talking about home shot couple sex, which as I already stated, is totally pervasive on sites like that. And no, you are not correct that it is always easy to tell which were meant to be private. Many videos that were not meant to be shared have been sold to legitimate porn websites which watermark them and put their own intro and logo on them, and some home shot stuff gets posted totally raw by sexually adventurous couples.

it's easy enough. go fuck yourself. enjoy exploiting innocent women just so you can get your rocks off. you're a shithead who's morals disappear when you get a boner.

[redbreegull]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

it's easy enough. go fuck yourself. enjoy exploiting innocent women just so you can get your rocks off. you're a shithead who's morals disappear when you get a boner.

how would you know since you don't look at porn with women

[redbreegull]

I mean, you can say it as many times as you want, but you are WRONG. You might want things to be that simple, but that doesn't make it fact.

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

but hey, trots.

if you're gonna side with rbg here, i'll be comfortable in my dissent. have fun.

i just want you to be consistent if you're going to be so pretentious

besides, i haven't even really read anything rbg posted because i already made it pretty clear that if he passes the pics on he's pretty shitty.

[redbreegull]

"it's easy enough"

you sound like a crazy person. You will regret your performance in this thread tomorrow.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

So not only did he not share consent he didn't even ask permission? And that's cool.

By the way you can't demonstrate that these pics weren't sent to a guy she was obsessed with and didn't want the pics, so you're layering a lot of qualifications on it.

But at the end we agree that sharing noods of men and women without consent is wrong, lets not get hysterical. I just wish you'd stop excusing your hypocrisy for laughing at farve but still being high and mighty mr. feminist liberal man, nahmean? Sets people off from the cause, nahmean? Creates divisions, nahmean?

no i do know what you mean. sorry i started to conflate you with rbg. i shouldn't have done that.

but it's well settled that those pictures were unsolicited, right? if not, then i'll retract.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by redbreegull

"it's easy enough"

you sound like a crazy person. You will regret your performance in this thread tomorrow.

no.

you are a fucking hypocritical prick.

remember when you conceded the moral high ground a couple pages ago?

yeah that still counts. i'm just not giving you a pass for it, you fucking shithead.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by redbreegull

how would you know since you don't look at porn with women

yeah because only women get exploited in porn

jesus christ you are so fucking stupid

[Elvis The Fat Years]

caine walker post eulogy nudes.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by redbreegull

I already acknowledged it is morally hypocritical, and I already acknowledged you have the moral high ground.

here it is

if anyone was curious

i'm just telling you to stop giving in to your misogynistic instincts.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Elvis The Fat Years

caine walker post eulogy nudes.

he won't do it because he's not an asshole

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

it's easy enough. go fuck yourself. enjoy exploiting innocent women just so you can get your rocks off. you're a shithead who's morals disappear when you get a boner.

he is pretty right about this

by the way, i read this earlier found it fascinating. relates to this.

she began calling out pornographic myths — like that all women enjoy being on the receiving end of the adult industry’s celebrated “money shot.” “There’s an entire generation growing up that believes what you see in hardcore pornography is the way that you have sex,” she said, adding that this miseducation is only exacerbated by our “puritanical double-standards culture where people believe that a teen abstinence campaign will actually work, where parents are too embarrassed to have conversations about sex with their children and where educational institutions are terrified of being politically incorrect if they pick up those conversations.”

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/is_p...ves/singleton/

[redbreegull]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

no.

you are a fucking hypocritical prick.

remember when you conceded the moral high ground a couple pages ago?

yeah that still counts. i'm just not giving you a pass for it, you fucking shithead.

maybe you should give me a morality ticket, mr. morality police man

Originally Posted by Eulogy

yeah because only women get exploited in porn

jesus christ you are so fucking stupid

speaking of hypocrisy

[Eulogy]

redbreegull: it's morally hypocritical, but it's ok because i have a boner.

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

n
but it's well settled that those pictures were unsolicited, right? if not, then i'll retract.

well it is for him but we can't really prove that they were sent unsolicited on her part, odds are they weren't since i don't think straight men ever really object to nude pictures of beautiful goils, but either way releasing them is kind of shitty even if they weren't solicited. Even in Farve's case. Now if they were released as part of a sexual harassment lawsuit then that's his bad for sure and he deserves it.

Because remember this girl was sexually exploited by Deadspin (I dunno if you know this but they frequently posted pictures of her at FSU games without her consent and she liked and encouraged that) and then turned them around and scratched their back by sending them pics of Brett Farve's dick. I mean, feminism is kind of a weird thing to jam in here. That FSU chick is no feminist.

[redbreegull]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

he is pretty right about this

how so? Like I already pointed out, there are many videos which look like they are not meant to be shared which have been watermarked and distributed by pornographic businesses. Some of these are "faked," and some aren't. It's absurd to presume that you can absolutely tell the difference when so much produced porn aims to look home made and taboo, and so much home made private stuff gets mixed in with the professional stuff.

[Trotskilicious]

dude read the salon article and tell me it's not you

[Gossamer]

read most of the thread and all I can say is that I can't believe caine walker puts up with this shit...

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

well it is for him but we can't really prove that they were sent unsolicited on her part, odds are they weren't since i don't think straight men ever really object to nude pictures of beautiful goils, but either way releasing them is kind of shitty even if they weren't solicited. Even in Farve's case. Now if they were released as part of a sexual harassment lawsuit then that's his bad for sure and he deserves it.

Because remember this girl was sexually exploited by Deadspin (I dunno if you know this but they frequently posted pictures of her at FSU games without her consent and she liked and encouraged that) and then turned them around and scratched their back by sending them pics of Brett Farve's dick. I mean, feminism is kind of a weird thing to jam in here. That FSU chick is no feminist.

wait, i'm confused here.

i thought we were talking about the jets trainer who favre set unsolicited dick pics to. where does an FSU girl come into the picture?

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by redbreegull

how so? Like I already pointed out, there are many videos which look like they are not meant to be shared which have been watermarked and distributed by pornographic businesses. Some of these are "faked," and some aren't. It's absurd to presume that you can absolutely tell the difference when so much produced porn aims to look home made and taboo, and so much home made private stuff gets mixed in with the professional stuff.

this thread was about pictures that you knew were meant to be private

[Trotskilicious]

by the way, i had a dumb and possibly controversial thought, isn't heterosexuality intrinsically sexist and people with a truly equal-genders world view would be bisexual?

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by redbreegull
I already acknowledged it is morally hypocritical, and I already acknowledged you have the moral high ground.

[Eulogy]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

by the way, i had a dumb and possibly controversial thought, isn't heterosexuality intrinsically sexist and people with a truly equal-genders world view would be bisexual?

no, i don't think so. men and women heterosexuals can be equal partners. but jerking off to exploited women is sexist.

[Trotskilicious]

Originally Posted by Eulogy

wait, i'm confused here.

i thought we were talking about the jets trainer who favre set unsolicited dick pics to. where does an FSU girl come into the picture?

http://www.google.com/search?pq=bret...og&sa=N&tab=wi



you didn't know?

i saw pics of her on Deadspin and fake tit boards for a while before she even knew brett favre

[Trotskilicious]

and before you straw man this have some faith in me, i'm not saying she asked for his dick pics by dressing that way or posing for pics on the internet i just don't see it as an feminist exploitation issue

because she is presumably an opprotunist and brett favre pretty much played right into it.

[redbreegull]

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

dude read the salon article and tell me it's not you

trots I will read the whole thing if you still think I should, but after reading the first few paragraphs I don't know how this applies to me. Making the girl come is THE best part of sex to me. I would rather give oral sex than receive it, and I love a good blowjob. I never watch porn with cumshots, throat fucking, smacking women, etc. I rarely watch anything other than regular old fashioned boy on girl, and I don't want it to look like they are faking being into it for a few thousand dollars because those things are turn offs. Having said this, I will read the article if it has something else in there relevant to me, I just don't have time to do the whole thing right now.