Netphoria Message Board


Go Back   Netphoria Message Board > Archives > General Chat Archive
Register Netphoria's Amazon.com Link Members List

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2004, 05:45 PM   #1
Nimrod
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
 
Nimrod's Avatar
 
Location: the cross i'm bearing home 'aint indicative of my place
Posts: 5,410
Red face Clinton Portis for Champ Bailey?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...len&id=1742003
Quote:
Redskins in discussions to acquire tailback

By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com

INDIANAPOLIS -- The Washington Redskins, desperate to add a running back who can make a major impact on new coach Joe Gibbs' run-oriented offense, are discussing a blockbuster trade with the Denver Broncos that would give them one of the NFL's premier young backs.



The proposed deal, which percolated at the league's annual draft combine sessions this weekend, would send Denver's Clinton Portis to the Redskins in exchange for four-time Pro Bowl cornerback Champ Bailey and possibly one of their 2004 draft picks.


Portis, 22, rushed for more than 1,500 yards in each of his first two seasons with the Broncos.


Trade talks were first reported by The Denver Post in Sunday's editions. Officials from both the Broncos and the Redskins, and agents for the two high-profile veterans, worked arduously during the weekend to bring the talks much closer to reality. One point of contention: In addition to Bailey, the Broncos are asking for Washington's second-round draft choice in April. At this point, at least, the Redskins are reluctant to part with the pick, but their hesitancy could change at any time.


"You definitely need to stay close on this one," said a source, who is intimately involved in the negotiations, late Sunday night. "There's a whole lot going on. There are a few sticking points but, if you asked me will it get done, I'd tell you, 'yeah, I think so.' "


Two player agents who represent NFL running backs that will become unrestricted free agents next month told ESPN.com that they approached the Redskins to make a pitch for their clients. Both agents assumed that, with the Redskins in need of a back to bolster the power running game Gibbs prefers, they might be able to fuel some interest in their clients.


Both were apprised by Redskins officials that the franchise was on the verge of a blockbuster deal for a premier running back. "One of their top officials basically told me that, while my guy is a good player, they had something else going at tailback and that it was huge," one of the agents said.


In his first meeting with quarterback Mark Brunell, who officially will be acquired by the Redskins via trade on March 3, when the league's trade moratorium is lifted, Gibbs told the veteran that Washington would definitely add a big-time running back before the start of summer training camp. The Gibbs-designed offense dictates a hard inside runner and has succeeded in the past with players of lesser talent than Portis possesses. The slashing Portis, though, would be a terrific fit for the Redskins, league coaches agreed here.


Should the deal be consummated -- and, despite some hurdles, several league and team sources acknowledged they expect it to happen -- it could not be officially announced until March 3 as well. Such a trade would dramatically reshape the Washington offense from what it was during the two-year tenure of former coach Steve Spurrier.


The trade would certainly permit each of the teams to fill a need.


The Broncos have been seeking a true "shut-down" cornerback for years and Bailey, just 25 years of age and regarded as one of the NFL's premier cover players, clearly fits that description. From the Washington standpoint, there are no veteran tailbacks currently on the roster who can handle the workhorse role Gibbs needs to fill.


A second-round choice in the 2002 draft, Portis took over the starting job as a rookie, ran for 1,508 yards and 15 touchdowns, and the former University of Miami star was named the league's rookie of the year. He followed up that freshman performance in 2003 by rushing for 1,591 yards and 14 touchdowns. Denver officials were initially reluctant to part with Portis but feel they can compensate for his departure.


The Broncos staff was impressed with a pair of 2003 rookies, Quentin Griffin and Ahmaad Galloway, and Denver has historically been able to plug in young runners and have immediate success with them. Plus the Broncos understand that to add a player of Bailey's stature, they must reciprocate with a big-time performer.


The proposed trade goes beyond just football needs, however, and extends out to some contractual considerations.


As a rookie, Portis signed a four-year contract that *******d a $1.29 million signing bonus but only minimum annual base salaries. His scheduled base salaries for the last two years of the deal are $380,000 in 2004 and $455,000 for 2005. At the Pro Bowl two weeks ago, Portis suggested he might boycott training camp unless his contract was upgraded and his comments did not sit well with Broncos management.


The Redskins two weeks ago determined they could not meet Bailey's contract demands and granted the five-year veteran and former first-round draft choice permission to speak with other teams about a possible trade. Since then, the Redskins have designated Bailey a "franchise" player, the equivalent of making him a one-year qualifying offer worth $6.801 million.


Obviously, for a trade to be consummated, Bailey, ostensibly a limited free agent, would have to sign a new contract. And the Redskins certainly will not acquire Portis without first addressing his contractual grievances. Agents for both players have been working with the Redskins and Broncos on new contracts for their clients.


In other Broncos news, running back Mike Anderson has reportedly requested his release after the team sugggested cutting his salary.


According to the Rocky Mountain News, Denver wants to cut Anderson's 2004 salary from $1.76 million to the veteran minimum, $535,000, plus incentives.


David Canter, Anderson's agent, told the paper that his client would prefer to become a free agent than accept a significant pay cut.


Anderson, the 2000 NFL Rookie of the Year, had five touchdowns last year, with 257 rushing yards and 53 receiving yards.


Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
Either Denver is being really stupid, or they realize that whomever they put at RB puts up fantastic numbers and that Portis is simply average.

 
Nimrod is offline
Old 02-23-2004, 05:49 PM   #2
Quagmire
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Clinton Portis for Champ Bailey?

Quote:
Originally posted by Nimrod


Either Denver is being really stupid, or they realize that whomever they put at RB puts up fantastic numbers and that Portis is simply average.
denver is dumb because they think any RB they have will rush for tons of yards. not necessarily true, they've just been lucky enough to get good rb's.

as for the skins. gee, it's not like they had a good RB a few years ago. i think his name was STEPHEN DAVIS?! Steve Spurrier is an idiot.

 
Old 02-23-2004, 05:51 PM   #3
guz
El Gringo Mexicano
 
guz's Avatar
 
Location: I'd rather just have dome anyway
Posts: 8,599
Default

i think it's the latter of the two. portis is a nice back, but i really think a lot of it has to do w/ denvers line. their 2nd/3rd string backs come in and have great games when portis is out. add to that the fact that he's starting to talk about $$, and i think this is a quality trade that would satisfy both ends. bailey is a really nice d-back, and young.

 
guz is offline
Old 02-23-2004, 05:54 PM   #4
DeviousJ
CORNFROST
 
DeviousJ's Avatar
 
Location: GUREITO DESU YO
Posts: 24,891
Talking

I know those words, but this thread title makes no sense

 
DeviousJ is offline
Old 02-24-2004, 03:26 AM   #5
I Ate My Hamster
Apocalyptic Poster
 
I Ate My Hamster's Avatar
 
Location: jersey
Posts: 3,091
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by DeviousJ
I know those words, but this thread title makes no sense

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

Brits...PFFT...

 
I Ate My Hamster is offline
Old 02-24-2004, 03:30 AM   #6
ReadMusic
Apocalyptic Poster
 
ReadMusic's Avatar
 
Location: VALLEY RANCH
Posts: 2,922
Default

I think good cornerbacks are harder to come by in the league right now than running backs.

I'd definitely keep the shutdown cornerback.

 
ReadMusic is offline
Old 02-24-2004, 04:43 AM   #7
DevilSaint
Apocalyptic Poster
 
DevilSaint's Avatar
 
Location: Not Here Anymore
Posts: 1,612
Default

Idiots. They might as well go ahead and sign Warren Sapp to an outragous contract too and officially end the Joe Gibbs honeymoon era in Washington.

Portis has been running behind an excellent offensive line against AFC West defenses. Throw him into Washington against NFC East defenses and welcome to Trung Candidate 2- Electric Bugaloo!

 
DevilSaint is offline
Old 02-24-2004, 12:04 PM   #8
Ap33west
Pledge
 
Location: left of hell and down a block
Posts: 95
Thumbs up

anybody remember when Portis was out last season? they put in a little dude named Quentin Griffin and he kicked ass. denver's got the depth and the O-line to sacrifice a running back for something they need.
from more personal experience, i watched Q play here at OU and he's just cool. i'd love to see him kickin ass w/ my broncos now.
__________________
YAY! I'M GONNA
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
IN HAWAII!
-Special Ed on Crank Yankers

 
Ap33west is offline
Old 02-24-2004, 12:08 PM   #9
Nimrod
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
 
Nimrod's Avatar
 
Location: the cross i'm bearing home 'aint indicative of my place
Posts: 5,410
Default

I hope they make this trade so that Toomer gets more TDs and Strahan eats Portis for lunch.

 
Nimrod is offline
Old 02-24-2004, 12:30 PM   #10
guz
El Gringo Mexicano
 
guz's Avatar
 
Location: I'd rather just have dome anyway
Posts: 8,599
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nimrod
I hope they make this trade so that Toomer gets more TDs and Strahan eats Portis for lunch.
in a couple of pointless games.

 
guz is offline
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Google


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.




Smashing Pumpkins, Alternative Music
& General Discussion Message Board and Forums
www.netphoria.org - Copyright © 1998-2020