Netphoria Message Board


Go Back   Netphoria Message Board > Archives > General Chat Archive
Register Netphoria's Amazon.com Link Members List

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2004, 12:13 PM   #1
Fall Down Blue
Banned
 
Fall Down Blue's Avatar
 
Location: i think rumsfeld should be king because hes a real patriot. just the other day i saw him testifying on the 9/11 commission and some guy asked him about y he didnt stop the plane attacks and he was like "i dnot know, f you fags" lol.
Posts: 4,821
Thumbs up Let's Invade Pakistan

Seriously, these guys have done worse crimes than Iraq. General Musharref has no incentive to help find bin Laden, because once he's found basically the US won't need his help anymore. They've waffled on whether or not this next story was true, first by denying it, then admitting it and then pardoning the man "responsible" for it. There is no doubt in my mind that this guy is a fall guy and scapegoat and the government knew about this all along. At the end I will provide links to other articles about it, but I'm posting this one even though it's a week old because I haven't seen a thread about it yet.

If any nation deserves to pay the price for indiscretion involving WMD, it's Pakistan... however, the US so far has decided to "support" them. How can we "support" a nation that publicly "pardons" the man who sold nukes to to North Korea, Iran and Libya?!

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiap...lear/index.html

Pakistan nuclear hero 'confesses'
Monday, February 2, 2004 Posted: 6:46 AM EST (1146 GMT)

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN) -- The man who founded Pakistan's nuclear program has confessed to transferring nuclear technology to North Korea, Iran and Libya, a government official told CNN Monday.

By the end of the week, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf is expected to address the nation and disclose the information *******d in Abdul Qadeer Khan's written confession.

The government maintains it has not sanctioned the transfer of any nuclear secrets.

Khan, regarded as a national hero, is being kept under tight security at his home in Islamabad, the official said. He is not allowed to leave or use the telephone.

Ahead of the admission, Pakistan had removed him from a government advisory post in the midst of an investigation into allegations that Pakistani officials shared nuclear technology with other nations, including Iran and Libya.

A government statement said Khan, who held a ministerial-level position, was removed from the post "to facilitate those investigations in a free and objective manner."

Up to this point, Khan had not been labeled a suspect. But Pakistani officials admitted the investigation has centered on him.

In December, Pakistan said some Pakistanis may have sold secrets, after U.N. inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities showed that "Pakistani-linked individuals" had acted as "intermediaries and black marketeers."

Pakistani scientists were later implicated in a scheme to sell high-tech centrifuge technology to Libya. They also have been named in probes into North Korea's nuclear program.

Pakistan has detained three former army officers and three people in the country's nuclear program as part of an investigation into the possible spread of the country's nuclear weapons technology, Pakistani intelligence sources said last month.

Top Pakistani officials, including Musharraf, attended a special session of the National Command Authority (NCA) Saturday to review the progress of the investigation. They issued a statement reiterating "Pakistan's strong resolve and commitment in adherence to international agreements of non-proliferation."

"It would never be in the national interest to share this technology in whatever form with any other country," the statement said.

The statement also said the government "condemns and distances itself in categorical terms from individual acts of indiscretion in the past," adding it was certain no such acts had taken place since the NCA was established in February 2000.

--------------------------------------------

Here's the denial:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiap...lear/index.html

In related news, shocker! Nukes found in Iran:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast...r.ap/index.html


So, should we go to war or not? Should we at least publicly condemn Pakistan? Sanctions? UN intervention? Why doesn't the UN seem to give a shit about this?

 
Fall Down Blue is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 12:17 PM   #2
Mayfuck
Banned
 
Location: i'm from japan also hollywood
Posts: 57,812
Red face

Too bad there's no oil in Pakistan. How can we expect to liberate a country when they don't have any oil to offer us

 
Mayfuck is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 12:19 PM   #3
MstrGhost
Apocalyptic Poster
 
MstrGhost's Avatar
 
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,805
Default

"Europeans Unite, let's invade USA. They are rulled by a crazy demented dictator that loves to invade countries for economical reasons. I promise a cheerleader for every European."

 
MstrGhost is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 12:20 PM   #4
Mayfuck
Banned
 
Location: i'm from japan also hollywood
Posts: 57,812
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MstrGhost
"Europeans Unite, let's invade USA. They are rulled by a crazy demented dictator that loves to invade countries for economical reasons. I promise a cheerleader for every European."
Yes!

Liberate us

 
Mayfuck is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 12:22 PM   #5
Nimrod
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
 
Nimrod's Avatar
 
Location: the cross i'm bearing home 'aint indicative of my place
Posts: 5,410
Default

Jesus Christ on a stick, you are the biggest troll ever. What's your obsession with me? Now you're duplicating my threads, too? Do you sit at home and think "how can I obsess over Nimrod today, I wonder?"

Dude, seriously, get your own life and seek professional help.



 
Nimrod is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:39 PM   #6
Fall Down Blue
Banned
 
Fall Down Blue's Avatar
 
Location: i think rumsfeld should be king because hes a real patriot. just the other day i saw him testifying on the 9/11 commission and some guy asked him about y he didnt stop the plane attacks and he was like "i dnot know, f you fags" lol.
Posts: 4,821
Default

what the fuck are you talking about?

 
Fall Down Blue is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:39 PM   #7
FaII Down Blue
Apocalyptic Poster
 
FaII Down Blue's Avatar
 
Location: i think rumsfeld should be king because hes a real patriot. just the other day i saw him testifying on the 9/11 commission and some guy asked him about y he didnt stop the plane attacks and he was like "i dnot know, f you fags" lol.
Posts: 3,340
Default

weeeeeeeeee!

 
FaII Down Blue is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:44 PM   #8
FaII Down Blue
Apocalyptic Poster
 
FaII Down Blue's Avatar
 
Location: i think rumsfeld should be king because hes a real patriot. just the other day i saw him testifying on the 9/11 commission and some guy asked him about y he didnt stop the plane attacks and he was like "i dnot know, f you fags" lol.
Posts: 3,340
Default


 
FaII Down Blue is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:44 PM   #9
FaII Down Blue
Apocalyptic Poster
 
FaII Down Blue's Avatar
 
Location: i think rumsfeld should be king because hes a real patriot. just the other day i saw him testifying on the 9/11 commission and some guy asked him about y he didnt stop the plane attacks and he was like "i dnot know, f you fags" lol.
Posts: 3,340
Default


 
FaII Down Blue is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:44 PM   #10
sppunk
Netphoria's George Will
 
sppunk's Avatar
 
Location: Fenway Park
Posts: 37,125
Default

Haha.

 
sppunk is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:55 PM   #11
slunky_munky
Demi-God
 
slunky_munky's Avatar
 
Posts: 252
Default

It fits all the criteria for Bush's war on terror. It should probably be #2 on the axis of evil behind Saudi Arabia.

It will be left well alone.

 
slunky_munky is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 02:58 PM   #12
Mayfuck
Banned
 
Location: i'm from japan also hollywood
Posts: 57,812
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by slunky_munky
It fits all the criteria for Bush's war on terror. It should probably be #2 on the axis of evil behind Saudi Arabia.

It will be left well alone.
Bush's criteria for terror also allows space for diplomacy. There is still a lot of diplomacy left to be done with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Ditto for North Korea. Unlike Iraq, those regimes have offered some sort of cooperation to an extent, whereas Iraq hardly offered any.

 
Mayfuck is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 03:07 PM   #13
MercuryChild
Apocalyptic Poster
 
MercuryChild's Avatar
 
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 1,023
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nimrod


"how can I obsess over trykristin today, I wonder?"
hypocrite

 
MercuryChild is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 04:39 PM   #14
Fall Down Blue
Banned
 
Fall Down Blue's Avatar
 
Location: i think rumsfeld should be king because hes a real patriot. just the other day i saw him testifying on the 9/11 commission and some guy asked him about y he didnt stop the plane attacks and he was like "i dnot know, f you fags" lol.
Posts: 4,821
Talking

down with pakistan, right nimrod?

 
Fall Down Blue is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 08:27 PM   #15
slunky_munky
Demi-God
 
slunky_munky's Avatar
 
Posts: 252
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mayfuck
Bush's criteria for terror also allows space for diplomacy. There is still a lot of diplomacy left to be done with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Ditto for North Korea. Unlike Iraq, those regimes have offered some sort of cooperation to an extent, whereas Iraq hardly offered any.
True, but I doubt the US (alone or with allies) would ever try to instigate change in Pakistan in any forceful way simply because it would be an enormous task that the public would not buy.

Diplomacy isn't a policy that Bush has designed for himself. It's his only practical option when it comes to these countries.

 
slunky_munky is offline
Old 02-12-2004, 08:34 PM   #16
DeviousJ
CORNFROST
 
DeviousJ's Avatar
 
Location: GUREITO DESU YO
Posts: 24,891
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mayfuck


Bush's criteria for terror also allows space for diplomacy. There is still a lot of diplomacy left to be done with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Ditto for North Korea. Unlike Iraq, those regimes have offered some sort of cooperation to an extent, whereas Iraq hardly offered any.
I agree with you, but diplomacy in what sense? It's unlikely they can be convinced to give up their dictatorships in the name of global democracy, so it becomes less about the interests of their people and more about 'what they can do for us'.
__________________

 
DeviousJ is offline
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Google


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.




Smashing Pumpkins, Alternative Music
& General Discussion Message Board and Forums
www.netphoria.org - Copyright © 1998-2020