ha ha ha the liberals are in nuclear meltdown

[teh b0lly!!1]

all these politics arguments on this board are like watching a 1.5 second gif loop into infinity

[Cool As Ice Cream]

however, just for once, for the sakes of unity, i wouldn't mind seeing an african american bass player in the band.
i'm sure there's plenty of talented ones about..

[smashingjj]

Originally Posted by Cool As Ice Cream

however, just for once, for the sakes of unity, i wouldn't mind seeing an african american bass player in the band.
i'm sure there's plenty of talented ones about..

See! As a white bass player this is where I pull the line. I'm not equal according to you libtards!

[smashingjj]

Originally Posted by Poots

I don't care if he has 70 lawsuits or 700. It doesn't change the fact that he's going to make america great again, even if he has to destroy it to do so.

You say that as though it will be some silly side effect

[ohnoitsbonnie]

What kind of person wants to see the world burn?

[ohnoitsbonnie]

I'm too old fashioned and don't want to see any kind of major regression or set back to humankind.

[smashingjj]

nah he has me convinced. Should have voted Trump!

[vixnix]

Originally Posted by teh b0lly!!1

all these politics arguments on this board are like watching a 1.5 second gif loop into infinity

and here we all are, just staring at it every day

[Disco King]

Originally Posted by ohnoitsbonnie

What kind of person wants to see the world burn?

Ah long time ahgo, ah whuz in Burma

ah rubay, the soize uv ah TANGERINE

[The Omega Concern]

Originally Posted by vixnix

and here we all are, just staring at it every day

Hey vix,

If I recall correctly you and I went off on a tangent in the Poli board election thread about the elite pedo rings. Well, you may find this interesting:

[Elphenor]

only if you're volunteering to be the first to go

[Elphenor]

the world would be so much better if I didn't have to share so much! Other people suck!

[Disco King]

Originally Posted by Poots

A realist. The world is fucked, humans are a cancer, technology and civilization are evil. The sooner we die back to a sustainable level the better for this planet and for enlightened humanity.

[Disco King]

Originally Posted by Elphenor

the world would be so much better if I didn't have to share so much! Other people suck!

The funny thing is that the lack of sustainability of our species has little to do with overpopulation. People in the developing world who are popping out the most kids aren't the people using up most of the resources. It's the developed world with rich fucks who drive two Hummers to work, one on each foot, like fucking roller skates. It's us who have to reduce our carbon footprint, and create green technologies before the developing world starts to demand living the sorts of lifestyles we do.

I mean, it wouldn't be bad if we slowed down population growth so that we could have true Fully-Automated Post-Scarcity Luxury Social Utopia. But we can do that through birth control and education, not fucking up the world so badly that maybe the world economy collapses and we have to go back to growing turnips on our lord's fiefdom. Especially because if we do that, the carbon we shit into the atmosphere is gonna be there for another few hundred years anyway, so it's not like we would just quickly start from scratch.

[vixnix]

You say birth control and education after stating that the problem is not contraception, but the consumptive lifestyles of those with fewer children.

So the solution is actually consumers in the developed world giving up a bunch of their shit.

Like beef, fast fashion, private motor vehicle transport and aircon.

Good luck with that

I think people would rather die while driving their air-conditioned ford through McD's drive through, picking up their quarter pounder meal, sitting behind the wheel in uniqlo, than have to give all that stuff up to live in the heat, eating salad and lentils, dressing in one of two bamboo outfits they own.

Because people are stupid and shitty, like that.

[Disco King]

Originally Posted by vixnix

You say birth control and education after stating that the problem is not contraception, but the consumptive lifestyles of those with fewer children.

I said that it wouldn't be bad if we had more contraception in the developing world, and that the smaller the world population, the higher the standard of life each person could have (up to a point; you need enough people for labour and stuff), but that doesn't mean that the population in the developing world is the significant reason for humanity being unsustainable as it is. I don't see how those two statements are contradictory.

Originally Posted by vixnix

So the solution is actually consumers in the developed world giving up a bunch of their shit.

Like beef, fast fashion, private motor vehicle transport and aircon.

Good luck with that

I think people would rather die while driving their air-conditioned ford through McD's drive through, picking up their quarter pounder meal, sitting behind the wheel in uniqlo, than have to give all that stuff up to live in the heat, eating salad and lentils, dressing in one of two bamboo outfits they own.

Because people are stupid and shitty, like that.

I dunno, places like Sweden have a much smaller carbon footprint per capita than places like the U.S. or Canada, and the average Swede isn't living off of a diet that consists of what he or she grows in his or her backyard.

Part of the answer will be individuals making decisions to limit their footprint, like being smarter with water and eating less meat and stuff like that. Another big part will be on the societal level, such as internalizing environmental externalities through carbon pricing.

But yeah, easier said than done. I'm off to Carl's Jr. to eat a meal that has way more calories than I need and required more water and carbon to produce per calorie than something healthier would require. Then I'm probably going to kill myself.

[redbreegull]

if everyone like poots uhh disappeared there would be a lot more resources to go around

[Elphenor]

I don't think any progress on carbon emissions happens until the gov puts down regulations

[fuzzyroes]

Even if they did, it wouldn't stop foreign countries like China from polluting the world into oblivion

Use some sense

[Elphenor]

It's what the U.N. is for and it's mostly the US rejecting treaties to globally reduce because we have a political party that thinks global warming is not happening

[redbreegull]

Originally Posted by fuzzyroes

Even if they did, it wouldn't stop foreign countries like China from polluting the world into oblivion

Use some sense

yeah you can't stop your neighbor from throwing trash on the ground, so you might as well throw even MORE trash on the ground, right? I mean that makes total sense

[redbreegull]

USE SOME SENSE

[The Omega Concern]

Originally Posted by Elphenor

It's what the U.N. is for and it's mostly the US rejecting treaties to globally reduce because we have a political party that thinks global warming is not happening

Global Warming? I thought they gave up the ghost on that term and opted for Climate Change. Besides, you mean anthropogenic effects on the climate and whether there's causation.

The U.N. exist for the Marxist extortionist that inhabit it. Any political stance they take is to further their global governance agenda, part of which is to arrest people who challenge the GW/CC narrative. We'd all be better off to kick those crooks out of New York, let them find another country to pillage.

[FlamingGlobes]

[vixnix]

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

Hey vix,

If I recall correctly you and I went off on a tangent in the Poli board election thread about the elite pedo rings. Well, you may find this interesting:

I didn't see this before... will probably not be able to resist the urge to look into it.

Aren't Trump and Epstein accused of the same thing?

They're all disgusting depraved sacks of meat IMO.

[vixnix]

It's true that the planet is fine and that my aversion to having turtles eating plastic bags is really more to do with aesthetic preferences. I just think it makes the earth look a bit povo.

[vixnix]

You know what's truly tragic and ironic, is that decades ago, if trump had been in similar trouble because of his illegal indiscretions, Hillary Clinton would have been a great choice for him, in terms of representation at court.

[redbreegull]

well that's her job as an intelligent legal professional with an intimate understanding of law and policy

[vixnix]

without the inconvenience and burden of a human soul

[The Omega Concern]

Originally Posted by vixnix

I didn't see this before... will probably not be able to resist the urge to look into it.

Aren't Trump and Epstein accused of the same thing?

They're all disgusting depraved sacks of meat IMO.

Epstein is rumoured to be Mossad and has plenty of video on all sorts of movers and shakers which visited that island of his. Trump's rape case which alleges he and Epstein repeatedly raping a 13 y.o. girl in '94, goes to court next month. Needless to say, it'll be interesting to see how that all shakes out.

There's a pic floating around of a naked Bill Clinton getting a massage by a woman. If it isn't him, it's a lookalike, but it sure appears to be him. I'd guess the pic is the real deal and a threat of some type to Clinton to let him know they got pics and vids on him and they're willing to leak it out.

Then there's the Podesta brothers and the creepy inside 'pizza' lingo. That one appears the closest to getting exposed and wreaking havoc on these elite rings.