Nearly all US troops in Iraq home by end of 2011

sppunk · 10-21-2011, 06:02 PM

Only around 200 will remain.

Praise God. Entirely too late, but whatever. Leave Afghanistan now too.

Nimrod's Son · 10-21-2011, 07:19 PM

I told you all he'd wait until 2012 to do this. Ahh, election cycles.

Toast · 10-21-2011, 07:37 PM

Good. Iraq's been a money pit for way too long and it has been the axis of this country's swirl around the toilet.

Order 66 · 10-21-2011, 07:43 PM

my understanding is the drawdawn would be more gradual. that sounds steep. but whatevs just get it done with i guess

Nimrod's Son · 10-21-2011, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Order 66

my understanding is the drawdawn would be more gradual. that sounds steep. but whatevs just get it done with i guess

It's steep because he wants it done before the debates

sppunk · 10-21-2011, 08:59 PM

Totally agree on the election cycle, but it's good for those families and this country.

samuel redman · 10-21-2011, 11:16 PM

add 40,000 to the jobless list

Nimrod's Son · 10-22-2011, 02:16 PM

I actually heard more about this - this was Bush's original timeline in so much as there's an agreement that US soldiers are not subject to Iraqi law until Jan 1, 2012.

There was a provision for negotiation to extend that time, but Obama chose not to.

My friends who were in Iraq have been saying there's no way they can defend themselves with no troops and it's going to become an Iranian warzone.

MyOneAndOnly · 10-22-2011, 02:42 PM

Omega Concern, where are you?

duovamp · 10-22-2011, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nimrod's Son

My friends who were in Iraq have been saying there's no way they can defend themselves with no troops and it's going to become an Iranian warzone.

Nothing to unite a country like war tbh.

Trotskilicious · 10-23-2011, 01:59 AM

myeah

Trotskilicious · 10-23-2011, 01:59 AM

what is to be done

Eulogy · 10-23-2011, 03:37 PM

it's bush's timeline but obama did it because of the election cycles

right ok got it

Future Boy · 10-23-2011, 04:35 PM

more like it's bushs timeline, which was done for the election cycles, and obama was smart enough not to change it.

there, that works

Eulogy · 10-23-2011, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Future Boy

more like it's bushs timeline, which was done for the election cycles, and obama was smart enough not to change it.

there, that works

or maybe there wasn't like, a reason to change it so he didn't

Eulogy · 10-23-2011, 04:51 PM

it's just fucking obnoxious that a 100% non-controversial thing gets sucked in and spun around in a million different ways.

fuck evvvveryone

Trotskilicious · 10-23-2011, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Future Boy

more like it's bushs timeline, which was done for the election cycles, and obama was smart enough not to change it.

there, that works

maybe he was not smart enough to change it

Future Boy · 10-23-2011, 05:47 PM

there's that too

Trotskilicious · 10-23-2011, 05:51 PM

eulogy does have a point though this is a victory and a relief and now we can really focus on what the fuck to do about afghanistan

Future Boy · 10-23-2011, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eulogy

fuck evvvveryone

Future Boy · 10-23-2011, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trotskilicious

eulogy does have a point though this is a victory and a relief and now we can really focus on what the fuck to do about afghanistan

this is one of those things were the spin is really pointless. its just plain good for obama. Lets say it was Bushs timeline and obama looked at it and said, that gives me cover to just let it ride out, like letting the taxcuts sunset rather than a straight repeal. Who cares, it's a win.

Trotskilicious · 10-23-2011, 06:27 PM

seriously though afghanistan?

Future Boy · 10-23-2011, 06:47 PM

maybe after the elections.

or before the next.

The Omega Concern · 10-23-2011, 07:28 PM

Every move the military makes is aimed to fulfill the CFR's agenda of estabishing total control over resources through war.

Quote:

originally posted by Nimrod's Son:

My friends who were in Iraq have been saying there's no way they can defend themselves with no troops and it's going to become an Iranian warzone.

This would fall in line with the bigger agenda to start a miltary WWIII. Best I can filter through the sources (without getting into the esoteric false Gog/Mogag staged re-hash of a war) is that in order for this war to happen, Bin-Laden and Qaddaffi needed to be out of the way first. They both made deals with the CIA and the CIA used both of them to rat out each other. Each leading their factions of muslims against America and each other...a clusterfuck that the MIC was fine with for years until recently since the gameplan needs to change.

When you also ******* Saddam and Mubarack and how the U.S. has diplomatic control over these governments, you can see the tri-angulation against Iran. With Syria possibly next to fall, it appears just a matter of time before some provacation of some type on either Iran or Isreal's part is what elitist anglophiles are conjuring up to trigger full blown war in the region.

Much if not all of this however is meant for distraction from the rape of the western world by the elitist bankers who many in the world are waking up to which only hastens the elitists need to create a bigger distraction.

btw...Any word on these troops being re-deployed elsewhere in the region or are they being sent home just in time for the riots here next year?

duovamp · 10-23-2011, 07:47 PM

Lot of effort just to make a distraction, don't you think? Oh no, wait, you're playing the troll too hard here. This is all a horrendous tarp. I will play your games no more.

killtrocity · 10-24-2011, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

Every move the military makes is aimed to fulfill the CFR's agenda of estabishing total control over resources through war.

yes

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern

This would fall in line with the bigger agenda to start a miltary WWIII.

no

10-21-2011, 06:02 PM	#1
sppunk Netphoria's George Will Location: Fenway Park Posts: 37,125	Nearly all US troops in Iraq home by end of 2011 Only around 200 will remain. Praise God. Entirely too late, but whatever. Leave Afghanistan now too.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
9/11/01..........9/11/11	The Omega Concern	General Chat Archive	70	09-30-2011 07:28 PM
COUNTERCULTURE MAINSTREAM	Jesus Cambodia	Pumpkins Archive	5	01-17-2009 10:24 AM
Spinoff: US Places	ravenguy2000	General Chat Archive	11	01-11-2009 11:56 AM
US troops to pull out of iraq completely within three years	redbull	General Chat Archive	10	08-22-2008 01:34 AM
im pretty keen to get rid of this rake fighter bit	sweetturpentine	General Chat Archive	27	06-17-2007 10:10 AM

10-21-2011, 07:19 PM	#2
Nimrod's Son Master of Karate and Friendship Location: in your butt Posts: 72,943	I told you all he'd wait until 2012 to do this. Ahh, election cycles.

10-21-2011, 07:37 PM	#3
Toast Apocalyptic Poster Location: Woodinville, Wa. Posts: 3,193	Good. Iraq's been a money pit for way too long and it has been the axis of this country's swirl around the toilet.

10-21-2011, 07:43 PM	#4
Order 66 Socialphobic Posts: 11,883	my understanding is the drawdawn would be more gradual. that sounds steep. but whatevs just get it done with i guess

10-21-2011, 08:59 PM	#6
sppunk Netphoria's George Will Location: Fenway Park Posts: 37,125	Totally agree on the election cycle, but it's good for those families and this country.

10-21-2011, 11:16 PM	#7
samuel redman Apocalyptic Poster Location: You're 22 why aren't you free?You're 22 why aren't you free? you're mom and daddy's victory Posts: 4,876	add 40,000 to the jobless list

10-22-2011, 02:16 PM	#8
Nimrod's Son Master of Karate and Friendship Location: in your butt Posts: 72,943	I actually heard more about this - this was Bush's original timeline in so much as there's an agreement that US soldiers are not subject to Iraqi law until Jan 1, 2012. There was a provision for negotiation to extend that time, but Obama chose not to. My friends who were in Iraq have been saying there's no way they can defend themselves with no troops and it's going to become an Iranian warzone.

10-22-2011, 02:42 PM	#9
MyOneAndOnly Shut the fuck up! Location: "Okay, white power feminist" - yo soy el mejor Posts: 21,943	Omega Concern, where are you?

10-23-2011, 01:59 AM	#11
Trotskilicious Banned Location: I believe in the transcendental qualities of friendship. Posts: 39,602	myeah

10-23-2011, 03:37 PM	#13
Eulogy huh Posts: 62,362	it's bush's timeline but obama did it because of the election cycles right ok got it

10-23-2011, 04:35 PM	#14
Future Boy The Man of Tomorrow Posts: 26,972	more like it's bushs timeline, which was done for the election cycles, and obama was smart enough not to change it. there, that works

10-23-2011, 04:51 PM	#16
Eulogy huh Posts: 62,362	it's just fucking obnoxious that a 100% non-controversial thing gets sucked in and spun around in a million different ways. fuck evvvveryone

10-23-2011, 05:47 PM	#18
Future Boy The Man of Tomorrow Posts: 26,972	there's that too

10-23-2011, 05:51 PM	#19
Trotskilicious Banned Location: I believe in the transcendental qualities of friendship. Posts: 39,602	eulogy does have a point though this is a victory and a relief and now we can really focus on what the fuck to do about afghanistan

10-23-2011, 06:27 PM	#22
Trotskilicious Banned Location: I believe in the transcendental qualities of friendship. Posts: 39,602	seriously though afghanistan?

10-23-2011, 06:47 PM	#23
Future Boy The Man of Tomorrow Posts: 26,972	maybe after the elections. or before the next.

10-23-2011, 07:47 PM	#25
duovamp Brazilian Blouselord Location: heavy metal pool party Posts: 35,674	Lot of effort just to make a distraction, don't you think? Oh no, wait, you're playing the troll too hard here. This is all a horrendous tarp. I will play your games no more.