Netphoria Message Board


Go Back   Netphoria Message Board > Archives > General Chat Archive
Register Netphoria's Amazon.com Link Members List Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2002, 12:39 PM   #1
obscured01
Minion of Satan
 
obscured01's Avatar
 
Location: DFW Tejas
Posts: 9,693
Exclamation Quick math question....

Ok... I have 3 systems, with 3 variables, x,y,and z. Can I use cramer's rule to solve this? Or must I go through and figure the matrices to get the answer to the x, y and z variables?

Here's the equations:

2x + 3y 0z = 800
3x + 0y +3z = 650
0x + 1y ***z = 350

I know there has to be an easier way to solve this without having to put it into a matrix. I would use subsitution if I knew how to do that with 3 equations...

I was absent the day we went over this in class and it doesn't explain how in the book... we have a quiz today... help?


------------------
~*Sarah Kimberly*~

...and the tragic and
romantic ascent...

AIM: Gazing Iscariot

[This message has been edited by obscured01 (edited 10-01-2002).]

 
obscured01 is offline
Old 10-01-2002, 01:05 PM   #2
obscured01
Minion of Satan
 
obscured01's Avatar
 
Location: DFW Tejas
Posts: 9,693
Angry

*bump* help http://www.netphoria.org/wwwboard/frown.gif

 
obscured01 is offline
Old 10-01-2002, 01:13 PM   #3
scouse_dave
Minion of Satan
 
scouse_dave's Avatar
 
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,089
Arrow

i can help...gimme a sec whilst i type some stuff out
__________________
i could be a genius...if i put my mind to it

 
scouse_dave is offline
Old 10-01-2002, 01:20 PM   #4
scouse_dave
Minion of Satan
 
scouse_dave's Avatar
 
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,089
Lightbulb

cramer's rule doesn't ring a bell in all honesty, maybe when i learnt linear algebra, we called it something else.

regardless, tho, it's probably just a shorthand of sorts for simplifying the system of equations..you can always solve it with normal row/column operations in matrix form

personally, i wouldn't even bother with using matrices as the system is quite simple...it should be fairly obvious to you that with only 3 variables (2 non-zero in each case) the asnwer should fall out pretty quickly

1. multipy row (3) by to get
3y+3z=1050

2. row (3) - row (2) gives
-3x+3y=400
(call this Q)

3. row (1) - Q gives
5x = 200 => x=40

basic substitution should find you y and z

in a sense, this IS using the matrix method without writing out the matrix in each case

hope that's some help

__________________
i could be a genius...if i put my mind to it

 
scouse_dave is offline
Old 10-01-2002, 01:21 PM   #5
obscured01
Minion of Satan
 
obscured01's Avatar
 
Location: DFW Tejas
Posts: 9,693
Smile

yes, thank you. I'm stupid when it comes to math if I don't have everything fully explained. Gracias http://www.netphoria.org/wwwboard/smile.gif

------------------
~*Sarah Kimberly*~

...and the tragic and
romantic ascent...

AIM: Gazing Iscariot

 
obscured01 is offline
Old 10-01-2002, 01:31 PM   #6
scouse_dave
Minion of Satan
 
scouse_dave's Avatar
 
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,089
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by obscured01:
I would use subsitution if I knew how to do that with 3 equations...
if you're ever in doubt..just pick an equation at random, and substitute it into another of the equations...

it may not always be the most effecient answer, but in cases like this, you'll always get the answer
__________________
i could be a genius...if i put my mind to it

 
scouse_dave is offline
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Google


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 AM.




Smashing Pumpkins, Alternative Music
& General Discussion Message Board and Forums
www.netphoria.org - Copyright © 1998-2020