RollingStone Review Prediction

Kevin3381 · 07-16-2007, 11:17 AM

How many stars??

SpFission · 07-16-2007, 11:19 AM

3 or more...since aren't they supposed to be on the cover soon?

pete · 07-16-2007, 11:22 AM

I dont think i can remember the critics opinions being split so much before. i'd guess 3/5 or something like that.

The Trashbirds · 07-16-2007, 11:22 AM

Well, after them insinuating that Billy wrote that parody of an open letter, who the fuck knows?

I am genuinely surprised by these mixed reviews.

Of all the reviews that hate the album, other than production issues, they all seem to hate very different things and pick on very different things. One even said Jimmy's drumming sucked while all the others said that was among the only stand-out quality characteristics of the album.

Same goes for the positive ones. Some say "Bring the Light" rules while others say "skip this Zwany song and check out Doomsday Clock."

Honestly, these things are all over the place.

All of them seem to agree however: Billy is a douchebag.

if there is a llama · 07-16-2007, 11:27 AM

I'll say it gets two stars and a bad review, but in a different part of the magazine, a smaller article will talk about how one of the songs is a must listen (and probably contradict everything the review said). Rolling stone likes to do that to cover their bases.

Corgan Rules · 07-16-2007, 11:33 AM

They are a shitty magazine with shitty reviewers, so I predict a 2 1/2 or a 3 star. Thta magazine just doesn't have a clue!

Boycott Graceland · 07-16-2007, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corgan Rules

They are a shitty magazine with shitty reviewers, so I predict a 2 1/2 or a 3 star. Thta magazine just doesn't have a clue!

are you a troll?

those fucking retards gave weezer's green album five stars

they are a total industry promotional tool these days. there's no credibility to them at all. i'm sure they will give zeitgeist 4 or more stars

teamneedle · 07-16-2007, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boycott Graceland

are you a troll?

those fucking retards gave weezer's green album five stars

they are a total industry promotional tool these days. there's no credibility to them at all. i'm sure they will give zeitgeist 4 or more stars

they must have felt swoll for the 5 star green album review because it is no longer up there.

bigleaguechew · 07-16-2007, 11:45 AM

4 stars.

M.Night · 07-16-2007, 11:52 AM

who cares?

theFoulLasagna · 07-16-2007, 12:30 PM

they didn't give the green album 5 stars. they did say that pinkerton was one of the worst albums of the year back in 1996, but if you go look at it now on the website, they have it with a 5 star review.

but, they had a live video review of zeitgeist that was very positive. i predict 3 to 3 1/2

Rider · 07-16-2007, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theFoulLasagna

they didn't give the green album 5 stars. they did say that pinkerton was one of the worst albums of the year back in 1996, but if you go look at it now on the website, they have it with a 5 star review.

but, they had a live video review of zeitgeist that was very positive. i predict 3 to 3 1/2

Guess what most Weezer fans hated that album when it came out also. That has to be the bigest example of an album that improves with age.

teamneedle · 07-16-2007, 12:46 PM

Rolling Stone doesn't even know what year it is.

They just posted the Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire review on their main page.
Meanwhile, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the movie in theaters.

so you might want to expect them to repost the machina review instead of zeitgeist.

schmokes · 07-16-2007, 02:38 PM

I'm predicting 3 starzzzzz.

Brute Squad · 07-16-2007, 02:53 PM

I'm predicting that I don't give a shit.

gossamer1234 · 07-16-2007, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Fogelsong

I'm predicting that I don't give a shit.

yep. rollingstone's music reviews are almost as lame as their movie reviews. i wish they were as irrelevant.

Rider · 07-16-2007, 03:01 PM

I also love the way that it's already setup that people are going to bitch no mater what they give it.

07-16-2007, 11:17 AM	#1
Kevin3381 Amish Rake Fighter Posts: 6	RollingStone Review Prediction How many stars??

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-16-2007, 11:19 AM	#2
SpFission Apocalyptic Poster Location: MA Posts: 2,905	3 or more...since aren't they supposed to be on the cover soon?

07-16-2007, 11:22 AM	#3
pete Apocalyptic Poster Location: London Posts: 1,597	I dont think i can remember the critics opinions being split so much before. i'd guess 3/5 or something like that.

07-16-2007, 11:22 AM	#4
The Trashbirds Ownz Posts: 537	Well, after them insinuating that Billy wrote that parody of an open letter, who the fuck knows? I am genuinely surprised by these mixed reviews. Of all the reviews that hate the album, other than production issues, they all seem to hate very different things and pick on very different things. One even said Jimmy's drumming sucked while all the others said that was among the only stand-out quality characteristics of the album. Same goes for the positive ones. Some say "Bring the Light" rules while others say "skip this Zwany song and check out Doomsday Clock." Honestly, these things are all over the place. All of them seem to agree however: Billy is a douchebag.

07-16-2007, 11:27 AM	#5
if there is a llama Demi-God Location: Columbus, Ohio Posts: 435	I'll say it gets two stars and a bad review, but in a different part of the magazine, a smaller article will talk about how one of the songs is a must listen (and probably contradict everything the review said). Rolling stone likes to do that to cover their bases.

07-16-2007, 11:33 AM	#6
Corgan Rules Apocalyptic Poster Posts: 2,019	They are a shitty magazine with shitty reviewers, so I predict a 2 1/2 or a 3 star. Thta magazine just doesn't have a clue!

07-16-2007, 11:45 AM	#9
bigleaguechew Pledge Posts: 104	4 stars.

07-16-2007, 12:30 PM	#11
theFoulLasagna Demi-God Location: smell the glove Posts: 360	they didn't give the green album 5 stars. they did say that pinkerton was one of the worst albums of the year back in 1996, but if you go look at it now on the website, they have it with a 5 star review. but, they had a live video review of zeitgeist that was very positive. i predict 3 to 3 1/2

07-16-2007, 12:46 PM	#13
teamneedle Ownz Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 905	Rolling Stone doesn't even know what year it is. They just posted the Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire review on their main page. Meanwhile, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the movie in theaters. so you might want to expect them to repost the machina review instead of zeitgeist.

07-16-2007, 02:38 PM	#14
schmokes Demi-God Location: Eye Lasers Posts: 280	I'm predicting 3 starzzzzz.

07-16-2007, 02:53 PM	#15
Brute Squad oh for fuck's sake Location: Austin, TX Posts: 2,507	I'm predicting that I don't give a shit.

07-16-2007, 03:01 PM	#17
Rider Minion of Satan Location: I was born a snake handler, and I'll die a snake handler Posts: 7,883	I also love the way that it's already setup that people are going to bitch no mater what they give it.