eh okay, you didn't actually say what you wanted to say then, namely that they can consent while making an informed decision, what you said is that
they make a lousy consenting adult, that bargaining chips are used on them, that they are brainwashed and get self validation out of that encounter.
and now that they are more likely to say yes, without taking into account that they just might have other reasons than being brainwashed, having no self worth or being intoxicated by fame to "be more likely to say yes".
and you broadly made that generalisation, which is where my problem with this labelling lies.
|