Ok, one more.
But again, like I said three times already, the argument here is about the definition of terms and then everyone is veiling that argument within other arguments that aren't even happening. If the issue is "it's not appropriate to critique West's point for accuracy when you understand his bigger point because it introduces unnecessary doubt and obscures the claim," I don't understand why that can't just be stated instead of arguing via strawmen like "how can anyone say things aren't worse now than four years ago?" (when no one said that)
now I'm off my soap box. carry on
|