Thread: Back to Billy?
View Single Post
Old 11-17-2017, 11:01 AM   #34
fuzzyroes
Banned
 
Posts: 21,169
Default

Even though I doubt that the label was expecting big sales, they probably shit their pants in a panic when it debuted at 183 or whatever it was. They probably said "sorry Billy, but this ain't gonna fly... It's gonna be sold under the name Billy Corgan". One has to imagine that Billy couldn't have been too happy about it. It's curious that he hasn't addressed it.

I wonder if the actual pressings will be changed as well... I'm guessing not.

 
fuzzyroes is offline