Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler
To be more specific: Does it seem reasonable to think of art as something a person should only be able to access fully and freely if they have the money to do so?
|
It's a complicated question. Their right to consume art freely given to the public or them is obviously reasonable. But can you force an artist to give up their art to someone who they don't want to have it? Is art 'out there' once it's out there and that's it?