topleybird is the only one on the level here.
The "obvious" is that he's actively participated in (what I'm sure he'd consider) the intellectual justification for a disrupter like Trump. The cop-out is that he never acknowledges the collateral shrapnel that comes with supporting this dude. It's like he and Alex Jones believe he's a harbinger but are incapable because of their position to acknowledge the divisive ripping of the social fabric he's wrought.
Interestingly, there is some intersection topleybird is onto with the Williamson candidacy and what he found worth exploring in Trump.
|