WHAT THE FUCK. New law about people under 18 driving
 

They will only be allowed one passenger?

WHAT THE HELL IS THAT ABOUT? THAT MAKES NO SENSE.

gr

Anyone else heard anything about this?

You'll understand when you're older, son.

[nelson]HA HA![/nelson]

Die.

This could cause big problems for some stuff though. Transportation is a big enough pain in the ass as is. Arg

Good. You little crazy fucks behind the wheel. In the past five years, I've been hit by two of you little fuckers.

I got my licence at 15.

Gotta love Montana.

Ha ha! Neener-neener, jailbait! :p

WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THE NUMBER OF PASSENGERS IN A CAR?

A shitty driver is a shitty driver. ahhhh

People under 25 shouldn't be allowed to drive.

Distractions.

Teens tend to act crazier when in groups, to impress their friends.

If you've got lots of dumb little fuckers in the car, it distracts the little fucking driver.

But then all the 25-year-old drivers would suck.

It's less about the age and more about the experience.

Ok, true. But. I don't know. That would just be so terribly inconvenient. Stupid kids who don't know how to drive ruining it for everyone else.

Eh.

more kids in the car causes more distraction to the driver.

Ok, it makes sense.

Still pisses me off.

Wrong. The hormonal level of anyone younger (ESPECIALLY TEENS) makes your brain fucked up.

http://www.wsu.edu/DrUniverse/Contents.html

So you think it's a good idea for the most inexperienced/immature drivers on the road to be able to have lots of passengers (distractions)?

TIME TO BUY A BUS PASS!

Well no.

But. It would still be a pain in the ass. And not all younger drivers are dumbshits who can't pay attention when they drive. So. I don't know.

I'm sorry, but of the 2 wrecks I was in when I was under 18 were all caused by middle aged men on their cell phones/not paying attention and running through red lights/stop signs at 50 mph.

There's more morons that are old than dangerous young drivers.

well, now you have an excuse to stick your friends in the trunk.

The law might be an inconvienence for you. There will always be dumbshit drivers... but if this law will potentially save some lives, isn't it worth it?

yeah, somehow my neighbor, who is legally blind and 80 years old, STILL HAS A FUCKING LICENSE. AND SHE'S BEEN IN 3 ACCIDENTS IN THE LAST 5 YEARS LOLOLOL SHE STILL HAS HER LICENSE LOLOLOLOL

Lots of laws could potentially save lives. How many people die in traffic accidents related to wreckless drivers ages 16 or 17 that had more than one passenger in the car?? I mean, really. It doesn't seem like it would save many lives.

In California no licensed driver under the age of 18 can drive with a passenger that is under 21. Also, they can't drive after a certain hour (10 pm, perhaps) and can only drive to work or school.

The reason for these laws is to try and avoid a bunch of kids piling in a car and taking off for parties. When they get in a drunken wreck, it's only 2 dead kids rather than 7.

Kids need to remember that they aren't adults. That they get to drive at all is a priviledge, and they need to recognize that.

HAR HAR HAR OK DAD.

Kids 13-21 should be shipped to Canada and be forced into slave labor. That and rap-metal should be made illegal.

This is law only for the first six months. After six months, kids under 18 can drive with whomever and go whenever they want.

Ah. My buddy's younger brother is all pissed off about the restrictions.

Eulogy, where did you hear about this proposed law anyway? Is it a state thing or is someone trying to make it federal?