there is a difference between divergent syntax choice and a word salad sandwich.

for example dade you could have written that sentence without sounding like a resentful manchild but you think thats a legitimate worldview so you are going full bore

it was still legible though, because you don't believe billy corgan has hacked your computer & is stealing your music

like what is this

a dangerous and large radical element of one religion

this element if being blamed for terrorist events

these are terrorist events the aforementioned radical religious group did NOT commit despite where the blame is falling

this makes them the choice scapegoat for oligarchs?

like... yeah I dunno just what is this

is he talking about Islam? that's what would contextually make sense but then it seems like he is saying some group which is in fact dangerous and radical is actually being framed for something they AREN'T doing?

Steve King should go back to writing about sentient automobiles with a mean streak.

its almost as if all these false-flag attacks are counterproductive and nonsensical!

i maed this for u

BUT HE'S MEXICAN HE CAN'T POSSIBLY BE RACIST YOU FOOL

oh true true

Seriously, does that fat orange retard ever do something else than sending angry Twitter messages about how butthurt he is?

Talk about special snowflakes...

Case in point https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonal...67881516679168

I can not decipher the meaning of that

Only if you're willing to admit you're as dense as Trots and can't deduce a simple double-negative and while displaying that ignorance, claim it's word salad.

deduce means trace the course or derivation of.

double negatives are never to be used so i'm not sure what i'm tracing the course of and why its so simple, they're bad syntax and improper english and i'm not a stickler but using double negatives makes it hard for people to understand you

ultimately the sentence doesn't make sense as is because i think you mean to say "Only if you're willing to admit you're as dense as Trots, who can't understand a simple double negative and, displaying his ignorance, claims its word salad." thats a 100% better sentence

one of the helpful ways to tell if you should use its or it's is to say it out loud

its ironic how high-falootin' omega's language thinks it is considering how much resentment he has for academics. omega would always rather use a fancy looking latin word when a plain english one will do, he frequently misues words (like deduce - a latin word ps) as synonyms for other simple words which mean something else, plus all the ultra specific neologisms, truther jargon and conspiracy portmanteaus... every time i read one of his posts i think of orwell's essay on political writing and how much of a abomination of writing every one of omega's posts is

everyone should read this: http://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/...nglish/e_polit

Beliefs are inconsequential to the truth. I disregard my own when searching. There is a preponderance of evidence that suggest it wasn't 19 hijackers with box-cutters, per the conspiracy theory our government to this day sticks to.

One reality doesn't eliminate the other.


He's an outsider to the Satanic Baal cocksuckers who infiltrated our government long ago.


You're legitimately another stumped SJW who can't think past your indoctrinated identity politics. Had he put a ban on all the 57 or so countries run by Muslim's, you might have a point.
I don't put him on a pedestal. He's already been compromised and most of that has come from the Bush Neo-Con's who need to protect that family to protect themselves.

The Oligarchs/Cabalist version of the Hegelian Dialectic is not that broad of a concept to understand. Give it a try. Problem-reaction-solution. Create the problem (9/11) wait for the reaction (public Fear) present the solution (War on Terror/Patriot Act which develops the current Stasi like intelligence we have now)

Because though our government for decades have antagonized these muslims to hate us, the radicals among them hate regardless: just ask the Hindu's, Jews, Buddhist, Christians, women and gays they persecute to this day.

Our government since Bush and especially Obama have been using/importing terror cells into this country to set up as patsy's, in many cases, for false flag terror events (Boston Bombing for one, the two brothers with the FBI ties got set up) and many have folded into our government wishing to undermine it. The former CIA director Brennan would be a prime example.

So these types need to be vetted out of our government first, then the nation all the while keeping these elements out of the country to begin with.


But if you're understanding of immigration is to scream racism or some phobia for not wanting open borders, then there's no hope for you.

del

del

i don't want to talk to you, you're a disturbed person and you ruin my day

if God talks to Billy Corgan through the radio, and Billy Corgan talks to TOC through his songs... it's kind of like TOC is basically God, right?

Projecting. Typical Alinsky commie tactic. You just can't help yourself, can you? If you wouldn't talk so much shit, I wouldn't respond in kind to shut you up.

If you'd like to discuss SOURCE in the relevant thread, I'd be happy too.

well they are the majority in a certain part of my city and they voted for a party of which the main focus is integration and equality for a.o. gay people

have you ever met a muslim

cause i'm guessing you just read about them on breitbart

sorry for the prejudice