Netphoria Message Board

Netphoria Message Board (http://forums.netphoria.org/index.php)
-   General Chat Message Board (http://forums.netphoria.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Which Middle-Earth character are you? (http://forums.netphoria.org/showthread.php?t=184409)

redbreegull 01-10-2017 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poots (Post 4309523)
Before the movies Tolkien was the next Shakespeare but now that he's a pop star his "writing itself is a little pedestrian" and "really prosaic and extremely overwrought in its pretension." These same types of people dislike Nirvana because they "sold out."

is that true though? The Hobbit was a kids book and the author took two decades to publish a sequel, which turned out to be a thousand-paged tome full of made up languages. LOTR didn't really start to take off in popularity until the 60s when young hippies and potheads decided they identified with it and it was like groovy man.

Tolkien only lived 10 more years and never published anything else major on Middle-earth. I think LOTR was always curled away in a little niche of pop fiction. Yes, it is quite popular especially these days after the movies, but I don't think many people ever considered Tolkien to be a modern Shakespeare that's pretty out there

redbreegull 01-10-2017 05:04 PM

and yeah the writing just isn't magnificent for the most part, it's hard to disagree with that. Tolkien was an etymologist who basically wrote fiction as a hobby. The Hobbit started out as something funny to make his kid laugh

Run To Me 01-10-2017 05:16 PM

Been awhile since I cracked my red-leathered copy (last couple times I tried I couldn't help but see Elijah Woods huge ass watery hobbit eyes etc) but seems everything was "grey." Pale "grey" this and stony "grey" that and hills and skies of thickest "grey." His visual descriptive language, at least, struck me as underdeveloped

duovamp 01-10-2017 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poots (Post 4309585)
I guess you can take issue with it if you don't like his writing style. It's definitely not a GRRRRR Martin rape-on-every-other-page style that is written for short attention span millennials. Some people like the slower pace, the back story, the immersive world that Tolkien has built and lets his story play out in way that is not written with a future screenplay in mind. It's not Dean Koontz or Stephen King; its a modern epic and I think that it excels at that and his style fits it perfectly.

Youvthink ASoIAF isn't immersive or has less backstory? He's literally called American Tolkien.

duovamp 01-10-2017 08:39 PM

Sleazy? Or like just things that actually happened in real life not in the children's fantasy of Tolkien?

buzzard 01-10-2017 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poots (Post 4309506)
These same cretins would have espoused the literary prowess of Tolkien before all the movies came out, but now that the story is so popular it is au courant to shit on his writing.

It's probably a little generous to assume that anything above eleven percent of the people discussing Tolkien today had read the books before those movies came out, let's face it.

In any case, the movies only make Tolkien look like some sort of erudite demigod of caramelized genius by comparison.

redbreegull 01-10-2017 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poots (Post 4309585)
I guess you can take issue with it if you don't like his writing style. It's definitely not a GRRRRR Martin rape-on-every-other-page style that is written for short attention span millennials. Some people like the slower pace, the back story, the immersive world that Tolkien has built and lets his story play out in way that is not written with a future screenplay in mind. It's not Dean Koontz or Stephen King; its a modern epic and I think that it excels at that and his style fits it perfectly.

that's not at all what I meant though. I'm talking about the syntax, the literary devices, the dialogue, the flow of ideas, his overall command of written language as a vehicle to tell a story. Not the length of the book or the style or the amount of detail or the lack of rape and shitting around every corner

LOTR is probably my all-time favorite book fwiw. There is no other book like it, and there is no other universe like Tolkien's.

redbreegull 01-10-2017 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poots (Post 4309589)
Next to Tolkien, Martin is a hack. He is so obviously attempting to copy Tolkien but just makes it more sleazy by throwing in all the rapes and incest and "surpise!" deaths just for cheap thrills. Also, his story is now so fucked up by the last two shitty books that I don't even care anymore. The HBO series is now better than his writing.

Martin is an obvious example, but there seems to be an enormous amount of fantasy literature which completely apes Tolkien, and adding a lot of bodily functions to his pristine Catholic mythos to make it more "serious" or something also seems to be very popular.

buzzard 01-10-2017 09:50 PM

Once we've established that Tolkien's mastery of the language exceeds that of Martin's, we've still got plenty of room for insinuations of literary mediocrity.

This discussion is being done wrong.

Run To Me 01-10-2017 11:35 PM

But really how much grey shit can you have in 1 weird book

redbreegull 01-10-2017 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poots (Post 4309618)
The fact that Tolkien doesn't follow usual literary conventions is one of the strengths of the book, in my opinion. As to his syntax/dialogue etc., I think it fits the story perfectly. It sounds old, which is the point and style that he is going for. It's a bit dry by modern standards, but it fits the story.

Having Frodo get Sam to suck him off in Mordor or the Fellowship get a bad case of dysentery from the shellfish at Lorien are details best left out of this story. I don't need to know how far Aragorn's cock was rammed up inside Arwen is or how Legolas is an intersex genderqueer.

dude I like his writing too and I understand his style is exactly what he is going for etc. etc. believe me I get it, I have read not just LOTR but all his works a bunch of times. I'm not saying any guy off the street could write as well.

I'm saying he's not comparable to Shakespeare. It's fine to love Bill Nye but he isn't Stephen Hawking, you know?

reprise85 01-11-2017 02:43 AM

I never read LOTR because I could barely get through The Hobbit. Just isn't my thing I guess. My imagination isn't good enough for it to feel magical, or something.

LaBelle 01-11-2017 06:15 AM

I could never finish reading The Return of the King, despite enjoying those books.

The last stretch of that book was a chore, legolas and gimli having pages and pages of bromance, and then one more fight in the shire. Didn't feel necessary at all.

FoolofaTook 01-11-2017 09:25 AM

If you guys want to read Tolkien at his best you should check out the start of the Silmarillion the Aiundale or whatever the fuck its called. That's some lofty prose right there yo.

Also I think The Children of Hurin is a swell tale. Hella tragic.

duovamp 01-11-2017 01:37 PM

This intrigues Gormadoc "Deepdelver" Brandybuck.

duovamp 01-11-2017 01:38 PM

Man I need to update my avatar now that Christmas is over.

FoolofaTook 01-11-2017 07:09 PM

I dunno the pale wintry night elf babes pretty cold yo

crabshack 01-12-2017 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duovamp (Post 4309681)
Man I need to update my avatar now that Christmas is over.

show.

don't tell.

haha your wife blah blah

wHATcOLOR 01-12-2017 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoolofaTook (Post 4309159)
Also ent doesn't mean shit. you motherfuckers are cheating. treebeard or quickbeam yes. ent no.


dude if we wanna be ents, we'll be ents!!! FUCK!!!!

LaBelle 01-12-2017 07:06 AM

Make ents great again.

redbreegull 01-12-2017 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoolofaTook (Post 4309159)
Also ent doesn't mean shit. you motherfuckers are cheating. treebeard or quickbeam yes. ent no.

everyone here is hardly even a huorn

FoolofaTook 01-12-2017 04:53 PM

Man the descriptions in the two towers of the huorns when they come down by helms deep are exceedingly eldritch

FoolofaTook 01-12-2017 04:55 PM

And what's with this gormadoc deepdelver shit? You gotta bring anal into my thread bro?

FoolofaTook 01-13-2017 10:07 AM

Gimli was my fav of the company. then i had the misfortune of beholding those peter jackson abominations in which proud gloins son was reduced to a buffoon.

the purity of my imaginative thought has been tarnished evermore. I wish I could set Peter Jacksons beard aflame.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Smashing Pumpkins, Alternative Music
& General Discussion Message Board and Forums
www.netphoria.org - Copyright © 1998-2020