I guess it's time I reveal
my score.
This is funny because I'm a lefty.
I feel uneasy pretty easily. My eyes legit start watering involuntarily if I see somebody has something hanging out of their nose.
Sometimes my feelings contradict my opinions. Like, if you were to ask me, I'd say "people should be more open talking about sex and parents should have healthy discussions about sex with their children and it shouldn't be seen as taboo etc etc." But actually I'm quite glad my parents never tried to talk to me about sex because ew. And I'm happy for what Laci Green does but I'm not going to sit through one of her videos explaining how to use a dental dam to facilitate safe anilingus. I'm pretty much Hank Hill. Or a shy debutante. I probably hesitate and lower the volume of my voice before saying words like "poop" or "sex."
Quote:
Originally Posted by redbreegull
(Post 4273560)
The monkey one was also hard for me... I clicked neutral because I felt like the test was measuring fear or disgust. My problem with eating a monkey is the intelligence and emotional complexity of the animal, not a rejection of weird food, but if I was starving I would probably eat the monkey so
|
Yeah, that one was hard for me, too. Like, when I watch one of those game shows where they have to eat worms or something, my response is just, "What's the big deal? Obviously they wouldn't feed this to the contestants if there was a realistic chance it could make them sick." I know a lot of people who wouldn't eat those lollipops with insects in them, but they seem harmless to me. I probably wouldn't have too hard a time adapting to foreign cuisines and unfamiliar meats so long as everything is prepared hygienically.
Only reason I said "no" to monkeys was their similarity to humans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teh b0lly!!1
(Post 4273525)
i wish somebody would mention me by name in their post and say i'd probably know something
|
Take this quiz to determine how ignored you feel. I think teh b0lly!!1 probably knows the name of the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yo soy el mejor
(Post 4273521)
51% conservative / 49% liberal
my brain is republican, it says
i guess
i said i was slightly disgusted by a person eating an apple with a fork. i meant disgusted by the person, not the act. i also would eat chocolate shaped like doodoo. it's only shaped like doodoo! and if i were hungry, i would totally eat my favorite soup that had been stirred with a used, but clean flyswatter
|
I didn't get the apple one. Like, it's just weird, not gross.
I usually eat apples with a knife because cutting it into bits is more comfortable than taking the whole thing to my face and getting some on my cheeks when I get mid-apple. But never a fork, how the fuck would one even do that.
I would have a problem with doo-doo chocolate (I don't want that image in my head when enjoying something brown; I don't even like that smiley doo-doo emoji I've been seeing lately) and the flyswatter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixnix
(Post 4273595)
"you see someone in a gimp suit brutalising a child"
|
Not sure if the gimp suit significantly affects the overall disgust score. I mean, the child rape variable kind of drowns out minor possible factors like that.
Maybe nose-picking would do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by duovamp
(Post 4273598)
Your brain is a Democrat
Conservative (20%)
Not sure how scientific this is.
|
According to the site:
Quote:
The study measured participants' brain response to "disgusting" imagery using an MRI. The study could predict party affiliation with up to 98% confidence. The questionaire on chartsme.com uses Jonathan Haidt's disgust scale in lieu of MRI and imagery, so results are likely far less accurate. Watch TED Talk to learn more or read "Yuck!: The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust".
|
It sounds like the original test was very reliable, but this one uses an inventory rather than images, so there's no way to know about this test specifically unless somebody validates it. It's possible that it has no predictive power, even though one would think it would if it measures the same variable the original test does. With the "reproducibility crisis" in psychology, researchers have found that some often-cited studies are difficult to reproduce, and only work when certain seemingly-arbitrary steps are followed.
I guess right-wingers being more motivated by disgust may explain policy positions like "sodomy" laws? A lot of the reasoning by social conservatives doesn't seem to be utilitarian ("this is bad because it will cause this undesirable outcome"), but just based on gut-reactions ("IT'S UNNATURAL AND GODLESS"). If they do try to use utilitarian arguments, they usually come in the form of "this is bad because it will lead to more unnatural and godless stuff," a slippery-slope argument that just pushes the justification back a step.
Haven't read it myself, but I think Martha Nussbaum wrote a book on the use of disgust in moral reasoning and why it's usually bad.