Every time some atheist prick tries to disprove the existence of god with
 

the argument like "if god really does love us why does he let bad things happen to goods people why huh" and its like man fuck you if you were an all powerful being who could simultaneously observe and communicate with all sentient life your idea of what constitutes good and bad would be fuckin RADICALLy different to the perspective of a single human whos primary concern is keeping themselves and those in their genetic branch based on some kind of genetic imperative that you probably created. That person might have prescribedd the rules your morality is based on butu expecting them to live by that is crazyh people talk

ok

Seems like a guy that smart and powerful would've developed a better way of communicating that perspective than complete and utter silence, right?

Don't be a prick now, you might offend some people

God made me a prick you sonofabitch.


An ugly, ugly prick... :(

EVERYONE'S OPINION IS EQUAL JUST SAYIN'

LDS challenge!!!

Post #666 ^^^

Yeah I'm not sure you're really refuting the argument here

I guess this is immature of me but I truly think the belief in the judeo-Christian god is just all kinds of dumb.

Shrug.

BUT WHO WAS PHONE

I love how angry deists get when someone has the nerve to not accept their beliefs. But then at the same time they think it's perfectly OK to tell other people that that their view of the world is completely bogus.

somehow "religious liberty" to deists means not having their views questioned, but having the right to question the views of others.

Babies starving to death is good from the perspective of maggots. Checkmate, Euls.

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like

I just find it funny how people give this argument like it's brand new and how the question of suffering and evil and everything else hadn't been debated since the birth of Christianity (and before, of course) and a set of Christian apologetics already established regarding it that people don't bother to seriously look into.

Last year I watched tons of 70's rapture movies and without exception in every single one of them there is a scene where the movie basically stops and they have long heart to heart discussion trying to explain this away and they fail to do it in every single time.

It always boils down to, if you have faith you won't ask questions, now go be a good person and stop thinking, thinking will leave you LEFT BEHIND. Pretty much 10-15 minutes of that in every film.

those people probably just deserved it

I read the comments of ADD afflicted 14-year-olds on YouTube to learn about atheism

No

Possibly

At this point in the thread if you don't believe in GOD you're a gay idiot.

How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?

you mean theists.

But seriously if nucular weapons has been used, then why didn't the world end?


after the silly blowjob nonsense Bill calls out the PC liberals... wait... I mean the other evil people...
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maher-tea...SSLql3BllviGds

Book of job

Most athiests dont know anything about theology. I certainly dont

It seems like SJ is saying that god cant possibly be omnipotent...if god is not, then it is not a god.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."

Atheists don't have to prove the non-existence of some hypothetical being; it's down to believers to show just some threads of proof that stand up to scrutiny.

you can have a god that is not omnipotent. All the Greek and Roman gods for instance.

Those were the best gods imo

i find atheism annoying. why not just be agnostic

wow what a great point scotty but those gods weren't defined as the omnipotent, omnipresent judeo-christian god though

i'm agnostic but i'm not preachy about it. whenever i get approached or given a church tract or something i just quietly say "no thanks; i'm not a believer, but i appreciate the thought." :smoke:

If you're going to make the argument that atheists are attributing a human morality to God, then you can't give any human qualities to God either. The argument of "whence commeth evil" is usually directed specifically at gods like the judeo-Christian god who are said to be very human like in their morality.

I would say it's my personal belief there is no god of any sort, but I'm agnostic about that belief as obviously there's no way to actually know.

the atheist/agnostic distinction is absolute horeshit. you can't prove that the 3000+ deities worshiped by humans aren't real so you're agnostic. well religious people can't prove shit, either, so they're agnostic too. EVERYONE'S AGNOSTIC.

grow some balls.

i'm an athiest because it makes total sense. spaghetti monsters, invisible pink unicorns, etc. I know that stuff is disrespectful and offensive but it's pretty on the money...agnostic to me is synonymous with "i don't want to pick a side" like "undecided voter" or "total wanker"

i don't act like a total asshole about people who have faith unless they are terrible racist homophobic misogynistic pieces of shit...and that has more to do with their shitty beliefs being grafted onto "infallible" religion

It's not really disrespectful or offensive so much as embarrassing and retarded

i'm agnostic because atheists like richard dawkins and even neil tyson step on this high and mighty soapbox which is really just political agenda and not much to do with science or being a decent human. being sure there is no god i think opens up the realm of it being totally okay to be a mass murderer, because you were born that way and morality seems to be less and less of an issue with dickbacks like dawkins who go around saying women deserved to be raped and to stop whining about things because it could be worse. i think it's more intelligent to say "i don't know shit". not knowing shit can also ******* not believing in god or the possibility of there being a god, because the idea seems pretty silly and is.

I feel like "agnostic" isn't a position but just a declaration of how certain you are about a position. The actual position is atheism.
And there are theists that claim to KNOW there is a God based on some sort of divine experience. And then there are atheists who claim to know there is no god based on being stupid. So the distinction is kinda necessary.