| MyOneAndOnly |
08-25-2014 04:08 PM |
as much as I find RBG's threads annoying, he was mostly correct with everything he said in that thread. You were dead wrong. And the best part of it is that the researcher that first suggested Gluten intolerance as a thing is the one who showed (in a follow up study) that it isn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bread Regal
(Post 4083187)
And saying non celiac gluten sensitivity doesn't exist is not an assertion you can truthfully make unless you're god. Furthermore, the study that redbreegull cites to support his idiotic opinion actually says that the reaction that people have foods containing gluten may actually be due other things that very commonly co-occur with gluten in nature. so even though their reaction may not be due to gluten specifically, eliminating gluten also happens to eliminate other things their bodies may be sensitive to.
you don't know their experience so what reason do you have to be a judgmental asshole about it?
|
if you read the study or even just the synopsis/overview by the researchers involved, you'd know that you're wrong. Per my previous post:
Quote:
CONCLUSIONS: In a placebo-controlled, cross-over rechallenge study, we found no evidence of specific or dose-dependent effects of gluten in patients with NCGS placed diets low in FODMAPs.
|
The issue here isn't someone interpreting the results of the last study. The real problem is that a lot of really shitty journalism (or lack thereof) repeated false claims regarding the first preliminary study by the SAME RESEARCHERS. But the way science works is that results need to be repeated and held up to peer review and scrutiny. Which happened here.
RBG Trolled you and you fell for it. |
