Hellooooooo it landed in the Indian Ocean and will never be recovered.

They don't know that for sure.

i didnt realise Obama flies drones around the world and kills people whenever he wants

that's because all the people who tried to warn you were killed

BY OBAMA-DRONES

what power

i mean he actually did do exactly that a couple times already

not that it's the explanation for everything obviously

but the precedent has been set, a sitting president has executed an american citizen without trial

a couple of times


or



flying drones around the world, killing people whenever he wants

yes

he rides around on them even though they're not made for that

http://i62.tinypic.com/xqm59g.png
its good to be the king

Obama is an all powerful overlord who oversees an unstoppable tech army that can kill or spy on anybody anywhere at anytime.

Except when he's incompetent and does nothing right and destroys everything.

"You are the poster child for an uninformed brainwashed American"

all i'm saying is that the concern is valid, the conspiracy is not

yep

sorry to make you re-check thread just for "yep"

So they programed the flight into the autopilot?

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking...lative-2014031

Malaysia opposition leader Anwar admits MH370 pilot is his relative

KUALA LUMPUR (THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK) - Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has admitted that Malaysia Airlines MH370 pilot Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah is related to his son's in-laws.

"I am not denying that he ( Zaharie) is related to one of my in-laws and that I have met him on several occasions.

"In fact, he is a close friend of (PKR supreme council member and Subang MP) R. Sivarasa, as we said before," Anwar told reporters at the Parliament lobby here on Tuesday.

Earlier, Anwar was quoted by South China Morning Post as saying: "I don't recollect the name (Zaharie), but when the photographs were shown, I remembered I had seen him at party meetings," he said.

He also said they had had no personal contact, but Capt Zaharie was a follower of his Twitter account.

On Sunday, his party Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) dismissed a British tabloid report which claimed Capt Zaharie is a "political fanatic".

PKR communications director Fahmi Fadzil said the Daily Mail report was "wild allegations" and the paper "is a sensationalist tabloid known for cooking up stories".

The tabloid claimed that Capt Zaharie commanded the doomed flight about several hours after he had attended Anwar's sodomy trial.

The Malaysian government is a corrupt mess. Supporting the opposition hardly makes a guy a "fanatic"

you underestimate how corrupt they really are and how heated it is between the two parties. i'm not saying that it's connected, i actually doubt it is. but remember how i said the plane disappeared a few hours after Anwar was sentenced? Maybe the co-pilot was working for someone else, but whoever it is, they're probably aware of the connection to Anwar and it may be why they were selected for the job. who knows.

also, Anwar and Najib Razak (current PM) used to be on the same team way back in the day and there is a lot of old backdoor networking within the government. The opposition party does hold various stronghold seats in parliament.

Policemen kill black American citizens almost every day sans trial.

When a black guy does it though...

Most of the info I've seen from all this supports a US military action with an AWACS plane. It's the only thing that can keep an Airbus of this size from civilian radar, yet still be detected by military radar. There's also the issue of the engines being equipped to be picked up by satellite which caught a signal from the engines some 7 hours after takeoff.


Hypothetically, say its the AWACS super secret job: You're Malaysia military and you see what's going on. What are you to do? You prolly tell the Chinese of the shenanigans and both countries now have to deal with the monstrosity of Disinfo being fed to the public by western media who are now claiming the Malaysians are lying to the world about what they know because of a fear of exposing vulnerable air defense.

Corruptness aside, the Malaysians are rolling with the big boys now and are just trying to deal.










:O

Wrong plane manufacturer.

if there's one thing that distinguishes conspiracy theorists from everyone else, it's failure to realise when they lack the domain knowledge to comment authoritatively on… well, just about everything really

hey omega, do you think dunning-kruger is a conspiracy?

it's be interesting to see how the percentage of conspiracy theorists with narcissistic personality disorder compares against the wider population

If they are perceiving personal things (like Billy Corgan hacking their computer), their pathologically narcissistic traits (e.g. delusions of grandeur) are probably under the umbrella of delusional disorder and not NPD. But I'm reasonably sure NPD is also elevated in that population.

TOC is obviously schizo

what are you, a fucking park ranger now?

No. That's reprise

I wouldn't say obviously. We can't judge any negative symptoms he may or may not have. Psychotic people, which I'm not sure TOC even is, aren't all schizophrenic. And schizophrenic's symptoms generally wax and wane, while his ideas seem very static and more ingrained in his actual personality.

So he might be schizophrenic, he might have delusional disorder, could have schizoptypal PD, could have nothing at all and just have some odd beliefs.

actually, scotty doesn't even know what schizo means so...

you mean the Airbus...that was a general term. I know its a Boeing with Rolls Royce engines equipped to be picked up by satellite which the engines of flight 370 never logged off from.


the initial news was it vanished from Radar, but then the Malaysian military said they were tracking it an hour after it went cold to civilian detection. Soon after that news hit the Pentagon stated they tracked it up to 5 hours after it went 'missing'.

The propaganda game was on full tilt and since then there's been fake pics, lame stories, bodgy interviews, the whole world's airforces looking for a plane. Now the profile of the pilot. First, his morals are brought into question, then we find he's a political Islamist, who left his wife a day before the disappearance. Now we see him in a T-shirt with "Democracy is dead" emblazoned across the front. blah, blah...


Look for a connection between the pilots and the two Iranian, the ones with the same legs in the released photos.

He sure made his point by silently dropping a plane in the ocean! Take THAT infidels.

Unless he took it through a portal back in time to make 9/11 happen on 9/10.

yo, johnny armchair psychologist, i'll believe anything if its true and i mentioned what i've seen supports a certain theory (which, btw, people around the world are postulating one way or the other on this event).


Supports it. It doesn't prove it, yet you leap to judgment that's what I believe. It's just analysis, really. Y'all freaking out from your own cognitive dissonance. As such you gotta frame me as someone to dismiss out of hand to not have to face whatever truth I do uncover that challenges your perceptions of reality.


I'd put you and the others in this thread with the ad-hominen attacks on me close to this category of wanne-be intellectuals progressive pussies, not to unlike Bolshevik scum:



Professor Calls For Climate Change ‘Deniers’ To Be Imprisoned


https://theconversation.com/is-misin...egligent-23111

don't know of it.



pertaining to this flight and where the plane may have went, here's ABC news playing catch up with a hint of damage control:



http://abcnews.go.com/news/t/blogEntry?id=22958304


yes. to extract Chinese defense secrets from those Freescale employees. Perfect spot for something like that.

dunning-kruger? never heard of it.

ANYWAY

kind of astonishing isn't it

i havent commented on your ideas about this plane crash or whatever. and of course, even broken clocks are right twice a day. this is something really weird that deserves observation, unlike corgan hacking your computer

im fine with challenging my perception of reality.

the trouble is that you don't seem to realise the level of expertise required to determine between 'almost certainly true' and every other possibility. i mean, seriously. what is it about your judgment, quantitatively, that makes it superior to almost everyone else's? what makes you qualified to comment authoritatively on the manifold scientific and foreign policy issues on which you hold forth here? how do you know?

you can point to this article or that article but that's not dealing with the question at a low enough level. you obviously see yourself as the 'free thinker' here, with the rest of us being blinkered sheep. what you don't seem to cognise is that most of us realise the limits of our understanding* – you apparently do not.




* that's not universal, obviously; some won't understand, but will keep quiet for the sake of preserving status.