yup, and reprise just told me to fuck off in a PM.


nice tolerance.



This issue is less about Phil Robertson and A & E than it is about freedom of speech and Christians who believe homosexuality is a sin and the GLAAD community that wishes to dispel that notion. I think that is a very interesting and provocative debate and one I haven't decided on one way or the other.

:censored:

i'm not tolerant of a comment like this.

freedom of speech doesnt mean you get no consequences for stating your terrible opinions

He also wants a return to the good old days of the Jim Crow era

ITT TOC's conspiracy walls come down and we find out what really drives him is prejudice against gay people

You're asking for TOLERANCE of your nasty fucking comment about "disease spreading gays"? Maybe you should contemplate joining a forum you'd feel more comfortable in.

http://www.godhatesfags.com/
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/
http://www.lds.org/?lang=eng

Seriously fucking pissed. You should go find banana. You both would have a shit ton to discuss.

TOC is gross.

quit bumping this thread people. or you'll have to answer to my dad

it's not really surprising that he has a problem with gay people and is subject to incredibly prejudiced views like all gay people are diseased, he hasn't made any attempt to hide his 1935 Nazi Germany-esque view of the Jews

Who gives a fuck about what people on tv believe in? I know tons of racists.

Why is television heralded as this great thing only when someone does something "bad" on it? OH MY GOD. A RACIST. On TELEVISION. Since when has TV been so sanctimonious?

It's like complaining about the hardest demon in Hell. What do you expect?

shocking

But you seemed to be of Starla's comment about 'back wooded right wing Christians'. I know they exist and are vile, so I posted the counterpart to that, because they exist too and are vile.


You show a bias to be tolerant of one and not the other. No biggie really, just pointing it out.

btw, I was right. A&E is going to reinstate Robertson on the show.

I don't believe gay people like you described exist in any large amount, maybe handfuls of individuals. There are millions of racist backwoods people

Race isn't really part of this story.


San Francisco alone has enough bath houses to make you flinch.


But you probably have the ratio basically correct, which is why it's confounding to many in the straight majority why the media is so focused on catering to a distinct minority.

can everyone stop responding to the omega concern

jesus

San Francisco alone has enough bath houses to make you flinch.

Merry Christmas Netphoria. This thread is my gift to you. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

racism is about ignorance xenophobia, not race

by all means, let's only focus on the majority of people. hope you still feel that way when white men aren't the majority anymore.

it's so hard because so many people really think like him

you're not nearly as interesting as you think you are

just fyi

Either the suits in New York really wanted to undermine the show at the expense of profits for their own political agenda, or this whole thing is a publicity stunt. If its the former, then the suits catered and caved to the GLAAD demands and misread the backlash to follow because they have an insulated view of the public that is brainwashed by the mainstream media's acquiescence to a minority which does not wish to engage the opposition in this case about the specifics of what is regarded as sin, only to silence them by force of political correctness.