Netphoria Message Board - Why doesn't America have a law like this?

Netphoria Message Board (http://forums.netphoria.org/index.php)

- General Chat Archive (http://forums.netphoria.org/forumdisplay.php?f=19)

- - Why doesn't America have a law like this? (http://forums.netphoria.org/showthread.php?t=177753)

Why doesn't America have a law like this?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...article568209/

Quote:

Canada's broadcasting regulator has received more than 3,000 responses from the public about its plan to change a regulation that prohibits the dissemination of false or misleading news, most of them passionately opposing the proposal.

The comments are posted on the website of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.

http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.c...truth10nw1.JPG
Here's an image for those philosophically adverse to "words" and such

Answer (highlight to read):
Because FREEDOM is the right to decide what is real and what is not. MURICA

Also, check out their comments section: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...8209/comments/

Quote:

energyblogwalter

8:14 PM on February 10, 2011

This has to go back to Parliament, it is clearly wrong and passing it is a mockery to what's left of our democracy.
8 replies
Report Abuse

Score: 96
Don't Care

8:17 PM on February 10, 2011

Just because a person can not be charged criminally for promoting false beliefs, I don't believe that should in any way prohibit the CRTC as regulator from revoking a broadcast licence for broadcasting false information. Not everyone is entitled to a broadcast license. The Zundel ruling seems like a red herring for those who want to remove these provisions. Maybe Mr. Lee and the rest of the committee members should be receiving some emails.
21 replies
Report Abuse

Score: 80
bardrow

8:10 PM on February 10, 2011

"And there are other legal processes to deal with falsity"

Sure there are other processes but those processes require the services of a lawyer.

How many shysters are sitting on that committee and why are they not subject to conflict of interest requirements?
4 replies
Report Abuse

Score: 62
Chris in Ottawa

8:12 PM on February 10, 2011

Well, Mr Lee you and your fellow committee members had batter come up with much better wording and find a way that prevents out and out lies and misrepresentation from being issued by "news" outlets such as Sun TV News. This issue has been quiescent for almost 15 years, why push it now? There has to be an inexpensive way to chase people who lie in the media and it should not be through the the usual Courts with the huge costs involved going that route. What seems to be wrong, frankly, was that the Charter allows lies and misrepresentation as freedom of expression - it is that problem that should be addressed and not abolishing the current sensible rule followed by the CRTC.
10 replies

Jesus Christ, these people adhere to a standard of capitalization and punctuation the likes of which I've never seen in a comment section! I don't even know what quiescent means! And not only do they follow aesthetically pleasing guidelines for constructing sentences, their arguments follow some modicum of a critical thought process! How dreadfully boring.

We are the dollars and cents?

The car is on fire, and there's no driver at the wheel?
And the sewers are all muddied with a thousand lonely suicides?
And a dark wind blows?
The government is corrupt?
And we're on so many drugs?
With the radio on and the curtains drawn?
We're trapped in the belly of this horrible machine?
And the machine is bleeding to death?

canadian comments sections are absolutely as big a cesspool as any other's dude, i don't know what point you're making here

i piss on this law by the way

i mean without knowing how its written but i'm feeling libertarian about the idea of the fucking government deciding what is "misleading" news and burying people

Governments should control the news but not the American government

i mean
maybe
i dont know. i'm too constantly confused
i dont think the canadian government should either
i mean i acknowledged how i'm being libertarian about this but yeah of course i'm equally uncomfortable with corporate news and i don't think especially any of these editorial programs should be on television channels as "news"
i mean even maddow or whatever i dont just want to get rid of hannity
i mean
i mean
i i i i
jesus christ

people should not be afraid of governmetn::: govement should be araid of their people - v

i just like free speech because i read that chamsky does

i think i dont like the state or corporations including all small business and farmer dickheads
maybe i should go further left into anarchy

This is a joke, right?

Yeah I love governments dictating what's correct reporting. That's totally not big brother.

i mean
i mean
i mean i was clearly against that if you read my posts
i just didn't like your post
it sucked
and i'm like not afraid to speak my mind
maybe that means you think i'm a bitch but i'm not a dog i just speak my mind

Oh I know you aren't in favor of this. I can call your post shit if you call mine.

that isn't true because everybody knows i'm the best poster in history

Even the '27 Yankees lost a few games.

i mean you know i'm for hit and run angry insults and all but just "is this a joke?"
i mean this is the POLITICS forum i mean, lets see some substance
lets see where you're really going with this
this doesnt need to be a sub-forum at all and if it is lets at least go somewhere with things
i'm always going somewhere
because i'm trying to be fucking CREATIVE here ubnlike in my FASCIST FUCK---HEAD HIGH SKKKOOL

SANDY KOAGFUX SHOULD BE OUT OF THE HALL OF FAME BECAUSE HE IS A FUCKING JEW

For profit news obviously presents huge conflicts of interest. That much is evident after watching BBC for about 60 seconds. Not really making any points here. It's just funny how the Canadians are all like "no no don't let the media lie to us that's insanity!" and over here in Murica we're so used to it that it's not even a topic of conversation.

I mean if you get your news exclusively from any of these sources you're a dumbass
http://corporatemediaexposed.com/wp-...centration.png

yeah youre not really that familiar with canada

half of it is as insanely redneck as everything and fucking even toronto basically made their own chris christie mayor
i mean yeah its slightly better but
its all just a world of countries where every citizen needs to be put down\

Quote:

Originally Posted by killtrocity (Post 3924547)

They misspelled Pittsburgh. :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by killtrocity

I mean if you get your news exclusively from any of these sources you're a dumbass

oooh this guy is edgy

i get my news from bbc and npr

does that make me misinformed

normally i would say no, but since that's coming from mr. reddit i'm going to have to reconsider my stance

i get my news from howard and robin

i get my news from :netphoria

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graveflower (Post 3924772)

normally i would say no, but since that's coming from mr. reddit i'm going to have to reconsider my stance

what do you think it would do to me if i was only informed by news sources from far left Libertarians™

i am on WND and planetprison my mind is free