LOL DAE REDDIT
 

Thanks for sharing

Gawker should know how Reddit works before blitzkrieging the site.

lol what? you're mad about them outing a child pornographer?

no guys it's ok because it's reddit

give me a break. guy deserves whatever comes to him. and the redditors trying to come to his rescue are fucking pathetic. lowest of the low.

what the fuck are you internet nerds talking about

Post forever

wonder when theyre gonna go after tvtropes

Woah woah woah, calm down. I'm nt upset about this but the article is completely wrong about Reddit - you have to go looking for that stuff it snt open in plain view.

I have probably visited Reddit 3-5 times in my life, fwiw.

no one said it was open and in plain view. he takes pictures of underage girls without them knowing and posts them and encourages others to do the same. doesn't matter if you have to type something into a search box to find it.

not sure what in the article was wrong about reddit. it didn't indict the entire site. just the gross parts and the people who defend them and think they're being noble.

The article made it seem like Reddit was heavily promoting this asshole's subreddit thing that you can only find if direct search. That's my only point.

...how so?

itt eulogy misunderstands the definition of child pornographer

exaggerating.

he's posting pictures of underage girls in order to satisfy erotic desires of perverts and encouraging others to do the same.

if you want to defend that, i guess that's your call.

this is like calling the CEO of google a music pirate because you can find rapidshare links with it

Been days since I read it, but how reddit works is far from how Chen portrays it.

Saying reddit is a pedophile website is like saying Netphoria is because duovamp posts here. Reddit has more users than most major cities. He's not "reddit's creepy uncle" he's a guy with a subreddit most users have never heard about or seen.

This argument's retarded; this guy seems like a colossal waste of semen.

and obviously I find it morally questionable, but it obviously isn't illegal. if doxxing is ok in this situation, it sets up a slippery slope.

i mean can't we get upset about r/beatingwomen or something instead?

No one has said that.

why not both

i don't get this

the guy is disgusting and ran a subreddit where people post pictures of underage girls taken surreptitiously/

i find homosexuality morally reprehensible, is it ok for me to post personal details about the moderators of an LGBT sub?

comparing sexual activity between consenting adults to taking pictures of underage girls and posting them without their knowledge

k guy

nice strawman you have there eulogy

how is it a straw man?

ok, not a straw man. but i'm comparing a legal activity that most people find morally wrong to a legal activity that some people find morally wrong. until you can convince me that morality isn't relative, I think we're done here

also i think this is not at all obvious