![]() |
Austin, TX, a case example of legal disenfranchisement
so i just found out that the 25th district in texas is being fought over by Wes Riddle, whereas the former rep, Lloyd Dogget, who voted against the Iraq war and generally pushes a progressive agenda has now been pushed entirely out of travis county.
this is the 2011 map that was struck down via the voter rights act. ![]() currently awaiting a verdict from the SCOTUS however, as a cautionary tale, the following was approved for the 2006 midterms after the 2001 redistricting was also struck down. that is a map of congressional districts 2006-2011. the center of the map, where "the pinwheel" has it's locus is central urban austin. i live on the right side of the map, in the yellow. actually maybe it's pink. that's the point, it's awful. this effectively dismantles the voting blocs of minorities in east and south austin from voting with liberal whites throughout the city, and completely disenfranchises the overall liberal attitude of the city in general. in fact because of demographic shifts, much of predominantly black east austin is now mixed with spoiled and apolitical white youth (also known as HIPSTERS) and many of the former black residents have moved north, into the 10th district. doggett won the yellow part there in 2006, as he had won the "fajita strip" district in 2004. however, the current redistricting (map #1), while struck down, is still in effect for the 2012 elections and won't be changed until the next cycle. and you wonder why i'm jaded. this happened despite the fact that i voted for democrats in the state house in 2000 and in 2010 when i went to the polls to vote for obama, and lloyd doggett. now i can't even vote for doggett, the only person i have ever voted for that actually won, because they effectively disenfranchised me. and everyone just goes IT'S UR FAWLT VOTIN MATERZ AMERIKA YAY EDIT: corrections made via eulogy |
i'm pretty sure travis county has carried a democratic president pretty much every year since ever. i know for a fact it was clinton x2, gore, kerry, obama. considering texas, like much of the south, used to be solid democrat we're stretching back to reconstruction when the republican party deliberately prevented democrats from voting in the south, but i'm not sure when "Travis County" became a political entity.
if you read about fajita strip districts, and recall democrat state reps fleeing to oklahoma to prevent a vote, and the ensuing fallout of that, it's a good example of how the republican party has been waging war on travis county every census cycle for at least 20 years and they finally won and there wasn't a damn thing anyone could do |
i mean other than make this shit stop but golly this is part of the process guys it wouldn't be sensible to rail against it lol
|
you're surprised by this?
where in Texas have you been for the last 20 years? |
it's surprising they weren't able to gerrymander the district a long time ago.
|
isn't this part of texas subject to section 5 of the voting rights act?
edit: yeah, all of texas is. are you sure this has been cleared by the justice department / DC district court? this seems to have been a different part of redistricting but i can't imagine the one you're talking about would turn out any differently: Quote:
the voting rights act is truly a wonderful thing (also it's something that conservative justices have been trying to chip away at... just sayin'). |
eulogy they're running for these seats right now, yes it's approved.
|
Quote:
most of you either think it's not happening or you're okay with it because "lol it's texas lol" god damn you fucking suck you're such an idiot |
Quote:
|
like where the fuck do you even get off writing off basic structural corruption and disenfranchisement as "i'm surprised they didn't do it earlier" as if democratic states aren't doing this to republican voters
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
if you do some research you'll find that they tried to make the districts even more egregiously ridiculous in 2000 and were prevented from doing so and the justice dept. intervened this time they didn't, because the 25th didn't go from east austin to mcallen so it was okay |
Quote:
i don't know what that means for this november though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
not sure why you want to fight me on it. |
Quote:
|
but again, i don't know what that means for november.
|
Quote:
|
i'd like to point out that the weird three pronged vortex on the map as drawn has been in effect since 2000, they've just made amends to make sure doggett is pushed out based on getting more seats. so i'm not sure why you're arguing that this is "fair" or "part of the process" because it's pretty obvious that these districts are engineered to produce republicans.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
and why do we need this anyway, why is redistricting a partisan event at the statehouse?
|
Quote:
|
i know you're going to get pissed off at me for saying this
but this is a perfect example of why we need democratic presidents to elect scotus justices. without section 5 of the voting rights act, they could do whatever the hell they wanted. |
well congrats eulogy you just defended corruption
well done, you win. everything's fair, isn't it? the court will fix it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
by telling you that the corrupt redistricting plan was struck down? what the fuck are you talking about? |
nothing to see here guys keep moving.
|
Quote:
|
again, why is redistricting a partisan event at the statehouse?
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Smashing Pumpkins, Alternative Music
& General Discussion Message Board and Forums
www.netphoria.org - Copyright © 1998-2020