No philosophy can stand up and be measured within the injustice of not just criminality, but especially those criminals (Lobbyist) who make their sinful doings legal under the law (repeal of Glass-Steagal).

The level of injustice is so beyond thick in this American Empire to get into egg-head esoteric philosophical debates is a waste of time.

but when in Rome...I do think some of you are on to something about revisionist history:



right...or how Liberals generalize how the Indians were pure and pristine human creatures forgetting the fact they killed each other over territories long before the white man came.


Here's the biggest history revisionism that needs to change TODAY!!!


In the real version of history, the robber barons won and established totalitarian rule. In the false version taught in the West the cabal monopolies and cartels were broken up by democratically elected governments.


If the truth of this history were exposed to the general public, it would probably take an entire generation before the truth of the robber barons to be understood.

i learned that in college but thanks for your idiot commentary

No comment on your K-12th brainwash?

um i think i've already stated that the education system serves as "indoctrination facilities" that teach curriculum as well as government compliance and nationalist sentiment

they could teach community but not when the culture is still me me me memememmemememmemememem

Then why didn't you notice you agreed with the statement? got hate?

I forgot who it was that said it, but they basically said that we would find it really weird if Walmart owned the whole country and made us salute the walmart logo every day at school, lined the classrooms and textbooks with images of great Walmart CEOs which we all had to learn about, etc...

it's the future bud!

But in years of shifting ideology what hasn't changed is your unseemly habit of clinging to rigid ideologies in the first place. That's always been your problem, and why it's hard to take you seriously (whether your on the right or, wow, now on the left). Not everyone identifies -- or, more to the point, even feels the need to identify -- with this or that political ideology, but you've been a dyed-in-the-wool radical for them all. And don't think this represents open-mindedness either, it just a capricious narrow-mindedness.

god if only it werent for super pacs :/

this thing really would be in the bag wouldnt it

What specifically do you mean by "rigid ideology"? What is the difference between consistency in worldview/ideology and rigidity? Moreover why is "rigid ideology" a negative, unless you mean something like "dogmatic ideology" which is perhaps more acceptable, although not automatically so, as something negative.

If by "rigid ideology" you mean "the right" or "the left", I'm pretty sure I explicitly said that I am not saying I am this or that, only that some ideas which are broadly ideologically "left" seem much more palatable to me. I'm not sure how you get this pathological character who runs back and forth from "rigid ideology" to "rigid ideology" as a means of finding identity from the statement which I made out my adoption of some left-wing premises. That seems to be entirely the opposite of what I wrote.

lol

I'm not the only crazy one:

http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/repu...ive_hypocrisy/

at this point glenn greenwald is too good for that site

its better than a republican doing it, real world and all that, etc etc

wait. you are saying that a philosophy cannot be "measured" (assessed?) within a system of either criminality or legality?

what?

look dude he's constantly complaining about how business is over-regulated and then in the same paragraph he bitches about the repeal of glass stegal so who fucking cares, just assume he's a troll and move on

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Glass-Steagal was one of the few things the government got right.

how dare you restrict the free market capitalist system

you're working for the satanic shadow government, obv

At least, that's what I'm assuming Omega is thinking, because it doesn't make much sense otherwise.

this is precious

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...no-way-in-hell

this is the new obamatard thread, expect lots of greenwald.

or not, you know, who's got the energy for this stuff anymore

Obama Nominates New FBI Head




He takes over for the guy who's been in there since the WEEK BEFORE 9/11/01. Nothing suspicious about that as I recall...uh-emmmm.


He's worked at a hedge-fund, has ties to Wall St...kind of stuff that makes real liberals curse the air when a Republican is choosing the leaders.

But Obama? free pass from the fake liberals.

You see who the criminals are trying to roll at us now for 2016 right?


Jeb and Hillary. LOL.


If these two are the nominees I will publicly chastise anyone who publicly supports either of them. Rolling those two out is just asking for civil war in this country.

if anything they're propping up christie, jeb still needs to wait. Or change his name.

I used to think that if Hill had won and done the same stuff all the libs that give Obama a pass would be like "omg, the devil, fucking clinton bullshit, blergh" and would be more vocal and less forgiving, and more successful at driving the Admin left/keeping them honest.

Im not really sure anymore.

Like I know we wouldnt have redbreegull blubbering through tears about how obamas latest speech burned all the sins away. But rbg'd probably still just sit there and take it from hilldog.