Netphoria Message Board

Netphoria Message Board (http://forums.netphoria.org/index.php)
-   Pumpkins Archive (http://forums.netphoria.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Whoa, seriously the best article about SP I've ever read (Boston Globe) (http://forums.netphoria.org/showthread.php?t=145491)

Nate the Grate 07-10-2007 05:51 PM

Whoa, seriously the best article about SP I've ever read (Boston Globe)
 
From the Boston Globe:
http://www.boston.com/ae/music/artic...t_immortality/

Another stab at immortality
Reformed Smashing Pumpkins bring back their epic sound

By Saul Austerlitz, Globe Correspondent | July 10, 2007

Once upon a time, in the mid-1990s, the hierarchy of alternative rock went as follows: Nirvana first and foremost, Pearl Jam second, and then, in bronze-medal position, Smashing Pumpkins. With Kurt Cobain's tragic suicide , and Pearl Jam attempting to divest itself of its fan base as rapidly as possible by avoiding the MTV star-making machine, it fell to lead singer Billy Corgan and his band to carry the mantle of rock saviors for a moment, bringing the post-punk, post-"Smells Like Teen Spirit" noise to an nation of grunge lovers.

With back-to-back blockbuster albums, 1993's "Siamese Dream" and 1995's double-disc "Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness," the Pumpkins, bred in the Chicago alternative scene but never entirely part of its hipper-than-thou aesthetic, ascended to the rank of idols. Rolling Stone covers and Video Music Awards lay strewn in their path, and a place in the pantheon of alternative-rock elders, the successors to U2 and R.E.M., seemed a foregone conclusion.

But the 1996 death of touring keyboardist Jonathan Melvoin, and the lackluster sales of post-"Mellon Collie" albums, intensified already-simmering tensions between Corgan and his bandmates, causing the band to break up in 2000. Corgan briefly formed a new group, power-poppers Zwan , and released an electronica-influenced solo record before reuniting with Pumpkins drummer Jimmy Chamberlin and bringing back the Smashing Pumpkins name for a new album, "Zeitgeist," out today. The question is: Does anyone still care?

The Smashing Pumpkins went from rock titans to has-beens, the forgotten stars of alternative rock's heyday. The generations of bands that followed them were more influenced by the Pumpkins' colleagues, bands like Nirvana, Alice in Chains, and Weezer, than the Pumpkins themselves, and as a result, the Pumpkins ' sound has been, to a degree, edited out of 1990s alternative-rock history. Where peers like Pearl Jam and Stone Temple Pilots have maintained a steady presence on radio stations, and the glow that often sticks to former giants, Smashing Pumpkins have suffered a dizzying downturn in their reputation since the glory days of "Mellon Collie." The band that once could release "The Aeroplane Flies High," a five-CD boxed set of B-sides and outtakes, to breathless anticipation must now hope that fans still remember hits like "1979" and "Tonight, Tonight" with some fondness.

So what happened to the Pumpkins?

In essence, the gulf that always separated the band from its alt-rock cohorts has only widened with the passage of time. While Smashing Pumpkins were part and parcel of the grunge era, they were never entirely rooted in the sound that Nirvana broke. Corgan was a studio-rat control freak, whom rumors naggingly insisted re-recorded the parts played by all three of his bandmates. Corgan's musical taste buds were formed by arena rock just as much as its more avant-garde successors, and there were times when his work bore more of a resemblance to that of paragons of 1970s bloat like Electric Light Orchestra or Boston than to 1980s icons of leanness, like the Minutemen or Hüsker Dü.

Smashing Pumpkins unabashedly embraced the grandiose -- epic guitar solos, sweeping string sections, and lengthy albums. Combined with Corgan's taste for wounded-romantic lyrics, the Pumpkins were the ideal soundtrack for melancholy youth lugging around their own infinite sadnesses. But today, the band's Gothic romanticism is a poor fit for the indie/alternative scene it helped form, too earnest for hipsters and too wimpy for classic rock, which has embraced the likes of Nirvana and Pearl Jam. At a moment when hip new bands pay homage to the stripped-down post-punk era instead of overblown 1970s metal, Smashing Pumpkins' taste for pre-punk pomposity is a cultural faux pas. Where Nirvana and its grunge compadres are seen as essential to the movement from punk to post-punk to today's indie boom, Smashing Pumpkins, given their roots in arena rock, have grown peripheral to musical discourse. Their return comes too late to capitalize on many of their original fans, and too early to hop on the sure-to-soon-arrive grunge-revival bandwagon.

The waning interest is both understandable and unfortunate, for Smashing Pumpkins were the torch carriers for a monumental bombast American pop culture has grown too drenched in irony and cynicism to tolerate. "Zeitgeist" is a return to the harder-edged Pumpkins sound, its booming drums and echo-chamber guitar hooks placing the emphasis on the band's roots in Black Sabbath and the New Romantics. Emerging at a moment when groups prefer to find inspiration in Joy Division (like Interpol, see CD review on E1) or Gang of Four (Bloc Party) or electric blues (the White Stripes), this taste for arena-filling, crowd-pleasing, easy-on-the-ears sounds is, strangely , an artistically and commercially unpopular choice. Smashing Pumpkins have become representatives of Clinton-era simplicity and straightforwardness, their gigantism and lack of irony shortcomings when sharing the cultural stage with Flight of the Conchords and Modest Mouse. In an era when concision and self-deprecation are favored , it is difficult to believe that a band so sprawling, and so nakedly ambitious, could have been as enormously popular as they once were. A double-disc, 28-track album with an opening instrumental overture suitable for weddings and graduation ceremonies? Fans are unlikely to hit up iTunes for that sort of thing in 2007.

The backlash began during the years of the Pumpkins' greatest successes. Corgan's unabashed desire to be the biggest rock star in the world, to write the songs that the whole world would sing, as he often stated in interviews, cast him as the LBJ to Cobain's JFK -- the callow, power-hungry successor to the noble dead prince. Corgan's songs inflated his emotionally turbulent psyche to galactic proportions ("In my mind I'm everyone," he sings on "Porcelina of the Vast Oceans," off "Mellon Collie"), with the resulting work by turns anguished, desperately romantic, and bitterly angry. Corgan's songwriting skills were always underrated; he was never quite as elegant with the haunting quip as Cobain was. These qualities made Corgan a target for cooler-than-thou hipsters like Pavement's Stephen Malkmus, who famously called the band out in song: "Out on tour with the Smashing Pumpkins, nature kids, they don't have no function, I don't understand what they mean, and I could really give a [expletive]."

Smashing Pumpkins ' songs never felt like the secret initiation to an exclusive club the way that Nirvana's did. What they did was compress outsize emotion into bite-size servings, using power-pop, sugary hard rock, and Black Sabbath, mid-'70s-era metal as platforms for Corgan's passive-aggressive melancholia. Corgan may not have been a brilliant lyricist, but his knack for pop hooks -- for producing songs like "Bullet with Butterfly Wings" and "Disarm" that sank their hooks into alternative radio and MTV and would not let go -- was positively uncanny.

As a band unashamed of grandiosity or naked romanticism, Smashing Pumpkins received the same beating from critics and naysayers any group that aims for the stars does, for overreaching, and for silliness. But at its brightest moments, it defined a type of surging, epic swoop that none of its descendants have been able to match. "Zeitgeist" (the title is meant to be pronounced with fingers crossed, presumably) is an attempt to remind fans of what has been absent, during the band's hiatus, from the world of rock.

The album is also an attempt to erase the band's less impressive later incarnations, and return to its sweet spot -- the "Siamese Dream"/"Mellon Collie" era. Where Smashing Pumpkins once sought to blend dark with light, hard with soft, "Zeitgeist" mostly confines itself to the group's metalloid configuration -- perhaps a function of the absence of original bassist, and confirmed softie, James Iha. Even synth-heavy tracks like "For God and Country" still center on Chamberlin's furious, controlled drumming. "Zeitgeist" offers the Pumpkins' classic sound, but only one element of it -- "Bullet With Butterfly Wings," but not "Tonight, Tonight."

"Zeitgeist" definers no longer, Smashing Pumpkins have retreated into popular culture's blind spot. Once upon a time, though, in a long-ago, half-remembered era, they were firmly in the driver's seat, and their combination of hard and soft, precise and grand, bloat and magnificence reigned supreme. Their time will soon return.

bja1288 07-10-2007 05:57 PM

"confirmed softie, James Iha"
quality jab

br191804 07-10-2007 06:03 PM

I saw that article in the Globe. Pretty Good.

Teej212 07-10-2007 06:05 PM

they will return to the driver's seat woohoo!

apetulantfrenzy 07-10-2007 06:05 PM

Quote:

Smashing Pumpkins have become representatives of Clinton-era simplicity and straightforwardness, their gigantism and lack of irony shortcomings when sharing the cultural stage with Flight of the Conchords and Modest Mouse.
Yeah, irony sucks.

Gossamer 07-10-2007 06:17 PM

Loved it.

The Omega Concern 07-10-2007 06:20 PM

this guy threw in a Clinton comparison.

grade: F.

ratking17 07-10-2007 06:22 PM

outstanding piece on the state of music right now....rock on...

hnibos 07-10-2007 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern
this guy threw in a Clinton comparison.

grade: F.

didnt like the james iha jab?

Crystal_Chrome 07-10-2007 06:25 PM

Back on track baby! Nice article.

Nate the Grate 07-10-2007 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Omega Concern
this guy threw in a Clinton comparison.

grade: F.

He didn't compare him to Clinton, you fucking idiot. "Clinton-era". Not Clinton. Do you understand the difference?

Unless you don't believe in art reflecting the "spirit of the times" (lol...zeitgeist!).

fatbrianwilson 07-10-2007 06:36 PM

"perhaps a function of the absence of original bassist... James Iha."

Virex Kills 07-10-2007 06:39 PM

Perhaps I misunderstood some of the article, but it sounded to me like he is saying that SP wont have much to contribute to this new era. Or at least thats the vibe I get from the beginning part.
Looking at Live Earth I was struck by just HOW different SP is. Granted, there were no acts from the "hip" scene, but SP really stood out as having something powerful and grand to offer.

Heat6Jones 07-10-2007 06:40 PM

Billy Corgan did not have sexual relations with Linda Strawberry!

bja1288 07-10-2007 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatbrianwilson
"perhaps a function of the absence of original bassist... James Iha."

original bassist (Darcy), and softie Iha (proud creator of the abomination "Let It Come Down")
learn english plz

firewoman 07-10-2007 06:41 PM

that was a beautiful article. I don't agree with Billy not being a brilliant lyricist, but everything else was superbly written. thanks for sharing Nate!

skipgo 07-10-2007 06:50 PM

it's okay i guess, but it calls james the bassist, and claims billy re-recorded parts by "all three members". Yeah, that's billy on those drums. woo hoo!

i can't even tell if this guy's laughing at them or praising them. he should be less wordy and find a direction already. What can i say, i hate journalists.

(but thanks for posting it, it was still pretty interesting in some parts)

nanowerx 07-10-2007 06:52 PM

Wow, I am impressed. That was not biased in any way, was informative, and entertaining to read.

""Zeitgeist" offers the Pumpkins' classic sound, but only one element of it -- "Bullet With Butterfly Wings," but not "Tonight, Tonight.""

Best line in the article. I think it is also the best way ive heard yet that describes Zeitgeist

Nate the Grate 07-10-2007 06:57 PM

He doesn't say James was the bassist. He says the bassist, and James Iha. Re-read, people!

The Omega Concern 07-10-2007 07:03 PM

Quote:

originally posted by Nate the Grate:

He didn't compare him to Clinton, you fucking idiot. "Clinton-era". Not Clinton. Do you understand the difference?

Unless you don't believe in art reflecting the "spirit of the times" (lol...zeitgeist!).
dude. fucking relax. it's still a Clinton comparison and I find this entire article reaching for a definition that only exist in this guy's mind as he's trying to figure out the era's as he's writing.

Quote:

In an era when concision and self-deprecation are favored...
ahhh, but if he's right here with this comment about the times today...no wonder the scene is so boring.

MrEcks 07-10-2007 07:06 PM

I always feel good after reading something written by a journalist who obviously knows what the hell he's talking about. The fact that there was no mention of "Swan" in this article is fantastic.

Nate the Grate 07-10-2007 07:07 PM

Yeah well...stop posting on the politics board!

skipgo 07-10-2007 07:07 PM

yeah, that's probably true, but he should have written that bit a little more clearly. WE know that James isn't the bassist, but people who read this who don't know, probably will think that's what he was saying. I know, it's nitpicking. I really have just gotten fed up with journalists lately, sorry.

Ever 07-10-2007 07:09 PM

You're right, nate. It was a good essay.

br191804 07-10-2007 07:12 PM

The music scene in Boston is huge and for the Globe to be positive about the pumpkins, I think this speaks volumes.

br191804 07-10-2007 07:12 PM

The Boston Globe can be very critical at times.

theghostchild 07-10-2007 07:12 PM

nice article..

EllisAshbrook 07-10-2007 07:15 PM

All i can say is that this dude is a true journalist in the modern sense of the word. Seems like he probably knows nothing of the band, but his interns were able to dig up enough half truths and out of context lyrical quotes to come up with a unique "angle".

I like the story he tried to write, but he could have used a fact checker. These days, there is very little excuse for this kind of crap other than sheer laziness.

It's so funny how they get compared to pearl jam and nirvana. SO lame. As soon as somebody does that, it's a good signal that you should tune them out. :smoke:

br191804 07-10-2007 07:17 PM

Nate the Grate, I wish Cam Neely was walking through that Garden door. Man, I miss him

fatbrianwilson 07-10-2007 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bja1288
original bassist (Darcy), and softie Iha (proud creator of the abomination "Let It Come Down")
learn english plz

you'd have a point if it read that way, but it doesn't. It indicates that the author is under the impression that James was the bassist, which is discrediting to the entire article.

learn grammar plz

avian chaos 07-10-2007 07:20 PM

I can't believe a board full of a bunch of shitty diaper babies whining about every single "bad" review that comes out isn't balls-out ecstatic over this very nice article.

skipgo 07-10-2007 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EllisAshbrook
It's so funny how they get compared to pearl jam and nirvana. SO lame. As soon as somebody does that, it's a good signal that you should tune them out. :smoke:

Although i pretty much agree with your post, and I agree with this quoted statement to some degree, you have to admit it's not that unusual to hear SP being lumped in with those bands. They were all three huge at the same time, they had a big hand in defining the sound of the early to mid 90's. They were nothing alike, different in so many ways, and yet it does make sense to group them together, simply because they all share the distinction of being the bands that brought "alternative music" to the masses.

br191804 07-10-2007 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by avian chaos
I can't believe a board full of a bunch of shitty diaper babies whining about every single "bad" review that comes out isn't balls-out ecstatic over this very nice article.

That seems to be the norm about most netphorians. Let's dwell on the negative and not give a shit about the positives. There are a lot of Debbie Downers on this board. :noway:

pete 07-10-2007 07:46 PM

good article, although the last few words are slightly unbelievable...the thought of Corgan becoming once again the biggest rock star in the world is almost laughable.

pale blue eyes 07-10-2007 07:54 PM

I thought it was a pretty good article and well-written. And I agree about lumping them in with Pearl Jam and Nirvana, they are not really grouping then together because they are similar but because they were all iconic bands of the 1990s. Even if you did not like them, you knew who they were.

The Omega Concern 07-10-2007 07:58 PM

Quote:

originally posted by Nate the Grate:

Yeah well...stop posting on the politics board!
:p

and Ever is correct, it is a decent essay. He rated the Pumpkins 3rd behind PJ and Nirvana when the Pumpkins established themselves apart from them as well as Alice In Chains and Soundgarden.

one could wordsmith their way to a conclusion about the Pumpkins apart from those Seattle bands, but johnny Boston Globe here doesn't have that scope on his lens. He regurgitates some tired cliche's, but Im sure his Journo Prof would be proud.

schwarzy 07-10-2007 08:02 PM

the Smashing Pumpkins have always been the most not-understood band of the world. Even in their successful years.

commando 07-10-2007 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nate the Grate
He doesn't say James was the bassist. He says the bassist, and James Iha. Re-read, people!

We CAN read. That's why when those among us who are literate read, "perhaps a function of the absence of original bassist, and confirmed softie, James Iha," we thought "Wow. A parenthetical comma clause. This douche thinks James played bass."

YOU learn to read, fuck face.

TuralyonW3 07-10-2007 08:10 PM

good article

The Omega Concern 07-10-2007 08:11 PM

Quote:

Their return comes too late to capitalize on many of their original fans, and too early to hop on the sure-to-soon-arrive grunge-revival bandwagon.
Nirvana's comeback? ummm

PJ never really stopped.

AIC is rocking again. Dave Grohl has done rather well with Foo Fighters the last decade.

and didn't the Pixies mail in a whole tour recently?

I suppose this 'sure too-soon' grunge revival officially begins when Candlebox cranks it up again?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Smashing Pumpkins, Alternative Music
& General Discussion Message Board and Forums
www.netphoria.org - Copyright © 1998-2020