View Full Version : Bush administration deleting and altering files on gender issues


BlueStar
05-02-2004, 01:29 PM
U.S. Deletes, Alters Gender Issue Web Data

By Deborah Zabarenko

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration has stripped information on a range of women's issues from government Web sites, apparently in pursuit of a political agenda, researchers reported on Wednesday.

"Vital information is being deleted, buried, distorted and has otherwise gone missing from government Web sites and publications," Linda Basch, president of the National Council for Research on Women, said in a telephone interview.

"Taken cumulatively, this has an enormously negative effect on women and girls."

A council report said the missing information fell into four categories: women's health; their economic status; objective scientific data; and information aimed at protecting women and girls and helping them advance.

The deletions and alterations appear to hew to a political agenda, rather than providing the nonpartisan, unbiased data that has been the tradition of U.S. government reports, the council said.

Its report cited a fact sheet from the Centers of Disease Control that focused on the advantages of using condoms to prevent sexually transmitted disease; it was revised in December 2002 to say evidence on condoms' effectiveness in curbing these diseases was inconclusive.

The National Cancer Institute's Web site was changed in 2002 to say studies linking abortion and breast cancer were inconsistent; after an outcry from scientists, the institute later amended that to say abortion is not associated with increased breast cancer risk.

25 PUBLICATIONS DELETED

At the Labor Department's Women's Bureau Web site, the report said 25 key publications on subjects ranging from pay equity to child care to issues relating to black and Latina women and women business owners had been deleted with no explanation.

Key government offices dedicated to addressing the needs of women have been disbanded, according to the report. These ******* the Office of Women's Initiatives and Outreach in the White House and the President's Interagency Council on Women.

At the Pentagon, the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services was slated to be dismantled but was saved after an outcry. However, the report said this committee now focused on issues such as health care for servicewomen and the effects of deployment on families, but not on equity and access issues.

In the area of scientific objectivity, the report said two advisory committees recommended the Food and Drug Administration approve a contraceptive known as Plan B as a nonprescription drug but were blocked by political pressure from doing so.

Regarding violence against women, the report said the U.S. attorney general, as of March 2004, had failed to conduct and publish a study required under the 2000 Violence Against Women Act to investigate discrimination against domestic violence victims in getting insurance.

The White House did not immediately return a call for comment.

sppunk
05-02-2004, 02:32 PM
I wouldn't put much stock in what Reuters reports, especially when it's political.

BlueStar
05-02-2004, 03:26 PM
Originally posted by sppunk
I wouldn't put much stock in what Reuters reports, especially when it's political.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if it was all completely true. And a lot of the things cited in the article aren't new things that no one knows about. The Bush administration has been horrible when it comes to gender issues. I still have the lovely form letter mailed to me by the Office of the First Lady in response to my e-mail about Bush ending the Office of Women's Initiatives. Political pressure goes a long way. And when it comes to women's issues, the Bush administration most definitely has a political agenda.

DeviousJ
05-02-2004, 04:14 PM
Originally posted by sppunk
I wouldn't put much stock in what Reuters reports, especially when it's political.

What's wrong with Reuters?

sppunk
05-02-2004, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by DeviousJ


What's wrong with Reuters?

Nothing is wrong with them really. But they often have political stories that turn out to be, if nothing else, flat out misleading. Internationally, Reuters is great. Within the U.S., Reuters struggles to get an upper hand on the Associated Press, often forcing them to run stories without all the facts.

Boner
05-02-2004, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by sppunk


Nothing is wrong with them really. But they often have political stories that turn out to be, if nothing else, flat out misleading. Internationally, Reuters is great. Within the U.S., Reuters struggles to get an upper hand on the Associated Press, often forcing them to run stories without all the facts.

Please shut the hell up.

sppunk
05-02-2004, 07:49 PM
Originally posted by The Ace of Aces


Please shut the hell up.

It's too true. Internationally, Reuters kicks major ass though. I like their style a lot more than AP and would love to use them. But, inside the U.S. (and outisde of sports), they really spare me to death.

jczeroman
05-03-2004, 09:34 AM
In a show of solidarity for the president and against terrorism, I have stricken all of the posts by women from this forum!