View Full Version : Zero with a bass solo

12-01-2014, 03:27 PM
Watch from 1:20. :rofl:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

12-01-2014, 03:29 PM
Well, at least their drummer is better than Mikey.

12-01-2014, 03:39 PM
He really fucks up the second riff but nails the nasal

The exploding boy
12-01-2014, 04:32 PM
This is whats the worst about it. that he tries to do the voice.... Also how they mess up timing later on the singing is not where it should anymore.

This is a terribly out of place and awful bass "solo" (its not that much a solo for one). Also he's clearly very out of tune. You hear it in earlier bits and its even more obvious in that bit.This is the kind of shit someone might do when they're young cause they think it'll be cool. Then later they learn where solos go and don't go. In fact, they might learn most songs really don't call for a bass solo...ever.

And the drummer does pretty much none of the cool bits. I'm not aware of how supposedly bad Byrne was but i doubt he was worse than this.

Anyway, this is all moot because they're a young band and young bands, especially doing covers, don't need to be picked apart like this. Of course it's not perfect.

12-01-2014, 05:54 PM
The arrangement is really fucked up

I couldn't even hear the bass, really

Butt Pope
12-01-2014, 09:12 PM
Thanks for posting my bands video.

12-01-2014, 09:14 PM
nothing like a cocoa beach rock band

12-01-2014, 09:15 PM
So is this what Carl Grimes did before the apocalypse?

12-01-2014, 09:24 PM
~~~Cocoa Beach~~~


12-01-2014, 09:35 PM
The clothing is probably the most embarrassing part. Shorts and those tall white socks? Cmon man

And then blue jeans

12-01-2014, 09:40 PM
That's how kids dress these days

High socks are all the rage

12-01-2014, 10:03 PM
Pretty sure that's a good way to guarantee never getting laid ever along with playing Smashing Pumpkins covers

12-01-2014, 10:22 PM
They're 13 yrs old. You're all picking on kids who don't even have pubic hair.

Mals Marola
12-01-2014, 11:49 PM
yeah pretty sure the first thing i thought of when seeing the snap of this video wasn't "let me make a critical assessment of their fashion choices"

The exploding boy
12-01-2014, 11:52 PM
They're 13 yrs old. You're all picking on kids who don't even have pubic hair.

these guys aren't 13. more like 17/18. Not that it make a difference essentially