is for dipshits?

socialism is for dipshits

1-800-NERD-PENCILS

on netphoria a thread like this could become a sincere discussion about socialism

but yeah, b)

Is it that time again?

nah

nein

not as bad as most people think it is.

prolly not as good as I think it is, too.

libertarian socialism is better.

probably the best -ism.

aside from my jism.

In 100 years the United States is going to have gone all Fabian and all right wing idiots are going to be predictably proven wrong.

^ this

i don't have a problem with it. i'm weak, lazy and stupid so it's supposed to help me i think.

It's supposed to, but theory /= practice.

libertarian socialism is better.

^ i'm with you

So Nimrod, where on planet Earth would you assert that real scientific socialism has been tried?

what on earth is libertarian socialism

So Nimrod, where on planet Earth would you assert that real scientific socialism has been tried?

shut up

So Nimrod, where on planet Earth would you assert that real scientific socialism has been tried?

Your high school history class hasn't gotten that far yet, douche.

I feel the need to post in this thread.

SWEDEN YOU FUCK

god i hate it when people try to trap nimrod in pathetic attempts at gotcha moments

leave the nimrod trolling to the professionals please

and yes i get paid to be here, it's for a university research project

SLOW DOWN GANDHI YOU'RE KILLING EM!!

gandhi?

SWEDEN YOU FUCK

yeah, Sweden is truly Marx's vision come to life

so you're talking marxism/communism because i think it gets too goddamn confusing when you start calling communism/marxism socialism

so please do shut up

so you're talking marxism/communism because i think it gets too goddamn confusing when you start calling communism/marxism socialism

so please do shut up

I said SCIENTIFIC socialism.

that's not a phrase I've ever used or seen

at least not lately, it's probably somewhere in my notes for political philosophies or something

trot you debating with a retard , it's like playing kickball witha kid in a wheelchair

I know I do it with you a lot too.

trots, you're getting advice from a gimp, it's like getting advice from mojojo on netphoria.

I'd be okay with instituting some form of socialism, assuming it's optimal for productivity.

Scientific socialism? You mean a nihilistic form of communism?

Because I've never in my life - with living in Russia and majoring in Russian history - never heard that bullshit term.

Do we live in a scientific republic?

that's because redbreegull just made it up in his shit brain.

i want redbull to explain scientific socialism.

you guys are doing it wrong

oh so i wasn't just rusty "scientific socialism" is utter tripe.

wunderbar

if sppunk had never lived in russia, we would never have been completely sure.

NO PUBLIUS CLODIUS IT IS NOT A JOKE

LIBERTARIAN MEANS LIBERAL ECONOMICS AND NO STATE
SOCIALISM MEANS CONSERVATIVE ECONOMY AND BIG STATE

THEREFORE

WTF IS LIBERTARIAN SOCIALISM

Actually you are all completely wrong. Scientific socialism is socialism as defined by Marx vs. utopian socialism which predated him. Scientific socialism = Marxism. It's just another word for dialectical materialism. Seriously, kiss my ass you fuck heads, you talk to me like I'm a fucking retard when I fucking am correct and you are wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_socialism
Suck my dick you fucking retards. Read a goddamn book.

just call it marxism

it's what everyone else on the FUCKING PLANET is familiar with and there's nothing confusing when you use the word

Scientific Socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_socialism)
Suck my dick you fucking retards. Read a goddamn book.

Well technically this is just scientifically sound socialism, it's not like you could say "Scientific Socialism is the most pure form of socialism" or something, which is the definition it seems like you were trying to grasp. I mean I could say "scientific Existentialism" or "scientific Capitalism" too but it doesn't make it a real term. I thought "Scientific Socialism" the way you described it was something real, not just socialism with the adjective scientific in front of it.

THREAD FAILURE

REBOOT

Well technically this is just scientifically sound socialism, it's not like you could say "Scientific Socialism is the most pure form of socialism" or something, which is the definition it seems like you were trying to grasp. I mean I could say "scientific Existentialism" or "scientific Capitalism" too but it doesn't make it a real term. I thought "Scientific Socialism" the way you described it was something real, not just socialism with the adjective scientific in front of it.

It is actually completely different from utopian socialism, and the differences between Marx and earlier socialists is absolutely noteworthy. It is the "purest" form of socialism in the sense that when we think of socialism today, we generally think of Marx's socialism and the various ways it got watered down and fucked up in the 20th century. I didn't say Marxism because I assumed that people having an argument about socialism knew enough about it to recognize the name of one of it's two major branches.

socialism is for dipshits

i know about marxism, leninism, and utopian communism/socialism so YES I KNOW ABOUT THE MAJOR BRANCHES I DIDN'T EVER SEE THE POINT OF SAYING SCIENTIFIC SOCIALISM UNLESS I WAS WRITING A PAPER ABOUT IT AND I DIDN'T BECAUSE I'M FAR MORE INTERESTED IN THE REVOLUTION THAN THE PHILOSOPHY YOU FUCKING CUNTSTAIN

jesus christ the faggot hasn't even graduated college yet and hasn't realized that most of this shit gets compressed into one huge block and you barely remember a lot of the BULLSHIT ASS DETAILS YOU USED TO BE SO PROUD OF KNOWING WHEN YOU WERE A FUCKING DICKHEAD FRESHMAN GOD SHUT UP YOU FAGGOT

Well he is pretending that there is such thing as a term "Scientific Socialism" with the definition of being a purest form of socialism. I think he just wanted to use the word textbook instead of scientific, and is now in a hole. Scientific is really just any old qualifier, it isn't part of a whole, like he wants.

jesus christ the faggot hasn't even graduated college yet and hasn't realized that most of this shit gets compressed into one huge block and you barely remember a lot of the BULLSHIT ASS DETAILS YOU USED TO BE SO PROUD OF KNOWING WHEN YOU WERE A FUCKING DICKHEAD FRESHMAN GOD SHUT UP YOU FAGGOT

Regain composure, you're embarrassing yourself.

no i'm not i'm amusing myself and hopefully others

you have much to learn since you don't know dick about the people's will huh bitch, how you like that. how about the decemberists, no not the band you twaddling nonce.

socialism is for dipshits

:banging:
:banging:
:banging:
:banging:
:banging:
:banging:
:banging:
:banging:

Well he is pretending that there is such thing as a term "Scientific Socialism" with the definition of being a purest form of socialism. I think he just wanted to use the word textbook instead of scientific, and is now in a hole. Scientific is really just any old qualifier, it isn't part of a whole, like he wants.

I have no idea what you are talking about. There are TWO MAJOR STREAMS OF THOUGHT IN SOCIALISM. UTOPIAN AND SCIENTIFIC. SCIENTIFIC WAS DEVELOPED BY MARX. IT IS ALSO KNOWN AS MARXISM, COMMUNISM, FULL COMMUNISM, DIALECTICAL MATERIALSIM, OR HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. IT IS A REAL TERM.

*adjusts scholar hat* Well, for my Poli. Sci. minor nobody ever used the term "scientific socialism" and for my Philosophy minor, nobody ever used the term "scientific socialism" when we read Marx.

I kind of wish education at the college level weren't privatized though...

I have no idea what you are talking about. There are TWO MAJOR STREAMS OF THOUGHT IN SOCIALISM. UTOPIAN AND SCIENTIFIC. SCIENTIFIC WAS DEVELOPED BY MARX. IT IS ALSO KNOWN AS MARXISM, COMMUNISM, FULL COMMUNISM, DIALECTICAL MATERIALSIM, OR HISTORICAL MATERIALISM. IT IS A REAL TERM.

<h1>SOCIALISM IS FOR DIPSHITS</h1>

see i've heard of historical materialism

no i'm not i'm amusing myself and hopefully others

you have much to learn since you don't know dick about the people's will huh bitch, how you like that. how about the decemberists, no not the band you twaddling nonce.

I know about the Decemberists.

but you know

socialism is for dipshits

Dialectical materialism, again, isn't really like it's own term so much as it's just materialism using Hegel's typical stupid dialectic approach. I mean I've read more than enough Hegel, Fichte, and Marx to know this...

@ futureboy: maybe a heart attack from laughing too hard

Have you guys heard of Computerial Socialism? It's socialism discussed with the use of computers!

@ futureboy: maybe a heart attack from laughing too hard

That kid is the biggest coward.

he really is pathetic

i mean seriously there's not many times i'm actually angry at my computer and usually when ALL CAPS make an appearance i'm laughing myself retarded

look i think being mean and shouty is fucking funny i dunno about you guys

@ futureboy: maybe a heart attack from laughing too hard

Id miss you just the same.

<3

Unoriginal avatar, has the political sense of a high school freshman, never posts and hides behind dumb comments, and typically has the boarding demeanor of someone no older than age 12.

Are you talking about me, duovamp?

by the way guys i heard socialism is for a particular group but i forgot who

Are you talking about me, duovamp?

I'm talking about my penis. My penis has its own account here. And posts often.

sciencific pee weinerism

dialectical dipshitocracy

i have a secret

Hegel Fichte Marx?

more like Hegel Fuchte Marx

(they were gay i am pretty sure that is socialism)

they were also dipshits amirite

Dshits

doubleplusdipshitty

guys

isn't it Decembrist?

FUCKING PLANET

3497757

guys

isn't it Decembrist?

OH SO WHAT IF IT IS

MAYBE THE DECEMBRISTS WERE SCIENTISTS

i wrote a fucking 10 page paper on the DECEMBRISTS and I didn't spell it "correctly" once and I still got an A. jeez louise. Mall cop/grammar police. Double trouble.

decembwrists

i wrote a fucking 10 page paper on the DECEMBRISTS and I didn't spell it "correctly" once and I still got an A. jeez louise. Mall cop/grammar police. Double trouble.
i am much better at being the grammar police. i should get paid for it.

I <3 socialism.

Does this make Nicholas I a Scientific Emperor?

Hegel Fickte Marx
<!>

i always thought it was the other way around

Does this make Nicholas I a Scientific Emperor?

Nick I was a reactionary and a despot that wanted to retain Russian Orthodoxy in the face of growing discontent and intellectualism...

Peter the Great especially and Alexander II and maybe Alexander I were both more intellectually driven and Catherine the Great in the beginning too (but she went back on that and burned voltaire's work after having written to him frequently in her youth). In fact, Nicholas I carried on the anti-intellectualism Catherine established at the end of her reign. Alexander III and Nicholas II were also hostile to intellectualism.

Sad thing about Alex II was that he was one of the most progressive Tsars but the People's Will blew him up and then Alex III and Nick II followed with increasingly authoritarian and despotic rule that prompted the Revolution. To think that if Alex II lived and established the Duma earlier Russia wouldn't have lived under the Bolshevik yoke...ah well.

Dialectical materialism, again, isn't really like it's own term so much as it's just materialism using Hegel's typical stupid dialectic approach. I mean I've read more than enough Hegel, Fichte, and Marx to know this...

*sigh*

Again, that is not true. Dialectical materialism IS a term for Marxism and it refers to Marx's historical take on Feurbach's revised model of Hegel's dialectic. I don't know why this is so hard to believe, but it is a real term just like scientific socialism.

BTW Hegel was not even a materialist.

who cares

socialism is for dipshits

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Xn_O-mM2sFk/Rz8jEdw3i4I/AAAAAAAABBA/7NwEcTC5W3Q/s400/RonPaulGoldHighRes.jpg

good american!

speaking of socialism, nova scotia just elected its first ndp governement.

speaking of dipshits, nova scotia

THREAD FAILURE

REBOOT

I think you mean a scientific fail.

guys

isn't it Decembrist?differences in transliteration, i imagine.

also when redbreegull uses "socialism" and "communism" interchangeably, it betrays at least a partial lack of understanding

I have no idea what you are talking about. There are TWO MAJOR STREAMS OF THOUGHT IN SOCIALISM. UTOPIAN AND SCIENTIFIC. SCIENTIFIC WAS DEVELOPED BY MARX. IT IS ALSO KNOWN AS...COMMUNISMexhibit A

BTW Hegel was not even a materialist.

Show me where I say this. Please. Show me right now where I said this, and not that Hegel merely uses the dialectic approach harder than anyone else I've ever read.