ravenguy2000
01-28-2009, 06:43 PM
i don't even smoke weed.
you should try, this thread reads a whole lot different after
you should try, this thread reads a whole lot different after
|
View Full Version : Dr. Sanjay Gupta: "Why I Would Vote No On Pot" Pages :
1
[2]
ravenguy2000 01-28-2009, 06:43 PM i don't even smoke weed. you should try, this thread reads a whole lot different after Eulogy 01-28-2009, 06:51 PM you should try, this thread reads a whole lot different after well i mean i have smoked weed. and i don't have a problem with weed. i just never buy it because for me it's not worth the money. but i have quite a few pothead friends so i get to do it for free fairly often. but i haven't in a couple months and probably won't for a while. i just don't really enjoy it that much. i'd rather get drunk. :-/ Trotskilicious 01-28-2009, 09:14 PM i'll trade drunk for stoned any day of the week have you never gotten stoned and listened to one of your favorite albums eulogy Eulogy 01-29-2009, 02:13 AM i'll trade drunk for stoned any day of the week have you never gotten stoned and listened to one of your favorite albums eulogy i have. and i mean, it's fun. but usually the only things that are on my mind are eating and sleeping. Ever 01-29-2009, 03:16 AM As a hardened social conservative I'm against all drugs both illegal and legal as well as alcohol. I have never tried drugs nor will I ever try drugs and they do not interest me in the slightest However due to my beliefs and understanding of economics and society etc. I'd legalize all of them - Including heroin, cocaine, amphetamines and so on redbreegull 01-29-2009, 06:39 AM All Duovamp is saying (I think) is that freedom for freedom's sake is not a good thing to aspire to. There is a bigger picture than just guaranteeing everyone as much freedom as possible, just because freedom is "good". I think that is what he is saying. dudehitscar 01-29-2009, 07:36 AM All Duovamp is saying (I think) is that freedom for freedom's sake is not a good thing to aspire to. There is a bigger picture than just guaranteeing everyone as much freedom as possible, just because freedom is "good". I think that is what he is saying. and i agree with duo there. It's the same problem: One size fits all thinking. He's making the same mistake as the people who promote absolute freedom with his BAN THE BOOZE campaign. publius clodius 01-29-2009, 08:17 AM am i the only one who thinks there has to be something between anarchism and authoritatian absolutism, and that changes in either direction need to be discussed individually ? Eulogy 01-29-2009, 11:14 AM As a hardened social conservative I'm against all drugs both illegal and legal as well as alcohol. I have never tried drugs nor will I ever try drugs and they do not interest me in the slightest However due to my beliefs and understanding of economics and society etc. I'd legalize all of them - Including heroin, cocaine, amphetamines and so on you're a hardened social conservative? what exactly does that mean? Debaser 01-29-2009, 11:29 AM pro-life prolly religiousy too ohnoitsbonnie 01-29-2009, 03:14 PM He's just being annoying Trotskilicious 01-29-2009, 03:32 PM It's his specialty. duovamp 01-29-2009, 04:29 PM his BAN THE BOOZE campaign. Ah yes, my ban the booze campaign. |