01. Intro
02. Tarantula
03. G.L.O.W.
04. Siva
05. Eye
06. Mayonaise
07. Tonight, Tonight
08. Speed Kills
09. Transformer
10. Superchrist
11. United States
12. Band Introduction
13. Once Upon a Time
14. Again, Again, Again (The Crux)
15. The Rose March
16. Banter
17. Today
18. Bullet with Butterfly Wings
19. The Beginning is the End is the Beginning
20. Heavy Metal Machine
21. Glass' Theme
22. Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun [Pink Floyd]
**ENCORE**
23. We Only Come Out at Night
24. In the Summertime [Mungo Jerry]
Man I thought I would only get to hear one of this weekends shows. But damn both of them.. You are awesome. Really making me want to go see them next weekend when they play VA. I guess a road trip may be in my future. :smoke:
Jeremy
Rickpat12
08-10-2008, 07:21 PM
Shit, Bullet, you're the man. Very nice. Thanks for your work.
threnody33
08-10-2008, 07:32 PM
thanks again bullet !
. m
Pizza Club
08-10-2008, 07:56 PM
Awesome, Bullet1979 wins today.
Tribute2JohnnyB
08-10-2008, 08:19 PM
danke.
Dajjal
08-10-2008, 08:46 PM
Sounds really good, thanks again!
wally
08-10-2008, 09:21 PM
awesome. goes to show how important taper position is. this one sounds so much better.
slunken
08-11-2008, 12:29 AM
thanks dude!
daevil1
08-11-2008, 10:59 AM
great recording thanks a lot.
snaildc
08-11-2008, 12:43 PM
amazing how billys voice seems to be getting better in comparison with 6 months ago
New Art Rioter
08-11-2008, 01:15 PM
Thanks for this, really enjoying this recording.
Springbridge
08-11-2008, 01:16 PM
What a kick ass new Intro.
Also, which is better this show or Davenport?
Spaldz
08-11-2008, 01:25 PM
Fucking amazing!!! Thanks
Pizza Club
08-11-2008, 02:03 PM
What a kick ass new Intro.
Also, which is better this show or Davenport?
They are pretty similiar. I would give a slight edge to Hammond though because he messes up the words to "In the Summertime". This one sounds better too.
Springbridge
08-11-2008, 03:01 PM
They are pretty similiar. I would give a slight edge to Hammond though because he messes up the words to "In the Summertime". This one sounds better too.
After comparing the sound quality of both, I'm gonna have to go ahead and agree with you.
Sebastian
08-11-2008, 04:02 PM
Thanks! Good that I just upgraded my DSL line just in time for downloading this tour ;)
Day dreaming Of Darcy
08-11-2008, 06:20 PM
tsp2008-08-09t01.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1912 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t02.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1316 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t03.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2136 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t04.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2332 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t05.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 808 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t06.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 132 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t07.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 332 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t08.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1592 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t09.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 116 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t10.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 544 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t11.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 388 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t12.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2164 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t13.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 148 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t14.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2116 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t15.flac: audio data is cut on a sector boundary.
tsp2008-08-09t16.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1176 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t17.flac: audio data is cut on a sector boundary.
tsp2008-08-09t18.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 188 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t19.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 40 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t20.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1092 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t21.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 640 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t22.flac: audio data is cut on a sector boundary.
tsp2008-08-09t23.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1472 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t24.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 8 bytes).
There were sector boundary errors.
slunken
08-11-2008, 06:21 PM
awesome. goes to show how important taper position is. this one sounds so much better.
i think the venue's slightly muffled/lower sound worked to the taper's advantage, too
Brute Squad
08-11-2008, 07:52 PM
tsp2008-08-09t01.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1912 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t02.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1316 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t03.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2136 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t04.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2332 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t05.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 808 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t06.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 132 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t07.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 332 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t08.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1592 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t09.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 116 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t10.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 544 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t11.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 388 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t12.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2164 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t13.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 148 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t14.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 2116 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t15.flac: audio data is cut on a sector boundary.
tsp2008-08-09t16.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1176 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t17.flac: audio data is cut on a sector boundary.
tsp2008-08-09t18.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 188 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t19.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 40 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t20.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1092 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t21.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 640 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t22.flac: audio data is cut on a sector boundary.
tsp2008-08-09t23.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 1472 bytes).
tsp2008-08-09t24.flac: audio data is not cut on a sector boundary (sector misalignment = 8 bytes).
There were sector boundary errors.
So, open a new waveform, add each track, save it, and re-track the show with CDWave.
Slurpee
08-11-2008, 07:56 PM
So, open a new waveform, add each track, save it, and re-track the show with CDWave.
I thought that didn't work, because not cutting it on sector boundaries eliminates (minuscule) amounts of data.
Brute Squad
08-11-2008, 09:51 PM
You're right. I didn't think about it before I posted.
Sebastian
08-11-2008, 11:00 PM
I thought that didn't work, because not cutting it on sector boundaries eliminates (minuscule) amounts of data.
No. As long as it isn't burned to CD and re-extracted to WAV, no data should be lost and the track transitions should still be seamless when played on a computer.
redbull
08-12-2008, 12:07 AM
wouldn't it be a lot simpler to just use shntool or trader's little helper
Day dreaming Of Darcy
08-12-2008, 12:38 AM
To the original recordist.. ty very much. I posted the SBE report in a hurry as I was heading into the city. The recordings are very much appreciated and, although they have some technical flaws, they sound great!
Yes.. the best way to correct this would be to use shntool or my personal fav, trader's little helper. You can load up all the tracks (in order) and then use TLH to fix them all at once. It will just 'remap' each song by taking a few sectors from either the beginning or end of each track and append it to the previous/next track. However, it's not full proof; the music within the tracks needs to be contiguous.
Errors like this need to be cleaned up and fixed on the version that is uploaded to the LMA, even if as stated by Sebastian, it's not really a problem until burned to cd then re-extracted to wav. I'd be more than happy to assist the recordist in this process if need be.
I also noticed the LMA identifiers weren't really in the preferred etree naming scheme, or even consistently between the two shows. If it were me, I would have named them:
tsp2008-08-08.csc.flac16
tsp2008-08-09.csc.flac16
Tyler H. at the LMA can can very easily fix the identifier if the uploader sends him an email.
One of my goals since probably last summer has been to start up a faq or blog specifically dealing with the editing of shows and upload to the lma. There's a ton of steps involved, especially with the LMA's very non-user friendly interface. Many things can go wrong and correcting them can be a real bitch. Perhaps I will get on that sooner than later.
Brute Squad
08-12-2008, 01:02 AM
I've noticed your use of the term recordist as of late. What are the origins of this term and do you feel that society is ready to accept it with open arms and willing to integrate it into the lexicon?
Day dreaming Of Darcy
08-12-2008, 07:43 AM
I've noticed your use of the term recordist as of late. What are the origins of this term and do you feel that society is ready to accept it with open arms and willing to integrate it into the lexicon?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/recordist
Rockin' Cherub
08-12-2008, 07:49 AM
...and i have the last post on every board
Sebastian
08-12-2008, 08:11 AM
I've noticed your use of the term recordist as of late.
Yeah, isn't that a great term? Sooooo much better than these...