Kevin3381
07-16-2007, 11:17 AM
How many stars??
|
View Full Version : RollingStone Review Prediction Kevin3381 07-16-2007, 11:17 AM How many stars?? SpFission 07-16-2007, 11:19 AM 3 or more...since aren't they supposed to be on the cover soon? pete 07-16-2007, 11:22 AM I dont think i can remember the critics opinions being split so much before. i'd guess 3/5 or something like that. The Trashbirds 07-16-2007, 11:22 AM Well, after them insinuating that Billy wrote that parody of an open letter, who the fuck knows? I am genuinely surprised by these mixed reviews. Of all the reviews that hate the album, other than production issues, they all seem to hate very different things and pick on very different things. One even said Jimmy's drumming sucked while all the others said that was among the only stand-out quality characteristics of the album. Same goes for the positive ones. Some say "Bring the Light" rules while others say "skip this Zwany song and check out Doomsday Clock." Honestly, these things are all over the place. All of them seem to agree however: Billy is a douchebag. if there is a llama 07-16-2007, 11:27 AM I'll say it gets two stars and a bad review, but in a different part of the magazine, a smaller article will talk about how one of the songs is a must listen (and probably contradict everything the review said). Rolling stone likes to do that to cover their bases. Corgan Rules 07-16-2007, 11:33 AM They are a shitty magazine with shitty reviewers, so I predict a 2 1/2 or a 3 star. Thta magazine just doesn't have a clue! bigleaguechew 07-16-2007, 11:45 AM 4 stars. Boycott Graceland 07-16-2007, 11:51 AM They are a shitty magazine with shitty reviewers, so I predict a 2 1/2 or a 3 star. Thta magazine just doesn't have a clue! are you a troll? those fucking retards gave weezer's green album five stars they are a total industry promotional tool these days. there's no credibility to them at all. i'm sure they will give zeitgeist 4 or more stars M.Night 07-16-2007, 11:52 AM who cares? theFoulLasagna 07-16-2007, 12:30 PM they didn't give the green album 5 stars. they did say that pinkerton was one of the worst albums of the year back in 1996, but if you go look at it now on the website, they have it with a 5 star review. but, they had a live video review of zeitgeist that was very positive. i predict 3 to 3 1/2 teamneedle 07-16-2007, 12:46 PM Rolling Stone doesn't even know what year it is. They just posted the Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire review on their main page. Meanwhile, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the movie in theaters. so you might want to expect them to repost the machina review instead of zeitgeist. teamneedle 07-16-2007, 12:49 PM are you a troll? those fucking retards gave weezer's green album five stars they are a total industry promotional tool these days. there's no credibility to them at all. i'm sure they will give zeitgeist 4 or more stars they must have felt swoll for the 5 star green album review because it is no longer up there. schmokes 07-16-2007, 02:38 PM I'm predicting 3 starzzzzz. Brute Squad 07-16-2007, 02:53 PM I'm predicting that I don't give a shit. gossamer1234 07-16-2007, 02:59 PM I'm predicting that I don't give a shit. yep. rollingstone's music reviews are almost as lame as their movie reviews. i wish they were as irrelevant. Rider 07-16-2007, 03:00 PM they didn't give the green album 5 stars. they did say that pinkerton was one of the worst albums of the year back in 1996, but if you go look at it now on the website, they have it with a 5 star review. but, they had a live video review of zeitgeist that was very positive. i predict 3 to 3 1/2 Guess what most Weezer fans hated that album when it came out also. That has to be the bigest example of an album that improves with age. Rider 07-16-2007, 03:01 PM I also love the way that it's already setup that people are going to bitch no mater what they give it. |