i had a dream in which i read a newspaper article that stated that christina aguilera had accidentally died on the set of a "porno" movie shoot. i'm just posting this here because in case it does happen i want it to be some sort of validation that i foresaw this. if not..then it doesn't matter and i'm a fool.

oh and interestingly enough, i tried looking up what christina aguilera is up to these days and this article was placed online today:

Raunchy popstar to strip in movie
Thursday June 1 2006 01:05 IST

ANI

LONDON: Legendary burlesque stripper Tempest Storm is angry over Hollywood bosses' plans to make a movie on her without her permission.

Though the 78-year-old retired dancer has no doubts Christina Aguilera would be perfect for the part, she insists she has not been approached by studio chiefs and still has the rights to her life story and autobiography "The Lady Is A Vamp".

"They don't have the rights to my life story and I'm still alive," The Sun quoted the legend who ruled over the world of burlesque for five decades, as saying.

"I don't think they'd make an unauthorised movie. I own the rights to my life story and my book," she added.

Last month the raunchy pop star said she likes to get naked and feels uncomfortable covering up her body.

http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IE420060531144422&Page=4&Title=Features+%2D+People+%26+Lifestyle&Topic=0&

awesome thread man

in the year 2000



if christina aquilera does die - i'm sending her estate this link and the feds will come get you tony!

i predict that she sprains her ankle during filming and you consequently declare your vision validated.

tony, were you an indigo child?

in the year 2000

I finally saw this bit on conan the other day with Gob from Arrested Development doing it.

It was pretty lame except the joke about how White Castles would cut out the middle man and start shredding burgers themselves and throwing them into toilets. I sure I ruined the joke but it was funny.

in the year 2000...

Michael Jackson will invent a time machine, so he can travel back to 1970 and cuddle himself.

tony, were you an indigo child?

it's funny that you ask that. i remember when i was a child telling my older sister that i thought i was someone important or a king of some kind in a past life and my sister basically scoffed at me and made me feel stupid. when you look at the criteria for what makes someone an indigo child the very first trait talks about having a sense of royalty.
who knows...i don't know if i am or if i'm not....dunno.

in the year 2000



if christina aquilera does die - i'm sending her estate this link and the feds will come get you tony!

no shannon don't :(...well okay...only if the feds are hot though.

tony, were you an indigo child?
No, he wasn't, because "indigo children" are a bunch of hooey made up to sell books

No, he wasn't, because "indigo children" are a bunch of hooey made up to sell books

And you know the truth about everything? I'm not saying that the theory is true...but you don't know for a fact that it's false either.

haha

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigo_child

The indigo child concept was first publicised by the book The Indigo Children, written by the husband and wife team of Lee Carroll and Jan Tober1. Carroll insists that the concept was obtained via conversations with a spiritual entity known as "Kryon".

Carroll describes himself as a channeller for Kryon, an angelic being. One of the book's six chapters focuses on the spiritual aspects of claimed indigos. Some followers take the stance that the arrival of these children is wholly a spiritual phenomenon, and that indigo children are the beginning of a new hybrid, possibly alien.



that's tom cruise crazy right there

A few years ago I had some lady, who is deeply entrenched in the "new age" movement, enthusiastically diagnose me as an Indigo Kid. This was before I told her about the dream I had as a thirteen year old where I experienced intense feelings of bliss and that "children" and the color "indigo" were the dominant features of the landscape. Course, it's all justa silly coincidence. Life doesn't require pie-in-the-sky lables and superficial concepts to be interesting, or meaningful. Nimrod's Son is probably correct. Spirituality is big business.

haha

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigo_child



that's tom cruise crazy right there

Aren't you a Christian? Your theories could be just as crazy as the Scientologist's claims. No one knows the ultimate truth about anything.

And you know the truth about everything? I'm not saying that the theory is true...but you don't know for a fact that it's false either.
Homer: Not a bear in sight. This "Bear Patrol" is working like a charm!
Lisa: That's specious reasoning, Dad.
Homer: [uncomprehendingly] Thanks, honey.
Lisa: By your logic, I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away.
Homer: Hmm. How does it work?
Lisa: It doesn't work; it's just a stupid rock!
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: But I don't see any tigers around, do you?
Homer: (pause) Lisa, I want to buy your rock.

No, he wasn't, because "indigo children" are a bunch of hooey made up to sell books
that's just a lie made up to sell ritalin.

Way to skirt around the issue Nimrod. You still didn't answer my question. What makes Christianity any more valid than Scientology?

The only acceptable and correct answer to that question is that there is no conclusive evidence to support either religion as being true.

Jesus wasn't making any money.

Jesus wasn't making any money.

And no one profits off bible sales? Of course they do. Don't be ridiculous.

Christianity was big way before even that Gutenberg guy came around.

Good luck getting a decent answer Tony.

Good luck getting a decent answer Tony.

Thanks. I'll need it. Some people are just so ignorant to new and different ideas. If things don't fit into their tiny parameters of their beliefs on ultimate truth than they discredit it as being "crazy". Even when they find out old information was probably incorrect...they stubbornly refuse to update their viewpoints. Example: The Judas Gospel.

Way to skirt around the issue Nimrod. You still didn't answer my question. What makes Christianity any more valid than Scientology?
You shouldn't need a fucking reason, dipshit. The answer is pretty obvious. one is far more likely to be a scam perpetrated by a secretive organization founded by a science fiction writer who basically stated beforehand that he wanted to form a religion because of the money, and the other isn't. Did you know you can go to church for free? It's true

You shouldn't need a fucking reason, dipshit. The answer is pretty obvious. one is far more likely to be a scam perpetrated by a secretive organization founded by a science fiction writer who basically stated beforehand that he wanted to form a religion because of the money, and the other isn't. Did you know you can go to church for free? It's true

Xtianity sure has caused alot more suffering though.

i remember when i was a child telling my older sister that i thought i was someone important or a king of some kind in a past life and my sister basically scoffed at me and made me feel stupid. when you look at the criteria for what makes someone an indigo child the very first trait talks about having a sense of royalty.
who knows...i don't know if i am or if i'm not....dunno.

you mean queen, don't you? ;)

Xtianity sure has caused alot more suffering though.
No, people have used it as an excuse to inflict suffering for power.

one is far more likely to be a scam perpetrated by a secretive organization founded by a science fiction writer who basically stated beforehand that he wanted to form a religion because of the money...

...and then there's scientology.

Jesus wasn't making any money.
You shouldn't need a fucking reason, dipshit. The answer is pretty obvious. one is far more likely to be a scam perpetrated by a secretive organization founded by a science fiction writer who basically stated beforehand that he wanted to form a religion because of the money, and the other isn't. Did you know you can go to church for free? It's true
it looks like one of my predictions has come true.

You shouldn't need a fucking reason, dipshit. The answer is pretty obvious. one is far more likely to be a scam perpetrated by a secretive organization founded by a science fiction writer who basically stated beforehand that he wanted to form a religion because of the money, and the other isn't. Did you know you can go to church for free? It's true

Listen you dense piece of shit...You can't prove any of the things Christians believe such as immaculate conception, the holy trinity, Jesus turning water into wine, Jesus making a few loaves of breads and a couple of fish feed hundreds of people..(South Park...Jesus: Turn Around...Turn Around...) anymore than Scientologists can prove any of the same things they believe. Just because Christianity is accepted by a vaster number of people than Scientology doesn't make it any more true, neanderthal motherfucker.

it looks like one of my predictions has come true.

You're an idiot.

you're a christian.

http://www.funnyhub.com/pictures/img/christina-aguilera-timeline.jpg

http://www.funnyhub.com/pictures/img/christina-aguilera-timeline.jpg

:rofl:

Just because Christianity is accepted by a vaster number of people than Scientology doesn't make it any more true, neanderthal motherfucker.


that's not what i said at all you crackpot

It takes less of an idiot to become a christian than it does to believe any of the nonsense you spout Tony.
^^

Lets back off him, its not really sporting considering how deep his delusions of adequacy run.

idiocy is idiocy, as far as i'm concerned!

http://www.funnyhub.com/pictures/img/christina-aguilera-timeline.jpg

lol. that's fucking hilarious. twisted sister used to scare me as a kid. :(

Boy wants a car from his Dad
Dad says, first you gotta cut that hair
Boy says, hey Dad Jesus had long hair
and Dad says
that's right son but Jesus walked everywhere

that's not what i said at all you crackpot

You still never answered my question. You wrote off Scientology as a profitable idea executed by a fiction writer. Okay so that discredits Scientology (possibly). You still didn't prove Christianity was at all true.

Lets back off him, its not really sporting considering how deep his delusions of adequacy run.

Where is your first post in this thread by the way? You didn't have the balls to keep it posted?
I already told you to avoid my threads if they don't interest you. You're as dense as fucking Nimrod. I don't give a shit about your opinion of me or my beliefs.

You still never answered my question. You wrote off Scientology as a profitable idea executed by a fiction writer. Okay so that discredits Scientology (possibly). You still didn't prove Christianity was at all true.
That wasn't your question. Your question was:
What makes Christianity any more valid than Scientology?

... and I did.

Where is your first post in this thread by the way? You didn't have the balls to keep it posted?
I was cutting you some slack you stupid fat faggot.

haha

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigo_child
fucking hell

http://www.randomfate.net/MT/media/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster.jpg

I was cutting you some slack you stupid fat faggot.

Don't do me any favors. Say what's really on your mind. I'm a big boy...I can take care of myself. It's funny to see people who have always seemed sort of gay friendly and non-homophobic always resort to using "faggot" when provoked by someone gay. I guess you find out someone's true colors (definitely not rainbow) in times of conflict.

RAINBOW CAMO!!

http://www.rainbowcreation.nl/httpdocs/fotos%20bodypaint%20htm/026.jpg

(for times of conflict)

this is getting way off track.

perhaps Xtina is the new messiah!?!?!?

Don't do me any favors. Say what's really on your mind. I'm a big boy...I can take care of myself. It's funny to see people who have always seemed sort of gay friendly and non-homophobic always resort to using "faggot" when provoked by someone gay. I guess you find out someone's true colors (definitely not rainbow) in times of conflict.
Oh you're a big boy, but you cant take care of yourself, always looking for solace deluded new age ramblings.

I dont see anyone coming to your aid in this thread, you know why? Cos even the gays think you're being a faggot.

Oh you're a big boy, but you cant take care of yourself, always looking for solace deluded new age ramblings.

I dont see anyone coming to your aid in this thread, you know why? Cos even the gays think you're being a faggot.

I don't need anyone to come to my aid. Being gay doesn't make us all have the same beliefs or personalities. Why should they defend me? I get along with all my fellow homos on this board and I like all of them and I think the feelings are mutual.

And yes I do believe in some new age concepts but my point is that they can be considered just as crazy as Scientology or Christianity because ultimately no one knows the ultimate truth about anything. People in glass houses (Nimrod) shouldn't throw stones.

I dont see anyone coming to your aid in this thread, you know why? Cos even the gays think you're being a faggot.

dominated

i make a prediction about the near future.
it doesn't matter and i'm a fool.


What makes Christianity any more valid than Scientology?
nothing, they are synonymous.

I tend to thoroughly enjoy religious/spiritual/metaphysical debates/arguments, however this time I won't bother commenting personally, instead I will link to a summary of my opinions and beliefs.
If anyone wants to have a mature debate on the subject, I suggest starting a new thread. :smoke:

Nihilism (http://www.counterorder.com/nihilism.html)

Hey spaced, are these all tangents from your conversations with your AHDHSADADDD boyfriend?

And yes I do believe in some new age concepts but my point is that they can be considered just as crazy as Scientology or Christianity because ultimately no one knows the ultimate truth about anything. People in glass houses (Nimrod) shouldn't throw stones.
so what's your excuse for calling me an idiot? i don't live in any glass house!

I've come to accept that you have to begin with making something up in order for there to be truth. But even if perhaps scientologists and myself differ fundamentally only because we assume different unprovable axioms, I WILL STILL NOT HESITATE TO KILL THEM COME THE DAY OF RECKONING