BeautifulLoser
09-13-2005, 12:52 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050913/ap_on_go_ot/katrina_washington
There's a first
There's a first
|
View Full Version : Bush takes responsibility for blunders BeautifulLoser 09-13-2005, 12:52 PM http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050913/ap_on_go_ot/katrina_washington There's a first pastry sharp 09-13-2005, 01:17 PM Originally posted by BeautifulLoser http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050913/ap_on_go_ot/katrina_washington There's a first wow. that's terrific ZackZ 09-13-2005, 01:26 PM Originally posted by pastry sharp wow. that's terrific I don't like Bush, but I wish he was never in the position to have admit failure in a situation like this. pastry sharp 09-13-2005, 01:33 PM Originally posted by ZackZ I don't like Bush, but I wish he was never in the position to have admit failure in a situation like this. kind of in the same boat with you - but on the other hand, it's really noble to step up and say, the buck stops here. that's a huge part of what i respect in any person. although i've agreed with bush on a few issues in the past, this is the first time that he's done something that i feel is worthy of my respect (regardless of why he said it). sleeper 09-13-2005, 01:41 PM thats the best possible thing he couldve done, politically speaking, and i was hoping he wouldnt do it so that he would continue to raise the ire of people. hes looked like a real fool in the past for constantly passing the buck or pig-headedly delivering "upbeat" assessments that run contrary to the facts, and if he were to continue on with that type of reaction here it wouldve been incredibly damaging, i think. from that perspective im disappointed his advisers actually recognized the need to publicly take responsibility. his PR staff seems to have been uncharacteristically inept these past few months and they were doing an awful job dealing with the hurricane. shame to see them getting their act together Future Boy 09-13-2005, 02:06 PM This is the first major thing he's ever taken on. I wonder if it will have an effect on all the Bush freaks who think he can do no wrong, and who were doing what the WH was doing, decrying the blame game while blaming the local governtment. I give him credit for doing the right thing, but I doubt that's why he did it. Nimrod's Son 09-13-2005, 02:27 PM Originally posted by sleeper thats the best possible thing he couldve done, politically speaking, and i was hoping he wouldnt do it so that he would continue to raise the ire of people. he's not running for re-election oh yeah you want the country to fail, i forgot sleeper 09-13-2005, 03:44 PM Originally posted by Nimrod's Son he's not running for re-election oh yeah you want the country to fail, i forgot oh come on, youre obviously not this narrow minded, why do you bother posting such tripe? obviously what looks bad for him, looks bad for his party. disfavour or favour doesnt contain itself to the one thing, it spreads, and he can easily become a liability for all republicans. hell, you already have republicans trying to distance themselves from the war in iraq in view of the midterms, if bush keeps it up he'll be treated the same Trotskilicious 09-13-2005, 08:24 PM Bush doing badly means Republicans doing badly come midterm. Elementary politics. Trotskilicious 09-13-2005, 08:25 PM Of course, no one has found any Democrats worth voting for yet. Shparticus 09-13-2005, 09:03 PM Originally posted by Nimrod's Son he's not running for re-election oh yeah you want the country to fail, i forgot Damn. You are off your game, son. :noway: sleeper 09-13-2005, 09:24 PM maybe he is that narrow minded. perhaps i was being too generous Mariner 09-13-2005, 09:53 PM Originally posted by Trotskilicious Of course, no one has found any Democrats worth voting for yet. have they checked all of the hospitals in new orleans? pastry sharp 09-15-2005, 02:34 PM has anyone seen this apology? i retract my support for the president on this issue. it was one of the most disingenuous apologies i've ever witnessed. his body language essentially said, "hey shit happens"... i'm surprised i'm the first person to mention this. since i've now taken a partisan position on this subject, i'd like to take a minute to say that barbera bush is totally bat shit crazy. sleeper 09-15-2005, 02:47 PM yeah i was going to mention how it was cushioned in ambiguous terms and everything but i think, regardless of how watered down, this is still a landmark thing for bush to have done. and, besides, all of the papers arent even bothering quoting the qualifying terms he used and are essentially just quoting the words "i take responsibility" BeautifulLoser 09-15-2005, 03:57 PM Originally posted by pastry sharp has anyone seen this apology? i retract my support for the president on this issue. it was one of the most disingenuous apologies i've ever witnessed. his body language essentially said, "hey shit happens"... i surprised i'm the first person to mention this. since i've now taken a partisan position on this subject, i'd like to take a minute to say that barbera bush is totally bat shit crazy. I didn't actually see it.. that sucks. Trotskilicious 09-15-2005, 04:07 PM Originally posted by BeautifulLoser I didn't actually see it.. that sucks. So you're taking the word of a douchebag on the internet instead of seeing it for yourself? You are a mindless drone. pastry sharp 09-15-2005, 04:36 PM Originally posted by Trotskilicious So you're taking the word of a douchebag on the internet instead of seeing it for yourself? You are a mindless drone. you really are quite pointless. sleeper 09-15-2005, 04:42 PM yeah why are you being so mean to pasty, trotsky? i must have missed some thread where you two clashed that layed the seeds for this. youre all over him in that other thread too. be nice. i like pastry and we all should because hes a bright, upstanding guy. how rare are people of his quality here? quite, id say sleeper 09-15-2005, 04:45 PM pastry gets it too tough, he doesnt deserve the kind of shit he gets. the only person who gets attacked more than he does, often as completely senselessly and superfluously, is beautiful loser. but she seems really used to it by now so whatever pastry sharp 09-15-2005, 06:25 PM Originally posted by sleeper pastry gets it too tough, he doesnt deserve the kind of shit he gets. the only person who gets attacked more than he does, often as completely senselessly and superfluously, is beautiful loser. but she seems really used to it by now so whatever thanks for the kind words, but in fairness, only two people have really attacked me outside of debating their point, and i freely admit that i dished it back to them as well. there is very little that would be said on this board that i would take personally. anyway, thanks for the support. sleeper 09-15-2005, 06:28 PM friends 4 life? Trotskilicious 09-16-2005, 01:39 AM I wasn't mean to pastry sharp in this thread at all. I just think both of you are partisans. Future Boy 09-16-2005, 02:54 AM Originally posted by sleeper yeah i was going to mention how it was cushioned in ambiguous terms and everything but i think, regardless of how watered down, this is still a landmark thing for bush to have done. and, besides, all of the papers arent even bothering quoting the qualifying terms he used and are essentially just quoting the words "i take responsibility" It's smart politically though. But I hadnt seen it either. sleeper 09-16-2005, 08:13 AM Originally posted by Future Boy It's smart politically though. But I hadnt seen it either. just in general you should always go check out the primary source info, it gives you a sense of things you cant get otherwise. newspapers selectively quote the most moronic things sometimes, especially when it comes to a new videotape speech by some terrorist or something. Future Boy 09-16-2005, 12:24 PM Originally posted by sleeper just in general you should always go check out the primary source info, it gives you a sense of things you cant get otherwise. newspapers selectively quote the most moronic things sometimes, especially when it comes to a new videotape speech by some terrorist or something. it wouldnt load at the time, and no one was mentioning his crappy taking of the blame. But yeah, i know. sleeper 09-16-2005, 12:32 PM i evidently gave the wrong impression. i wasnt trying to like lecture you or something, i know youre a competent, capable guy, im just expressing some disgust at how the media conveys these things thats another good thing about the new york times, as they have historically always published full transcripts of key speeches and everything. ive never really understood why more papers dont do this kind of stuff. they cant seriously be worrying about the cost of the extra paper needed to publish long articles or lots of raw information. more room for advertisement money or whatever, i would assume. i dont get it Future Boy 09-16-2005, 12:43 PM Well knowing Bush I figured it wasnt that sincere, but I thought it was better than what he did. The media response was pretty bad. *star* 09-16-2005, 09:47 PM he's covering for someone. bush does no wrong. Trotskilicious 09-17-2005, 03:15 PM Originally posted by *star* he's covering for someone. bush does no wrong. Are you for real? He was dicking around on his ranch two days after the hurricane made landfall. *star* 09-17-2005, 03:19 PM Originally posted by Trotskilicious Are you for real? He was dicking around on his ranch two days after the hurricane made landfall. oh yeah, blame the president. ANYTHING goes wrong, blame the president. i bet you believe that kay west guy, too. oh poor poor blacks. transluscent 09-17-2005, 03:28 PM told you he was good Trotskilicious 09-17-2005, 03:29 PM Carlos Mencia had proof of the phenomenon of white people finding and black people looting on Wedensday's show. *star* 09-17-2005, 03:39 PM Originally posted by Trotskilicious Carlos Mencia had proof of the phenomenon of white people finding and black people looting on Wedensday's show. was it those stupid pictures supposedly pointing that "fact" out, but it really showed a black person with diapers in a big, black bag filled with other hot merchandise and the other showed a white family and you can see the bread in their bag. that picture was used so much, but it really only proved, in that instance atleast, that the black person was looting and the white people were scavaging. Future Boy 09-17-2005, 03:52 PM Originally posted by *star* was it those stupid pictures supposedly pointing that "fact" out, but it really showed a black person with diapers in a big, black bag filled with other hot merchandise and the other showed a white family and you can see the bread in their bag. You can see inside their bag? :eek: http://www.vanguardsquad.com/soulstrutish/vanzetti/Find-v-Loot.jpg *star* 09-17-2005, 04:02 PM Originally posted by Future Boy You can see inside their bag? :eek: http://www.vanguardsquad.com/soulstrutish/vanzetti/Find-v-Loot.jpg from that picture you can see diapers in the black person's hand and food in the whites. diapers = looting food = necessary scavanging Future Boy 09-17-2005, 04:09 PM It could be a case of pop, like , Diet Rite. Diet Rite = necessary scavenging *star* 09-17-2005, 04:15 PM Originally posted by Future Boy It could be a case of pop, like , Diet Rite. Diet Rite = necessary scavenging a case of pop doesn't float. transluscent 09-17-2005, 04:20 PM i'm sorry, why would you take diapers besides if you have small children (necessity). also, this is of course how everyone acts in new orleans. BeautifulLoser 09-17-2005, 04:27 PM Originally posted by *star* a case of pop doesn't float. http://www.adweek.com/adweek/photos/2004/12/W2/06_N_News_DietPepsi_L.jpg *star* 09-17-2005, 04:37 PM Originally posted by BeautifulLoser http://www.adweek.com/adweek/photos/2004/12/W2/06_N_News_DietPepsi_L.jpg you show me a 12 pack of that pop that floats and i'll take you to get your fishy vag waxed. Trotskilicious 09-17-2005, 07:43 PM "Diapers are looting." You're hilarious, troll. Graveflower 09-17-2005, 09:29 PM Originally posted by Trotskilicious Carlos Mencia had proof of the phenomenon of white people finding and black people looting on Wedensday's show. you watch mencia? i'm dissapointed in your sense of humor, sween. Nimrod's Son 09-17-2005, 10:02 PM Originally posted by Trotskilicious Carlos Mencia had proof of the phenomenon of white people finding and black people looting on Wedensday's show. I can't believe nobody noticed the obvious apples/oranges in those photos. They are from different sources and captioned by different organizations. Trotskilicious 09-18-2005, 01:15 AM It's one small example of a multitude. I don't expect you to care about this though, Nimrod. Nimrod's Son 09-18-2005, 03:14 AM Originally posted by Trotskilicious It's one small example of a multitude. I don't expect you to care about this though, Nimrod. Actually it's the only example I've ever seen presented. If there were multitudes, you would think that a better example would be circulated..... Lie 09-19-2005, 10:55 PM Originally posted by transluscent i'm sorry, why would you take diapers besides if you have small children (necessity). I dunno, some people are into that freaky shit. Trotskilicious 09-20-2005, 06:42 PM Originally posted by Nimrod's Son Actually it's the only example I've ever seen presented. If there were multitudes, you would think that a better example would be circulated..... Actually, two stories from news services is a great example because these two stories were probably circulated throughout the nation from Olympia to Bangor. I know you're having trouble with this concept of bias against black folks in the media because you're pretty racist yourself. Graveflower 09-20-2005, 06:43 PM who cares about politics, why are you watching the mind of mencia neopryn 09-20-2005, 07:00 PM yeah i've only seen commercials and the 5 minutes preceding the daily show but that guys seems about as unfunny as it gets |